AI Overview...
-
Rohini Sudarshan Gangurde - The case involves Rohini Sudarshan Gangurde challenging a Bombay High Court order dated 05.09.2023 in Criminal Revision Application No. 410 of 2022. The case details her love affair and marriage with Sudarshan, which was against family wishes, and subsequent events involving her husband Ashok Gangurde and her deceased husband Sudarshan Rohini Sudarshan Gangurde VS State of Maharashtra - Supreme Court.
-
Supreme Court Observation - In the 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1701 judgment, the Supreme Court examined Sections 306 and 107 IPC, providing interpretative insights relevant to the case, emphasizing legal principles related to abetment and criminal liability Krishnan vs State - Madras, Dhala Ram vs State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Mangal Singh, S/o Sh. Babu Singh vs State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp - Rajasthan.
-
Legal Precedents - The case references judgments such as Shanmugasekar v. The State of Tamil Nadu (2024 SAR (Cri) 1027), which the Supreme Court cited, indicating the importance of understanding criminal liability and mental state in similar cases Sivasankara Velu vs State of Tamilnadu rep. by The Inspector of Police - Madras.
-
Court's Analysis - The Supreme Court’s observations in Rohini’s case focus on the legal interpretation of complicity under IPC, especially Sections 306 and 107, and the circumstances under which criminal liability is established, including the mental element and actus reus involved Sivasankara Velu Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep. By The Inspector Of Police - Madras.
-
Overall Insights - The case underscores the significance of contextual and factual analysis in criminal liability, especially in cases involving personal relationships, mental health, and alleged abetment, with the Supreme Court clarifying legal principles applicable to such situations Rohini Sudarshan Gangurde VS State of Maharashtra - Supreme Court, Mangal Singh, S/o Sh. Babu Singh vs State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp - Rajasthan.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Rohini Sudarshan Gangurde’s case is a notable legal matter involving complex issues of personal relationships, mental health, and criminal liability under IPC. The Supreme Court’s detailed interpretation of Sections 306 and 107 provides critical guidance on assessing abetment and mental culpability, emphasizing the need for clear evidence of intent and actus reus. The case highlights the importance of judicial scrutiny in cases of alleged abetment, especially when intertwined with personal and emotional factors.
Search Results for "Rohini Sudarshan"
2024 5 Supreme 577 • India - Supreme Court
VIKRAM NATH, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
This appeal is preferred by the accused Appellant-Rohini Sudarshan Gangurde challenging the impugned order of Bombay High Court dated 05.09.2023 in Criminal Revision Application No. 410 of 2022. ... 3.2 Appellant Rohini and deceased Sudarshan had a love affair which turned into marriage on 09.03.2015 against the will of family members of both of them. The couple started residing separately at Shingnapur in Kolhapur. ... When her husband-Ashok Gangurde stayed at the house of deceased in May 2019, he told her that accused....
• India - Appellate Side,Bombay
2025 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 7440 • India - High Court of Rajasthan (Jodhpur Bench)
Manoj Kumar Garg, J
In case of Rohini Sudarshan Gangurde v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. reported in 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1701, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has observed as under: “8.
2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65161 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J
In the case of Rohini Sudarshan Gangurde Vs. State of Maharastra and Another reported in 2024 SCC online 1701, the Supreme Court has observed:- “8. ...
2025 0 Supreme(SC) 131 • India - Supreme Court
B. V. NAGARATHNA, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
The Appellant has placed strong reliance upon the judgment in Rohini Sudarshan Gangurde vs. State of Maharashtra and Another, 2024 SCC Online SC 1701 wherein this Court has interpreted Sections 306 and 107 IPC together and observed: “8.
2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 8702 • India - High Court of Rajasthan (Jodhpur Bench)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
In case of Rohini Sudarshan Gangurde v. State of Maharashtra and Another Reported in 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1701, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has observed as under: “8.
2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 3417 • India - BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
P.VADAMALAI, J
Sudarshan Gangude /v/ The State of Maharashtra and Anr.) ... of “ Shanmugasekar /v/ The State of Tamil Nadu) (5) 2024 SAR (Cri) 1027 of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of “ Rohini
2025 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 13195 • India - BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
P.VADAMALAI, J
Sudarshan Gangude /v/ The State of Maharashtra and Anr.) ... of “ Shanmugasekar /v/ The State of Tamil Nadu) (5) 2024 SAR (Cri) 1027 of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of “ Rohini
2025 0 Supreme(P&H) 6 • India - Punjab and Haryana
SANJAY VASHISTH
In support of his submissions, counsel relies upon the following judgments rendered by Hon’ble the Apex Court and by this Court:- (i) Rohini Sudarshan Gangurde v. ... In Rohini Sudarshan Gangurde’s case (supra), husband of the petitioner – wife therein, had committed suicide and the Hon’ble Apex Court while dealing with the application for discharge, noticed as under:- “9. In S.S. Chheena v.
2025 0 Supreme(Raj) 1797 • India - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
In case of Rohini Sudarshan Gangurde v. State of Maharashtra and Another Reported in 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1701, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has observed as under: “8.
Filter by Legal Phrase
