AI Overview...
-
Radhe Shyam Singh - Several court decisions involving Radhe Shyam Singh highlight issues related to property rights, possession, and legal proceedings. Notably, in No. 598 of 2011, the case involved disputes between The Vice Chancellor and others versus Radhe Shyam Singh and others, indicating legal conflicts over property or authority Arun Kumar Singh VS State of Bihar - Patna.
-
Property and possession disputes - Multiple cases, such as Radhe Shyam Garg v. State of Haryana and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam v. State of Punjab, address issues of possession, property rights, and statutory interpretations related to property law, emphasizing that the term subject-matter in civil law does not necessarily mean property but can refer to broader legal issues Amrit Bansal VS M. L. Goyal - Punjab and Haryana.
-
Ejectment and tenancy issues - In cases like Radhe Shyam (1988) and Madanlal, courts examined grounds for ejectment, including personal necessity, with references to the interpretation of property rights and tenant protections under relevant statutes Amrit Bansal VS M. L. Goyal - Punjab and Haryana.
-
Legal procedures and appellate authority - Decisions such as the one reported in IND_HC_KLHC010349971996 clarify that appellate courts can issue notices if parties are affected, and that the appellate process can involve examining evidence and procedural correctness in property and civil disputes NARAYANAN NAIR vs RUGMINI AMMA - Kerala.
-
Corporate liquidation and legal proceedings - The case Jaya and others (2022) emphasizes that liquidation aims to maximize asset value for creditors, with suits initiated by liquidators requiring prior approval; revival of companies is not the primary objective M/S KENNIGTON INDUSTRIES PVT LTD vs M/S SPADS TEXTILES LIMITED - Andhra Pradesh.
-
Maintainability of legal petitions - Cases like Sudheer Mohan and others highlight reliance on precedents such as Radhe Shyam to argue about the procedural correctness and maintainability of revision petitions, especially concerning property disputes and procedural objections Kennigton Industries Pvt. Ltd. VS Spads Textiles Ltd. - Andhra Pradesh.
-
Legal liability and official duties - In cases involving obstruction of official duties, courts have held that cases can be maintained under section 353 of the IPC if obstruction occurs during official discharge, as discussed in the context of Radhe Shyam Makharia Nishikant Dubey (Member of Parliament) VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand.
-
Civil appeals and mesne profits - Disputes over property occupancy, rent, and mesne profits are addressed through appeals, with courts determining compensation based on prevailing rent and occupancy conditions, as seen in the Sealdah case Special Steel & Wire Wings VS Radhe Shyam Bhootra - Calcutta.
Analysis and Conclusion
The references collectively depict Radhe Shyam as a party involved in various legal disputes primarily related to property rights, possession, and procedural aspects of civil and criminal law. Courts have emphasized the importance of proper legal procedures, the scope of appellate authority, and the interpretation of legal terms like subject-matter. Additionally, the cases reflect broader themes such as the objectives of liquidation, tenant protections, and the procedural requirements for maintaining legal petitions. These insights underscore the multifaceted legal issues surrounding Radhe Shyam and similar parties, highlighting the importance of procedural correctness, proper evidence, and adherence to statutory provisions in resolving disputes.
Search Results for "Radhe Shyam and Others"
2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8823 • India - High Court of Punjab and Haryana
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J
Raghunath Singh Rana and others, 2016(12) SCC 204 , decided on 17.05.2016 and in Civil Appeal No. 9417 of 2019 titled as M/s Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another vs.
2012 0 Supreme(Pat) 1404 • India - Patna
RAVI RANJAN
No. 598 of 2011 (The Vice Chancellor and others Vs. Radhe Shyam Singh and others) and other analogous matters.
2015 0 Supreme(P&H) 859 • India - Punjab and Haryana
JITENDRA CHAUHAN
Haryana Power General Corporation Ltd., and others, 2006(3) SCT 412; Radhe Shyam Garg v. ... State of Haryana and others, 2015(2) SCT 624; Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and others v. ... State of Punjab and others, 1989(1) RSJ 629; State of Haryana v. Deepak Sood and others; Dilwar Singh v. ... Deepak Sood and others, rendered in SLP (C) No. 14099 of 2006, Dilwar Singh v. Haryana Power General Corporation Ltd., and others, 2006....
2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 49982 • India - High Court of Kerala
K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J
Further in the decision reported in Radhe Shyam and others v. ... Further in the decision reported in Shanmugam and others v. ... Further in the decision reported in Amirchand Nagindas & Co. and Others v. ... He had relied on the decision reported in (AIR 1961 SCC 1277) Devidas and others v. Shri Shailappa and Others for the proposition that if necessary, the appellate court itself can issue notice if the concerned party is in any way affected. ... Raoji Bhai Moti Bha....
2014 0 Supreme(P&H) 1226 • India - Punjab and Haryana
SABINA
Radhe Shyam, Vallabh Das v. Dr. ... Madanlal and Others Fact of the Case: The respondent sought ejectment of the petitioner on the ground of personal necessity ... Radhe Shyam, : 1988(1) R.C.R.(Rent) 511 : 1988(3) SCC 18]. ... Madanlal and Others, : (1970) 1 SCC 761, this Court observed thus:- ... The expression "subject-matter" is not defined in the Civil Procedure Code. It does not mean property.
2022 0 Supreme(All) 1674 • India - Allahabad
J. J. MUNIR
The other important feature is that there is nothing on record to show that Dhoop Kali owned the suit property or she ever had possession of it. ... (5) Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to any other relief? 6. ... The plaintiffs in support of their case examined PW-1, Shyam Charan, PW-2 Kamlesh and PW-3, Ram Ladaite, who filed their affidavits in lieu of their examination-in-chief in the dock. No evidence was led on behalf of the defendant nos.7 to 11 to the suit.
2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 18958 • India - High Court of Andhra Pradesh
B.S. BHANUMATHI, J
Jaya and others, [2022 Live Law (SC) 574]. It was held at para No.7 as follows: instituted by or against the corporate debtor: Provided that a suit or other legal proceeding may be instituted by the liquidator, on behalf of the corporate debtor, with the prior approval of the Adjudicating Authority. ... The objective of the liquidation process is to derive the maximum value from the assets of the corporate debtor for the benefit of various creditors and other stakeholders in the company under liquidation. The objective is not the revival ....
2024 0 Supreme(AP) 1495 • India - Andhra Pradesh
B. S. BHANUMATHI
When the office of the Registry raised an objection about the maintainability of the revision petition, the revision petitioners placed reliance on the decisions in Radhe Shyam and others v. ... Sudheer Mohan and others , 2022 Live Law (SC) 864; Timothy Ravinder Dev Pradeep v. Charles Samraj N. and others and the CSI Coimbatore Diocese v. Charles Samraj N. and others , MANU/TN/9795/2021 and Election Engineering Company Limited v. ... Tuticorin Educational Society and othe....
2024 0 Supreme(Jhk) 87 • India - Jharkhand
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Pankaj Kumar, the learned counsel for the State in the case of Radhe Shyam Makharia and Others v. ... Pankaj Kumar, the learned counsel for the respondent State in the case of Radhe Shyam Makharia and Others v. State of Bihar and Others(supra) is not helping the respondent State. 17. I am in agreement on the judgment relied by Mr. ... He submits that obstruction in any manner in discharge of official duty the case can be maintained under section 353 of the I.P.C and t....
2022 0 Supreme(Cal) 1109 • India - Calcutta
KESANG DOMA BHUTIA
On the other hand the tenant preferred an appeal being Ejectment appeal no. 2 of 21 before the additional District, Judge, 1st Court, Sealdah. ... On the other hand the buildings in which the Punjab and National Bank and Decathlon showroom are housed and situated opposite to the disputed building appear to be newly constructed structure. ... Reported in SCC (2005) 2 WBLR (SC) 230, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that while determining the quantum of the amount of mesne profits or compensation for use and occupation of the premises, the rent which the land l....
Filter by Legal Phrase
