AI Overview...

Samrat Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Dolly George - The Supreme Court examined issues related to the authority of individuals filing complaints on behalf of a company, emphasizing that dismissing a complaint solely on the grounds of lack of proper authorization or failure to produce certified copies of resolutions at the initial stage is unjustified. The Court highlighted that such procedural issues should not lead to dismissal without proper adjudication on the merits. Samrat Shipping Company Private LTD. VS Dolly George - Supreme Court, GANGA RAM SINGH VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad, Ganga Ram Singh VS State of U. P. - Dishonour Of Cheque, DEBSON PUMPS PVT LTD VS GAUHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION - Gauhati, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited, Ranchi VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand, Ab. Rasheed Bhat VS HDFC Bank Ltd. - Jammu and Kashmir, FRAGRANT LEASING AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD VS JAGDISH KATURIYA - Allahabad, Fragrant Leasing and Finance Company Ltd. VS Jagdish Katuriya - Dishonour Of Cheque, S. Shagunthala Devi VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat, FRAGRANT LEASING AND FINANCE CO. LTD VS JAGDISH KATURIYA - Allahabad
Main Points and Insights:
The case dealt with the authority of individuals (e.g., Dolly George) to file complaints on behalf of Samrat Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd.
The Supreme Court ruled that dismissing complaints at the threshold due to procedural deficiencies, such as lack of certified resolutions, is not justified unless the authority is clearly lacking.
The judgment underscores the importance of examining the substance of the case rather than dismissing on technicalities prematurely.
It clarifies that procedural lapses can be remedied and should not lead to automatic dismissal, promoting fair judicial process.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The case establishes that courts should not dismiss complaints solely based on procedural technicalities like missing authorization documents unless such deficiencies are fundamental.
This decision emphasizes the need for courts to consider the merits and allow for procedural corrections, ensuring justice is not denied on technical grounds.
The ruling is significant in the context of corporate litigation, reaffirming that proper authorization is essential but can be established during the course of proceedings rather than as a strict prerequisite at the outset.

Search Results for "Samrat Shipping Dolly George"

Samrat Shipping Company Private LTD. VS Dolly George

1999 0 Supreme(SC) 1472 • India - Supreme Court

K.T.THOMAS, M.B.SHAH

2005 0 Supreme(All) 1170 • India - Allahabad

POONAM SRIVASTAVA

Samrat shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Dolly George, (1999)10 JT (SC) 381.

• India - Dishonour Of Cheque

POONAM SRIVASTAVA

Samrat Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Dolly George2.

DEBSON PUMPS PVT LTD VS GAUHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

2018 0 Supreme(Gau) 1237 • India - Gauhati

A.K.GOSWAMI

The decision in Samrat Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd. ... In support of his submissions, he places reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the cases of Samrat Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Dolly George, reported in (2002) 9 SCC 455, National Small Industries Corporation Limited v.

Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited, Ranchi VS State of Jharkhand

2018 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1754 • India - Jharkhand

APARESH KUMAR SINGH, RATNAKER BHENGRA

Ltd. had to some extent tried to raise issue of question of power of attorney holder - Issue addressed in Shipping Co. Pvt. ... such witness or CW-1 could then legally prove or disprove anything is an important question - Finally case cited by petitioner Shipping ... Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Limited reported in (2017) 1 SCC (Cri) 149 (iv) Samrat Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dolly George reported in (2002) 9 SCC 455. (v) Kishan Rao Vs. ... Finally the case cited by the p....

2022 0 Supreme(J&K) 251 • India - Jammu and Kashmir

SANJAY DHAR

This question, in the background of the case where the complainant was a company, has been considered by the Supreme Court in the case of Samrat Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dolly George, (2002) 9 SCC 455. ... As noted in Samrat Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd (supra) , dismissal of a complaint at the threshold by the Magistrate on the question of authorisation, would not be justified.

FRAGRANT LEASING AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD VS JAGDISH KATURIYA

2007 0 Supreme(All) 1745 • India - Allahabad

M.K.MITTAL

... ( 17 ) IN the case of Samrat Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. ... Dolly George, 2003 SCC (Cri)1224, it was observer by the Honble Apex court that the dismissal of the complaint at the threshold by the learned Magistrate on the ground that the individual through whom the complaint was filed, failed to produce the certified copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors

• India - Dishonour Of Cheque

M.K.MITTAL

In the case of Samrat Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. ... Dolly George3 it was observed by the Hon’ble Apex Court that the dismissal of the complaint at the threshold by the learned Magistrate on the ground that the individual through whom the complaint was filed, failed to produce the certified copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors authorizing that

2018 0 Supreme(Guj) 1095 • India - Gujarat

VIPUL M.PANCHOLI

At this stage, the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Samrat Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd vs. Dolly George reported in, (2002) 9 SCC 455 is required to be referred to. In paragraph-3 of the said decision, it is held as under: ... "3.

FRAGRANT LEASING AND FINANCE CO. LTD VS JAGDISH KATURIYA

2007 0 Supreme(All) 1744 • India - Allahabad

M.K.MITTAL

In the case of Samrat Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. ... Dolly George, 2003 SCC (Cri) 1224, it was observed by the Hon’ble Apex Court that the dismissal of the complaint at the threshold by the learned Magistrate on the ground that the individual through whom the complaint was filed, failed to produce the certified copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors

Filter by Legal Phrase

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

Approbate and Reprobate: Key Legal Doctrine Explained Vague Threatening Phone Calls: Why They Fail in Court Does SCC Own Copyright on Full Text Judgments? G.O. Ms No. 108: TN Salesman & Packer Recruitment Rules Article 226 vs 227: Key Differences in High Court Powers Judgments on One-Time GNA Charges in India TIP: Judicial vs Executive Magistrate Rules Explained Can a Sole Dissenting Member Block Society Redevelopment? How to Sue Fake Facebook Accounts for Defamation in India Illustrations: Person Dominating Will in Indian Law Perusal in Court Orders: What It Means in Law Litigant Vigilance: Essential Duty in Court Proceedings What to Do If Company Suit Signatory Dies Renting House Without Rent Agreement in India: Risks Stay on Money Realization After Ejectment: Is It Possible?