AI Overview

AI Overview...

Routing at Different Places Accused Cannot be Linked to All Offences

  • Jurisdiction in Continuing Offences - A continuing offence committed across multiple locations can be prosecuted at any of those places where part of the offence occurred. The court's jurisdiction is not limited to the place of the accused's residence or arrest but extends to all relevant locations where the offence took place. This principle ensures that cases involving multiple locations are properly addressed, emphasizing that jurisdiction is determined by where parts of the offence occurred Merry Bina Marak VS State of Meghalaya - Crimes.

  • Linking Accused to Offences - Merely being present at different locations or conducting searches in various compartments (e.g., trains) does not automatically establish the accused’s involvement in all offences committed across those locations. Specific evidence connecting the accused to each offence is necessary; random searches or presence alone are insufficient to link all offences to a single accused Md. Sarfraj VS State of Bihar - Crimes.

  • Multiple Offences and Accused - In cases involving multiple accused and offences, courts have emphasized that guilt must be established based on concrete evidence relating to each accused’s role. Accused cannot be presumed guilty of all offences solely based on their presence or association with others in different locations Harish Natvarlal Mistryetc. etc. VS State of Gujarat - Crimes.

  • Different Places, Different Offences - Courts have clarified that offences committed at different places cannot automatically be attributed to all accused persons collectively. Each offence must be linked to the specific accused involved, and jurisdiction must be appropriate to the location where each offence occurred Nalinikanta Muduli VS State of Orissa - Orissa.

  • Legal Principles on Jurisdiction and Accused’s Link - The overarching principle is that an accused cannot be linked to all offences committed across various locations unless there is direct evidence tying them to each specific offence. Jurisdiction is primarily determined by where the offence or part of the offence occurred, not merely where the accused was present or where searches occurred Merry Bina Marak VS State of Meghalaya - Crimes.

Analysis and Conclusion

The sources collectively highlight that jurisdiction in criminal cases involving multiple locations is determined by the place where each offence or part thereof occurred, not solely where the accused resides or is arrested. Accused persons cannot be automatically linked to all offences committed across different places without concrete evidence. This underscores the importance of location-specific evidence and the principle that each offence must be proved to have been committed by the accused at the relevant place. Therefore, routing or linking an accused to all offences across various locations without proper evidence is legally untenable.

References: - Merry Bina Marak VS State of Meghalaya - Crimes - Md. Sarfraj VS State of Bihar - Crimes - Harish Natvarlal Mistryetc. etc. VS State of Gujarat - Crimes - Nalinikanta Muduli VS State of Orissa - Orissa

Search Results for "Routing at Different Places Accused Cannot be Linked to all the Offences"

Merry Bina Marak VS State of Meghalaya

India - Crimes

MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR

is a continuing offence committed in different places but case is registered at one place, in such a situation, place of occurrence ... can be at all places where part occurrence has taken place, so in such a situation, jurisdiction of Court cannot be confined to ... and not the place where accused resides or place where accused apprehends arrest. ... The question of jurisdiction....

Kul Parkash Bhardwaj VS State of H. P.

2011 0 Supreme(HP) 877 India - Himachal Pradesh

DEV DARSHAN SUD

It highlighted that mere possession of cash is not an offence unless linked to a proven illegal activity. ... Bail - Offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B and 489-A IPC - Summary of Acts and Sections: IPC Sections 419, ... Fact of the Case: The petitioner was arrested for various offences related to possession and transportation of a large ... Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972 and more especially Section 118 of the Act it would be open to the State Government to take appropriate action in accordance w....

Md. Sarfraj VS State of Bihar

India - Crimes

SACHCHIDANAND JHA, B.N.P.SINGH

In the instant case, it is true, random search was con­ducted in different compartments of the train but after the appellant was ... (i) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 50 — Recovery of 1.5 kg of charas from possession of accused ... noticed accused appellant in a frightened posture & found some article wrapped & tied around his waist — Appellant was taken to ... In the instant case, it is true, random search was con­ducted in different compartments of the train but after the appellant w....

Raja Paper & Board Mill & Others VS K. Sheikshindha

2003 0 Supreme(Mad) 616 India - Madras

V.KANAGARAJ

the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme, 1952, para. 4 of the Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995 and para.8 of the Employees' Deposit linked ... Insurance Scheme, 1976 - Summary Fact of the Case: The petitioners, accused in criminal cases for non-payment of contributions ... Ratio Decidendi: The petitioners' failure to pay routine contributions and administrative charges without convincing reasons ... accused No.2 at the time of sampling." ... ... In that case the averments in the complaint reads as follows: ... "That the #....

Harish Natvarlal Mistryetc. etc.  VS State of Gujarat

India - Crimes

K.G.SHAH, K.R.VYAS

the concern accused in the court, cannot be the basis for finding that particular accused guilty. ... No. 1 to accused No. 13 alongwith 39 others were lined up in the court of the Executive Magistrate Mr. ... 5), Rakesh Bhatt (accused No. 7), Ilesh Patel (accused No. 8), Sunil Panchal (accused No. 10), Yogesh Patel (accused No. 11) and ... The case of Boota Singh was entirely on different facts. ... Shailesh and Sa....

Nalinikanta Muduli VS State of Orissa

2004 0 Supreme(Ori) 85 India - Orissa

M.PAPANNA

. - Offences under Secs. 120-B/420/468/471, IPC and Sec. 13(2), 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Contrac¬tor’s licence ... or make out a case against the accused - To prevent abuse of process of Court and to secure ends of justice exercising judi¬cial ... CRIMINAL PROCEEDING - A criminal proceeding against an accused can be quashed in the initial stage only when on the face of the complaint ... It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that his father being a public servant was roped in Vigilance Case with a view to impl....

T. Prabhakar Rao vs State of Telangana

2025 0 Supreme(Telangana) 352 India - IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

J.SREENIVAS RAO

The petitioner claimed he was falsely accused and had resigned before the alleged incidents. ... remedy, particularly in serious offences involving public trust and sensitive information - The court noted the necessity of the ... contended that he was falsely implicated and had resigned prior to the alleged destruction of records, asserting no direct evidence linked ... offences. ... It was held that the expression “entrusted” has wide and different implication in different contexts an....

Mukesh Mittal S/o Late Babu Lal Mittal VS Union of India through Directorate of Enforcement

2024 0 Supreme(Jhk) 110 India - Jharkhand

SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

Section 438 - Anticipatory bail application in relation to money laundering allegations - Allegations against the petitioner involve routing ... The petitioner, a Chartered Accountant, is implicated in a case involving laundering proceeds of crime associated with bribery linked ... The nature of allegations as grave as involvement in laundering funds from a scheduled offence requires strict scrutiny before granting ... Economic offences stand as a different class as they affect the economic fabric of th....

Akshay Kailash Purohit VS State of Maharashtra, Through P S O, Police Station Telhara, Tahsil Telhara, Akola

2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 610 India - Bombay

Z.A.HAQ, VINAY JOSHI

No.1 and Accused No.2, were charged for offences punishable under Sections 363, 364A, 302, 201, 120B read with Section 34 of The ... It has further been held that the death sentence should be imposed when the option to impose sentence of imprisonment for life cannot ... cannot be reformed. – There is no material to hold that it is a crime of extreme brutality and would shatter social fabric. – Court ... Different quantum of sentences have been awarded for the proved offences, and direc....

Subhash Bahadur @ Upender VS State (N. C. T.  of Delhi)

India - Crimes

VIBHU BAKHRU

to custody – Such power must be traced to an express provision of law – Accused cannot be released on bail by a court on its own ... is not entitled to such bail – Proviso to Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C. is intrinsically linked to right under Article 21 of Constitution ... motion and it is necessary for accused to apply and offer to furnish bail – If accused offers to furnish bail he would comply with ... There is no dispute that an accused cannot be released on bail by ....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top