AI Overview...
-
Sale Deeds & Payment Clarity - Both sale deeds (Ex.1 and Ex.2) clearly state that no dues remain after the receipt of specified cheques, supporting the conclusion that the transactions were settled fully at the time of execution Pappu Singh Son Of Narayan Singh Ji Rajpoot VS Prahlad Sen Son Of Badri Lal Sen - Rajasthan.
-
Legal Precedents & Jurisprudence - Various judgments, including Nihaldei (SC 1954), Kanhaiya Lal Meghwal (2019), and Gokaraju Rangaraju (2014), establish principles related to property disputes, election cases, and contractual obligations, emphasizing the importance of clear documentation and legal procedures Ghanshyam Gurjar VS Hemant Singh - Rajasthan.
-
Arbitration & Work Orders - Rajasthan Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd. case (2007 SCC) highlights that the appellant had already handed over the final bill by 1983, which is crucial in determining the cause of action related to arbitration applications and work-related disputes M/s Garg Construction Company VS State Of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana.
-
Consumer Protection & Real Estate - Sections 2(1)(g), 2(1)(o), and 14(1)(e) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, are applicable in real estate cases, emphasizing rights related to unfair trade practices and consumer rights in property transactions Wg. Cdr. Arifur Rahman Khan and Aleya Sultana VS DLF Southern Homes Pvt Ltd (now Known as BEGUR OMR Homes Pvt. Ltd. ) - Supreme Court.
-
Civil Procedure & Pre-emption Laws - Orders under CPC (Order 6 Rule 17, 41 Rule 27) and the Rajasthan Pre-emption Act (Section 11) are significant in property disputes, with courts upholding the validity of sale deeds and pre-emption rights based on evidence presented Kunj Behari Lal S/o Late Shri Damodar Lal VS Kewal Chand S/o Shri Rikhab Chand - Rajasthan.
-
Compensation for Disability - The case of Raj Kumar v. Ajay Kumar (2011) SCC 343 clarifies principles for awarding compensation in cases of permanent physical disability, considering the impact on the claimant's occupation and livelihood SRI ANTHONY alias ANTHONY SWAMY VS MANAGING DIRECTOR, K. S. R. T. C. - Supreme Court.
-
Fundamental Rights & Public Interest - Supreme Court cases (e.g., Union of India 2017) affirm that rights such as privacy are not absolute and may be restricted for public interest, especially in contexts like land rights and privacy concerns 01700063789.
-
Gaming & Gambling Laws - The 2020 Rajasthan case (RLW 3322) discusses the legality of online fantasy sports, ruling that such activities may amount to gambling/betting under law, thus subject to governmental regulation ALL INDIA GAMING FEDERATION, THANE VS STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka.
-
Property & Succession Laws - Judgments (e.g., AIR 2020 SC 4321, RLW 2005) address issues like tenant rights, succession, and the validity of defense claims, emphasizing the importance of proper legal procedures in property disputes Firm Dhanraj Dev Kishan VS Sriniwas son of late Shri Ramchandra - Rajasthan.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The sources collectively highlight key legal principles related to property transactions, contractual clarity, dispute resolution, consumer rights, and regulatory boundaries. They underscore the importance of documented agreements, adherence to procedural laws, and the balancing of individual rights with public interest. The case of Rlw Raj 2020 (likely referencing the SC decision in 2020) aligns with these principles by emphasizing lawful conduct, clarity in transactions, and the limits of rights when balanced against societal needs.
Search Results for "Rlw Raj 2020 1 244"
2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1801 • India - Rajasthan
SANDEEP MEHTA
Thus, the issue No.1 deserves to be decided against the plaintiff and in favour of the defendants. 23. Issue No.2 is dependent on the conclusion of the issue No.1. ... The recital at para No.1 from both the sale deeds (Ex.2 and Ex.1) conveys that no amount would remain due to the purchaser after receiving the amount covered by the cheque No.324159 and cheque No.324160 respectively which were being handed over to the seller at the time of execution of the sale deeds ... It was averred in the plaint that two sale deeds we....
2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 1735 • India - Rajasthan
MAHENDRA KUMAR GOYAL
Nihaldei - 1954 SC 340, 1964 RLW (Raj) 1, 2016 (4) WLN 513 (Raj.), 2017 (2) WLC (Raj.) 275 Fact of the Case: The petitioner ... District Judge, Bikaner cum Election Tribunal, Bikaner & Ors.- 2018 (1) WLN 338 (Raj.); 5) Kanhaiya Lal Meghwal v. The District Judge, Balotra & Ors.-( 2019 (1) RLW 819 (Raj.); 6) Gokaraju Rangaraju v. State of A.P. ... Modern Construction & Co.- (2014) 1 SCC 648; 2) Kes....
2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 841 • India - Punjab and Haryana
RAVI SHANKER JHA
'244.4. ... Rajasthan Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd., 2007 SCC OnLine Raj 97 : (2008) 1 RLW 429] that the appellant itself had handed over the final bill to the respondent on 8-2-1983. Hence, the holding in Inder Singh Rekhi [Inder Singh Rekhi v. ... Rajasthan Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd., 2007 SCC OnLine Raj 97 : (2008) 1 RLW 429] that the appellant's cause of action in respect of Arbitration Applications Nos. 25/2003 and 27/2003, relating to the work orders dated 7-10-1979 ....
2020 4 Supreme 466 • India - Supreme Court
D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, K.M.JOSEPH
(Paras 21, 22 and 23) (B) Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Sections 2(1)(g), 2(1)(o) and 14(1)(e) – Real estate ... (Paras 24 and 26) (C) Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Sections 2(1)(g), 2(1)(o) and 14(1)(e) – Real estate ... (A) Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 12(1)(c) – Real estate ... The relevant portion of clause 1.6 is extracted below: "1.6. ... State of Karnataka, (2014)1 SCC 708. ... ....
2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 478 • India - Rajasthan
SUDESH BANSAL
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Order 6 Rule 17, Order 41Rule 27, Section 96 - Rajasthan Pre-emption Act, 1966 - Section 11 (1) ... , 5 (1) (a), 15, 21 - Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 97, 113,10 - Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 - Section 21-A - Sale Deed - Right ... are not under challenge nor have been disputed by learned counsel for plaintiff in first appeal - Defendant No.1 has proved that ... Nand Kishore [(1980) RLW 650] and Maganbai and Jambu Kumar, LRs. Of Magan Lal Vs. ... Radha Mohan (D) through LRs. [(202....
2020 3 Supreme 449 • India - Supreme Court
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, NAVIN SINHA, B.R.GAVAI
Raj Kumar vs. Ajay Kumar and another, 2011 (1) SCC 343 lucidly sets out the principles for grant of compensation in cases of permanent physical functional disability as follows: “10. ... Our view is supported by the ratio in Raj Kumar and from the fact that the appellant is severely hampered and perhaps forever handicapped from performing his occupation as a coolie.” 1.
• India - Current Civil Cases
SUDESH BANSAL
Nand Kishore [(1980) RLW 650] and Maganbai and Jambu Kumar, LRs. Of Magan Lal Vs. ... Rampadarath Singh & Ors., Etc [AIR (1969) SC 244]. There is no disagreement about such proposition of law as expounded in judgments referred hereinabove. ... Radha Mohan (D) through LRs. [(2020) SCC Online SC 828] wherein the provisions of Section 21 of the Act of 1963 and Article 97 of the Limitation Act, 1963 were discussed. ... Poonam Chand [(1954) RLW 292], Division Bench held as:— “We are of opinion that the contention of learned....
2019 7 Supreme 292 • India - Supreme Court
RANJAN GOGOI, DEEPAK GUPTA, SANJIV KHANNA
... 1. Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Nos. 9671 of 2017, 1048 of 2018, 2225 of 2018 and 3272 of 2018. ... 2. Criminal Appeal No.2003 of 2012. ... Union of India and others, (2017) 10 SCC 1 the fundamental right to privacy cannot be construed as absolute and but must bow down to compelling public interest. ... State of Bihar” ((1975) 1 SCC 774) is deemed appropriate. ... The appellant in the above case was the owner of a plot of land measuring about 3.30 acres located in the district of Purnea in Bihar. ... ... “(#HL_....
2022 0 Supreme(Kar) 326 • India - Karnataka
RITU RAJ AWASTHI, DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD
(a) and 19(1)(g), leading to excessive governmental control. ... The amendment unconstitutionally restricted the right to play games of skill, infringing upon rights protected under Articles 19(1) ... Union of India and Others: 2020 (4) RLW 3322 (Raj) was considering in PIL jurisdiction as to whether online fantasy sports/games offered on dream 11 platform amounted to gambling/betting. Having inter alia referred to Chamarbaugwala and K.R. ... No. 13714/2020 between Sharada D.R. vs. Sta....
2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 153 • India - Rajasthan
DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
244. ... Kamala, reported in AIR 2020 SC 4321; 6. Kantilal and Ors. v. LRs of Deepchand and ors., reported in 2015 (3) DNJ (Raj.) 1308; 7. Kotha Seshamma and Ors. v. ... Mandir Shri Thakurji Sangria & Anr. reported in 2005 (2) RLW Rajasthan 1114, Head Note B and Kanti Lal v. Legal Representatives of late Smt. Chand Kumari reported in 2004 (2) RLW 1190. 125. ... Vijay Narayan, reported in 2005 (4) RLW 2288 which is related to striking out of defence tenant. 124. ... LR's of Deepchand &....
Filter by Legal Phrase
