In some cases, the courts have set aside or modified the sentence while maintaining the conviction, emphasizing the importance of considering mitigating factors and the accused's background (Pappu @ Shehjad son of Najir Mohd VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Saravanan VS State rep by The Inspector of Police, Vishnukanchi Police Station, Kanchieepuram - Madras).
Section 304A IPC - Main Points and Insights
In some instances (Pappu @ Shehjad son of Najir Mohd VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Ramesh VS State - Madras), the courts have ordered the accused to surrender within a specified period, or have partly allowed the revision petitions, setting aside or modifying the sentences while upholding the convictions.
General Trends and Insights
Several cases highlight the importance of considering the accused's conduct post-offence, their remorse, and circumstances like not fleeing the scene (02100055488, Pappu @ Shehjad son of Najir Mohd VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan).
Analysis and Conclusion
References: - Prakash Raj VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan - SURSING @ SURESH FATESING VASAVA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat - Suresh Kumar VS State - Crimes - Pappu @ Shehjad son of Najir Mohd VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan - Nitin Baghel VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan - MANOJ KUMAR VS STATE OF HARYANA - Punjab and Haryana - Ramesh VS State - Madras - Anthony Samy VS State by Inspector of Police, Salem District - Madras - SURESH KUMAR VS STATE OF DELHI - Delhi - Saravanan VS State rep by The Inspector of Police, Vishnukanchi Police Station, Kanchieepuram - Madras
Final Decision: The court partly allowed the revision petition and reduced the sentence of the accused under Section 304A ... Fact of the Case: The accused-petitioner, a bus driver, was convicted under Sections 279 and 304A of the Indian Penal ... For the offence under Section 279 IPC, the accused was sentenced to the period of custody already served. ... If the amount of not deposited within the aforesaid time, the learned Judic....
(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 279 and 304A - Bombay Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 177 and 184 - Revision application against ... considered mitigating factors, leading to a reduction in sentencing to three months for significant punishment - It was directed that sentences ... �In the above view of the matter, this revision application stands allowed to the following extent: 1. ... that ends of justice would be met if the sentence of imprisonment is re....
IPC was upheld but u/s 279 & sentence was set aside - Revision - Petitioner suddenly drove bus while deceased passenger was boarding ... allowed accordingly. ... Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 279 and 304A - Petitioner convicted for offences by trial court - On appeal conviction u/ s 304A ... In the end he contends that the petitioner should have been given the benefit of probation and in any case the #HL_START....
Final Decision: The court partly allowed the revision petition, acquitting the accused-petitioner under Section ... the conviction and sentence of the accused-petitioner under various sections of the IPC. ... Revision Petition - Criminal Conviction - Sections 279, 337, 338, 304A, 379 of IPC - The judgment discusses ... In view of the above, the criminal revision petition of the accused-petitioner....
and fine increased to Rs. 50,000/- Sentence and fine passed for offence u/Sec. 279 IPC remains unaltered — Sentence to run concurrently ... Penal Code, Sec. 279, 337 and 304-A — In revision petition contention is that benefit of probation be given ... u/Sec. 304-A I.P.C. — Petitioner is not a professional driver — Petitioner not flee from the place of occurrence, his vehicle swayed ... The present revision petition....
undergone by the petitioner. ... the period already undergone by the petitioner. ... Final Decision: The court partly allowed the petition, upholding the conviction but reducing the sentence to the period already ... He further submits that petitioner is the only bread winner of the family. He would next contend that hardly any period is left to be undergone by the petitioner because of which the sentenc....
Case Allowed ... is sufficient to fix revision petitioner as person who drove offending vehicle - Whether act of accused was rash or negligent which ... undergo two years Simple Imprisonment for offence under Section 304 (A) of IPC - Period of sentence was ordered to run concurrently ... Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is partly allowed. The revision petitioner shall surrender before the trial Court within a period of 30 d....
under Section 279 IPC, but allowed leniency in the sentence considering the period already undergone and the family circumstances ... leniency in the sentence for the offence under Section 279 IPC. ... Finding of the Court: The court confirmed the conviction and sentence imposed by the lower courts but allowed leniency ... ... (c) The period of sentence already undergone by th....
304A - Petitioner convicted for offences by trial court - On appeal conviction u/ s 304A IPC was upheld ... In the end, he contends that the petitioner should have been given the benefit of probation and in any case the petitioner has undergone imprisonment for over three months and in the circumstances he may be released on the sentence already undergone. ... ... ( 17 ) THIS revision petition is accordingly allowed. ... However, t....
Final Decision: The court allowed the revision in part, setting aside the conviction under Section 279 IPC and modifying the ... a revision petition. ... sentence under Section 304A IPC. ... In the result, the revision is allowed in part and the conviction and sentence imposed on the revision petitioner under Section 279 IPC in C.A.No.125 of 2....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.