The decision emphasizes that the legal framework permits concurrent proceedings and penalties under different statutes for related offences, provided procedural requirements are met Sachin VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay, Jaganath Enterprises VS State of A. P. - Andhra Pradesh.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan, emphasizing that the acquittal order was by a competent court and that the subsequent criminal proceeding ... Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan (supra), wherein it has been categorically held that the Food Safety Officer can also lodge complaint for offences punishable under the IPC, in addition to offences under the FSS Act. ... Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan....
Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan, which held that non-compliance with the provisions of the FSS Act does not bar prosecution under the ... Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan [2018 (4) KLT OnLine 3044 (SC)] to substantiate his submission that the instant prosecution is maintainable. 7. ... The Supreme Court in Sayyed Subhan’s case (supra) interpreting Section 55 of the FSS Act that provides for a penalty to be imposed for non-compliance with the....
Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan and others). The facts show that the crime was registered under the provisions of Food Safety and Standard Act 2006 and also the provision of the IPC like Section 272 and 328. Following points were involved in the matter.
Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan, 2018 AIR (SC) 5348 by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and in Ganesh Pandurang Jadhao v. The State of Maharashtra, 2016 Cri. L.J. 2401 and Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia v. ... State of Kerala, 1995 (1) SCJ 277, Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan, M/s. Pepsico India Holdings (Pvt) Ltd., v. State of U.P., 2011 (2) Crimes 250, Sanjay Anjay Stores v. Union of India, 2017 SCC Online Cal 16323, Boop Singh Tyagi v. State, 2002 Crl.L.J. 2872, State....
Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan and Ors. reported in [MANU/SC/1021/2018]. 4. ... Sayyed Hasan and others] decided on 20.09.2018, the Apex Court has considered the various provisions of Special Enactment, the provisions of Indian Penal Code and also the provision of section 26 of General Clauses Act and the Apex Court has laid down that in aforesaid Special Enactment, there is no
public order apart from attracting a penalty under Section 55 of the FSS Act would, in view of the decision of the Apex Court in Sayyed ... Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan & Ors., (2018) AIR SC 5348 where the Apex Court after recording that there is no bar to a trial or conviction of offender under the two different enactment but limiting the bar to the punishment to be imposed on the offender, had remanded the matters to the High Court in respect ... On perusal of the decision of the Apex Court in the case....
Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan and others, 2018 (3) ALT(Crl.) 365 (SC) : AIR 2018 SCC 5348, which also deals with the FSS Act and offences under the IPC for the transportation and sale of Gutkha, Pan Masala etc. ... Subhan, learned counsel, continues the arguments on the same lines. Public Prosecutors submissions: 8. Learned Public Prosecutor for the State appeared personally and argued on behalf of the respondents. ... Subhan, learned counsels for the petitioners. The learned Public Pros....
Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan and Others, the issue that had arisen for consideration was whether an accused could be prosecuted for an offence punishable under the Penal Code for which a proceeding can also be drawn under the provisions of the Food Safety and Standards Act.
Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan and Ors., (2018) AIR SC 5348 Hon'ble the Supreme has considered the issue and held that: 7.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.