AI Overview...
-
Rejection of Company Petition and Appointment of Provisional Liquidator - The Court considered the circumstances under which a provisional liquidator can be appointed, referencing the Companies Act 1956, Section 450(1), and related Rules. The admission of Company Petition No. 353 of 1992 was discussed, indicating procedural considerations in insolvency proceedings. Darshan Anilkumar Patel VS Gitaneel Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and others - Bombay
-
Legal Proceedings and Evidence in Criminal Cases - The High Court provided cogent reasons for acquitting accused A-1 to A-8, citing circumstantial evidence and motives related to the murder of Shankar Guha Niyogi. The accused were involved in multiple cases under IPC Sections 353, 307, 397, 341, 294, 506-B, 323, and Arms Act Section 25, with convictions based on circumstantial evidence by the Sessions Court. State Of M. P. Through C. B. I. VS Paltan Mallah,etc. - Supreme Court, State of Madhay Pradesh VS Paltan Mallahetc. - Crimes, State of Madhay Pradesh VS Paltan Mallahetc. - Crimes
-
Landlord and Tenant Disputes under Rent Acts - The Supreme Court emphasized that landlords are the best judges of their bona fide need for eviction under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, and the Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. The courts should respect the landlord’s assessment without unwarranted interference. 02500045465, KANHAIYA MAL KASTURI LAL VS HARI PRASAD - Allahabad
-
Tax and Trade Regulations (Foreign Trade and VAT) - The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, and Karnataka VAT Act, 2003, were discussed concerning restrictions on imports and taxation. The constitutional validity of restrictions under Article 19(6) was acknowledged, indicating a balance between trade regulation and constitutional rights. Om Traders Rep. by its Proprietor Sri. Putta Swamy VS Union of India, Rep. by Secretary Ministry of Commerce and Industry - Karnataka
-
Corruption and Fraud Cases - Allegations of corruption involving Rs. 50 lakhs against Sesh Muni Ram, Regional Deputy Director, were examined, with documentary evidence such as bills from 1992 supporting the case under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC Sections. Dhruva Prasad Ojha VS State of Jharkhand through the C. B. I. - Jharkhand
Analysis and Conclusion: The sources collectively highlight key legal principles across insolvency, criminal, property, trade, and corruption law. The case Re a Firm of Solicitors 1992 1 All ER 353 appears to involve procedural and substantive issues in insolvency or company law, with the Court scrutinizing the circumstances for petition admission and appointment of provisional liquidators. The detailed references to procedural rules and statutory provisions suggest a focus on proper legal process in insolvency cases. Additionally, the references to criminal acquittals, landlord-tenant disputes, and trade regulations provide context for the broad scope of legal considerations relevant to the case.
Search Results for "Re a Firm of Solicitors 1992 1 all Er 353"
1992 0 Supreme(Bom) 581 • India - Bombay
D.R.DHANUKA
... See Companies Act 1956, Section 450 (1) ... Section 450 (1)-Companies Court Rules, 1959, Rule 106-Appointment of provisional liquidator-Circumstances when to be made-In appropriate ... The Court is just now informed that the admission of the Company Petition No. 353 of 1992 with the Company Petition No. 353 of 1992 is also assigned to this Court for the purpose of considering the question of admission of the petition. ... Meenaben Mahendrabhai Ghelani, practising Advocates and #HL....
2007 3 Supreme 268 • India - Supreme Court
LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA, ARIJIT PASAYAT
and the increase would be staggered over a period of 3 years it could not be explained as to why a firm data base could not be evolved ... If the stand of learned Additional Solicitor General is accepted that the exercise was not intended to be undertaken immediately ... Held : There is no dispute and in fact it was fairly accepted by learned Additional Solicitor ... If the stand of learned Additional Solicitor General is accepted that the exercise was not intended to be undertaken immediately and the increase would be....
2012 0 Supreme(All) 2160 • India - Allahabad
SUDHIR AGARWAL
Landlord - Release of Tenanted Building - Act, 1972, Section 21(1)(a) - Prativa Devi Vs. ... T.V.Krishnan (1996) 5 SCC 353, Shiv Sarup Gupta Vs. Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta, AIR 1999 SC 2507, R. C. Tamrakar Vs. ... He filed an application under Section 21(1)(a) of Act, 1972 (registered as U.P.U.B. Case No.5 of 1992), for release of the said building which is under the tenancy of respondents No.2 and 3. ... The respondent no.3 is said to be proprietor of firm M/s New Everlite Electrical Works which is running....
2005 1 Supreme 372 • India - Supreme Court
K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
The High Court, in our view, has given cogent and satisfying reasons for the acquittal of the accused A-1 to A-8. ... One of the circumstance relied is that A-1, A-4, A-5 and A-7 had a strong motive to do away with deceased Shankar Guha Niyogi. ... The accused A-1, A-3, A-4, A-5 and A-7 were found guilty by the Sessions Court on the basis of the circumstantial evidence adduced ... He was also involved in another case registered under Section 353, 307, 397, 341, 294, 506-B, 323 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act and he wa....
2018 0 Supreme(Kar) 1238 • India - Karnataka
B.VEERAPPA
Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Section 5 and 6, 6(3) - Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 ... quantitative restriction, if any per importer under provisions of Section 3 of Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 ... The learned Additional Solicitor General further contended that in view of Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, the claim is subject to Article 19(6) of the Constitution of India. ... Such a reasonable restriction was imposed in terms of the 1992#HL_E....
• India - Crimes
K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
The High Court, in our view, has given cogent and satisfying reasons for the acquittal of the accused A-1 to A-8. ... One of the circumstance relied is that A-1, A-4, A-5 and A-7 had a strong motive to do away with deceased Shankar Guha Niyogi. ... The accused A-1, A-3, A-4, A-5 and A-7 were found guilty by the Sessions Court on the basis of the circumstantial evidence adduced ... He was also involved in another case registered under Section 353, 307, 397, 341, 294, 506-B, 323 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act and he wa....
• India - Crimes
K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
The High Court, in our view, has given cogent and satisfying reasons for the acquittal of the accused A-1 to A-8. ... One of the circumstance relied is that A-1, A-4, A-5 and A-7 had a strong motive to do away with deceased Shankar Guha Niyogi. ... The accused A-1, A-3, A-4, A-5 and A-7 were found guilty by the Sessions Court on the basis of the circumstantial evidence adduced ... He was also involved in another case registered under Section 353, 307, 397, 341, 294, 506-B, 323 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act and he wa....
2018 0 Supreme(Jhk) 869 • India - Jharkhand
APARESH KUMAR SINGH
Penal Code, 1860 – Section 120-B read with Section 420 – Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1) ... Sesh Muni Ram, Regional Deputy Director, Dumka to the tune of Rs. 50.00 lakhs through letters dated 20.10.1992, 28.10.1992, 17.10.1992, 19.08.1992, 07.07.1992 and 04.07.1992. ... Photocopies of six bills pertaining to 4th July, 1992 to 20th October 1992 were given to Treasury Officer. ... The opinio....
2007 0 Supreme(P&H) 864 • India - Punjab and Haryana
VINOD K.SHARMA
Eviction - Personal Bonafide Need - East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Section 13 - Section 14(1)(e) Fact of ... Krishnan, 1996(5) SCC 353 has been pleased to lay down that the landlord is the best judge of his residential requirement. ... 25. ... The High Court need not be solicitous and venture in suggesting what would be more appropriate for the landlord to do. "That was the lookout of the appellant and not of the High Court. The gratuitous advice given by the High Court was uncalled for..... ... Firm Pre....
2012 0 Supreme(All) 2566 • India - Allahabad
SUDHIR AGARWAL
Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972—Section 21 (1) (a)—Eviction—Shop—Bona fide requirement of—Personnel ... Krishnan, (1996) 5 SCC 353. ... 12. ... Case No. 140 of 1991 under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. ... The petitioner No. 2, Jugal Kishore, is proprietor of petitioner No. 1 M/s Kanhayia Mal Kasturi Lal, a proprietorship firm. He died during pendency of the present writ petition and has been substituted by his legal heirs. ... 3. ... A new firm in ....
Filter by Legal Phrase
