AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Section 279 IPC - Main Points and Insights
  • Convictions under Section 279 IPC (rash or negligent driving) have been upheld in several cases, but courts often exercise leniency in sentencing based on circumstances such as the period already undergone, the accused's family situation, and whether the accused is a professional driver or not. For example, in Prakash Raj VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, the court reduced the sentence considering the period already served. Similarly, in Anthony Samy VS State by Inspector of Police, Salem District - Madras, leniency was granted, and the sentence was reduced or set aside based on these factors.
  • In some cases, the courts have set aside or modified the sentence while maintaining the conviction, emphasizing the importance of considering mitigating factors and the accused's background (Pappu @ Shehjad son of Najir Mohd VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Saravanan VS State rep by The Inspector of Police, Vishnukanchi Police Station, Kanchieepuram - Madras).

  • Section 304A IPC - Main Points and Insights

  • The offence under Section 304A (causing death by negligence) is often confirmed, but courts have varied in their sentencing approach, sometimes reducing or modifying it based on the facts of the case. For example, in Prakash Raj VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan and Nitin Baghel VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, the courts confirmed the conviction but reduced the sentence, considering the period already undergone and the accused's circumstances.
  • In some instances (Pappu @ Shehjad son of Najir Mohd VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Ramesh VS State - Madras), the courts have ordered the accused to surrender within a specified period, or have partly allowed the revision petitions, setting aside or modifying the sentences while upholding the convictions.

  • General Trends and Insights

  • Courts tend to balance the severity of the offence with mitigating factors such as the accused's family responsibilities, the period already served, and whether the accused was a professional driver.
  • The principle of justice often leads to reduction or modification of sentences rather than outright acquittal, especially when the conviction is upheld.
  • Several cases highlight the importance of considering the accused's conduct post-offence, their remorse, and circumstances like not fleeing the scene (02100055488, Pappu @ Shehjad son of Najir Mohd VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan).

  • Analysis and Conclusion

  • The judicial approach to offences under Sections 279 and 304A IPC reflects a nuanced balance between accountability and compassion, with courts frequently reducing sentences or allowing modifications based on mitigating factors.
  • While conviction under these sections is generally upheld, the sentences are often adjusted to serve justice fairly, considering the accused's background and the specifics of each case.
  • These decisions underscore the importance of individualized assessment in criminal cases involving road accidents and negligence.

References: - Prakash Raj VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan - SURSING @ SURESH FATESING VASAVA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat - Suresh Kumar VS State - Crimes - Pappu @ Shehjad son of Najir Mohd VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan - Nitin Baghel VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan - MANOJ KUMAR VS STATE OF HARYANA - Punjab and Haryana - Ramesh VS State - Madras - Anthony Samy VS State by Inspector of Police, Salem District - Madras - SURESH KUMAR VS STATE OF DELHI - Delhi - Saravanan VS State rep by The Inspector of Police, Vishnukanchi Police Station, Kanchieepuram - Madras

Search Results for "Revision Allowed Petitioner Left on Undergone Sentence in 279 Ipc"

Prakash Raj VS State of Rajasthan

1987 0 Supreme(Raj) 494 India - Rajasthan

JASRAJ CHOPRA

Final Decision: The court partly allowed the revision petition and reduced the sentence of the accused under Section 304A ... Fact of the Case: The accused-petitioner, a bus driver, was convicted under Sections 279 and 304A of the Indian Penal ... For the offence under Section 279 IPC, the accused was sentenced to the period of custody already served. ... If the amount of not deposited within the aforesaid time, the learned Judic....

SURSING @ SURESH FATESING VASAVA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT

India - Gujarat High Court

J.R. VORA, J

(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 279 and 304A - Bombay Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 177 and 184 - Revision application against ... considered mitigating factors, leading to a reduction in sentencing to three months for significant punishment - It was directed that sentences ... �In the above view of the matter, this revision application stands allowed to the following extent: 1. ... that ends of justice would be met if the sentence of imprisonment is re....

Suresh Kumar VS State

India - Crimes

J.B.GOEL

IPC was upheld but u/s 279 & sentence was set aside - Revision - Petitioner suddenly drove bus while deceased passenger was boarding ... allowed accordingly. ... Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 279 and 304A - Petitioner convicted for offences by trial court - On appeal conviction u/ s 304A ... In the end he contends that the petitioner should have been given the benefit of probation and in any case the #HL_START....

Pappu @ Shehjad son of Najir Mohd VS State of Rajasthan

2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 232 India - Rajasthan

PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Final Decision: The court partly allowed the revision petition, acquitting the accused-petitioner under Section ... the conviction and sentence of the accused-petitioner under various sections of the IPC. ... Revision Petition - Criminal Conviction - Sections 279, 337, 338, 304A, 379 of IPC - The judgment discusses ... In view of the above, the criminal revision petition of the accused-petitioner....

Nitin Baghel VS State of Rajasthan

2018 0 Supreme(Raj) 1461 India - Rajasthan

PANKAJ BHANDARI

and fine increased to Rs. 50,000/- Sentence and fine passed for offence u/Sec. 279 IPC remains unaltered — Sentence to run concurrently ... Penal Code, Sec. 279, 337 and 304-A — In revision petition contention is that benefit of probation be given ... u/Sec. 304-A I.P.C. — Petitioner is not a professional driver — Petitioner not flee from the place of occurrence, his vehicle swayed ... The present revision petition....

MANOJ KUMAR VS STATE OF HARYANA

2015 0 Supreme(P&H) 2057 India - Punjab and Haryana

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK

undergone by the petitioner. ... the period already undergone by the petitioner. ... Final Decision: The court partly allowed the petition, upholding the conviction but reducing the sentence to the period already ... He further submits that petitioner is the only bread winner of the family. He would next contend that hardly any period is left to be undergone by the petitioner because of which the sentenc....

Ramesh VS State

2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 1437 India - Madras

G.JAYACHANDRAN

Case Allowed ... is sufficient to fix revision petitioner as person who drove offending vehicle - Whether act of accused was rash or negligent which ... undergo two years Simple Imprisonment for offence under Section 304 (A) of IPC - Period of sentence was ordered to run concurrently ... Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is partly allowed. The revision petitioner shall surrender before the trial Court within a period of 30 d....

Anthony Samy VS State by Inspector of Police, Salem District

2011 0 Supreme(Mad) 2433 India - Madras

R.MALA

under Section 279 IPC, but allowed leniency in the sentence considering the period already undergone and the family circumstances ... leniency in the sentence for the offence under Section 279 IPC. ... Finding of the Court: The court confirmed the conviction and sentence imposed by the lower courts but allowed leniency ... ... (c) The period of sentence already undergone by th....

SURESH KUMAR VS STATE OF DELHI

1998 0 Supreme(Del) 548 India - Delhi

B.GOEL

304A - Petitioner convicted for offences by trial court - On appeal conviction u/ s 304A IPC was upheld ... In the end, he contends that the petitioner should have been given the benefit of probation and in any case the petitioner has undergone imprisonment for over three months and in the circumstances he may be released on the sentence already undergone. ... ... ( 17 ) THIS revision petition is accordingly allowed. ... However, t....

Saravanan VS State rep by The Inspector of Police, Vishnukanchi Police Station, Kanchieepuram

2007 0 Supreme(Mad) 1707 India - Madras

A.C.ARUMUGAPERUMAL ADITYAN

Final Decision: The court allowed the revision in part, setting aside the conviction under Section 279 IPC and modifying the ... a revision petition. ... sentence under Section 304A IPC. ... In the result, the revision is allowed in part and the conviction and sentence imposed on the revision petitioner under Section 279 IPC in C.A.No.125 of 2....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top