AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Supreme Court Decisions on Procedural Fairness and Natural Justice - The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and procedural fairness in administrative and judicial proceedings. Cases like Poonam v. State of U.P. (2016) SCC 779 highlight the need for fair hearing and proper notice, reaffirming that violations of natural justice principles can vitiate proceedings Adarsh Singh VS State of U. P. - Allahabad.

  • Interpretation of Legal Principles and Jurisdiction - The Court has clarified the scope of judicial review and the power of High Courts and the Supreme Court to mold relief based on settled legal positions. In Dinesh Singh Chauhan (2016) SCC 749, it was held that courts can exercise their discretion to modify relief within legal bounds, but cannot overstep their jurisdiction or invalidate regulations without proper scrutiny STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS DADU DAYAL MARRIAGE GARDEN - Rajasthan.

  • Reliance on Past Supreme Court Cases for Consistency - Several cases cite earlier judgments to ensure consistency in legal interpretation. For example, the decision in Commissioner, Central Excise and Customs, Kerala (referenced in Piyare Lal Hari Singh Builders Pvt. Ltd. VS Union of India - Delhi) reinforces the need to follow Supreme Court rulings when adjudicating show cause notices or related issues.

  • Specific Case Summaries:

  • SCC 105 of 2016 - The case involved issues related to procedural irregularities and the necessity to follow Supreme Court directives for fair adjudication. The Court reaffirmed the importance of law laid down in previous cases like Willie Slaney (affirmed in Anant Prakash Sinha, 2016 SCC 105) regarding the impact of irregularities on judgments Ramvishwas Patel @ Balua VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh.
  • SCC 126 and other references (Union of India VS Hardy Exploration and Production (India) INC - Supreme Court) discuss appeals and judgments related to administrative and constitutional law, emphasizing the role of courts in ensuring justice and lawful procedures.
  • Cases like Bank of India (2016 SCC 762) highlight the legal requirements for valid leases under Section 105 of the Transfer of Property Act (TP Act), including the necessity of registration to enforce rights over premises State Bank of India VS Rajesh Khetan, Son of Shri Gopal Khetan - Patna.

  • Conclusion - The Supreme Court in 2016 reaffirmed the primacy of natural justice, consistent application of legal principles, and the importance of following precedents to maintain judicial integrity. It also clarified procedural aspects in various contexts, ensuring justice is administered fairly and lawfully Adarsh Singh VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS DADU DAYAL MARRIAGE GARDEN - Rajasthan, Piyare Lal Hari Singh Builders Pvt. Ltd. VS Union of India - Delhi.

References: - Commissioner, Central Excise and Customs, Kerala v. (2016) SCC 105 - Poonam v. State of U.P. (2016) SCC 779 - Willie Slaney & Anant Prakash Sinha (2016) SCC 105 - Bank of India v. (2016) SCC 762

Search Results for "Scc 105 2016 Supreme Court Case 105 of 2016"

Piyare Lal Hari Singh Builders Pvt.  Ltd.  VS Union of India

2023 0 Supreme(Del) 4681 India - Delhi

VIBHU BAKHRU, AMIT MAHAJAN

The court relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in Commissioner, Central Excise and Customs, Kerala v. ... adjudicate the show cause notices afresh in light of the law laid down by the Supreme Court. ... Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in Commissioner, Central Excise and Customs, Kerala ... The Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner, Central Excise ....

Union of India VS Hardy Exploration and Production (India) INC

2018 5 Supreme 101 India - Supreme Court

R.K.AGRAWAL, A.M.SAPRE

(2016) 4 SCC 126; (2016) 11 SCC 508; (2017) 5 SCC 331; (1999) 2 SCC 479; (2002) 4 SCC 105; (2008) 4 SCC 190; 2) This appeal arises from the final judgment and order dated 27.07.2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in FAO No.59 of 2016 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Union of India (appellant ... Kaise....

Ramvishwas Patel @ Balua VS State of M. P.

2017 0 Supreme(MP) 805 India - Madhya Pradesh

R.S.JHA, NANDITA DUBEY

(2016)6 SCC 105 referred to. ... 464 and 465 of the CrPC even if, there is irregularity in framing of charge, the same would not render the judgment of the trial Court ... The law laid down in the case of Willie Slaney (supra), has again been affirmed and relied upon by the Supreme Court in the case Anant Prakash Sinha v. State of Haryana and another [(2016)6 SCC 105]. ... 24. ... The aforesaid la....

Narendra Patel VS State of M. P.

2019 0 Supreme(MP) 294 India - Madhya Pradesh

G.S.AHLUWALIA

, (2016) 11 SCC 147, (2010) 4 SCC 301, (2016) 2 SCC ... (2010) 8 SCC 24, (1986) 2 SCC 237, (2002) 4 SCC 105 ... , (2015) 10 SCC 161, (2016) 4 SCC 785, (2017) 3 SCC 467 ... The Supreme Court in the case of Bhatia International v. Bulk Trading S.A., reported in (2002) 4 SCC 105#HL_EN....

Adarsh Singh VS State of U. P.

2019 0 Supreme(All) 1719 India - Allahabad

AJAY BHANOT

105, Poonam Vs State of U.P. and Ors. (2016) 2 SCC 779, Alagaapuram R. ... Vs Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly and Ors. (2016) 6 SCC 82] - The court discussed the violation of principles of natural justice ... The court emphasized the need for procedural fairness and the application of natural justice principles, citing various case laws ... Yet again in the case of Poonam Vs State of U.P. and Ors. (2016) 2 #HL_STAR....

STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS DADU DAYAL MARRIAGE GARDEN

2018 0 Supreme(Raj) 531 India - Rajasthan

K.S.JHAVERI, VIJAY KUMAR VYAS

Dinesh Singh Chauhan, (2016) 9 SCC 749, which held that the High Court could mould the relief on the basis of the settled legal position ... Mali & Ors., (2002) 10 SCC 117, which held that the High Court could not have gone into the validity of regulations which were part ... Fact of the Case: The appellants, the State Government, challenged the judgment of the Single Judge quashing notices ... Taking into consideration the basic principle as pronounced by the Supreme#HL_EN....

State Bank of India VS Rajesh Khetan, Son of Shri Gopal Khetan

2017 0 Supreme(Pat) 52 India - Patna

HEMANT GUPTA, SUDHIR SINGH

Bank of India and others, (2016) 3 SCC 762 and Harshad Govardhan Sondagar v. ... The court emphasized the requirement of a valid lease under Section 105 of the TP Act and the implications of unregistered lease ... Fact of the Case: The case involved a dispute over the possession of premises between a bank and a purported tenant ... In the case reported as Anthony v. K.C. Ittoop & Sons, (2000) 6 SCC 394 the Supreme Court#....

Mahavir VS Union of India

2018 6 Supreme 140 India - Supreme Court

ARUN MISHRA, MOHAN M.SHANTANAGOUDAR

11 SCC 412 – Relied upon ... (2016) 16 SCC ... A writ petition was filed by the petitioners before the High Court after 105 years later, urging that compensation has not been paid ... (Para 20, 22, 23, 25) ... Facts of the case: ...   ... In case delay was due to petitions filed by the claimants in the High Court and Supreme Court and the compensation has been deposited thereafter, payment of interest at the ....

Union of India VS Hardy Exploration and Production (India) INC

2018 0 Supreme(SC) 917 India - Supreme Court

DIPAK MISRA, A. M. KHANWILKAR, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD

(Para 17, 23) ... (2002) 4 SCC 105; ; (2008) 10 SCC 308; (2016) 11 SCC 508; Facts of the case: ... & ... to exercise our power under Order VI Rule 2 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and refer this case (appeal ) to be dealt with by the larger Bench of this Court for its hearing.” ... Bulk Trading S.A. and Another, (2002) 4 SCC 105 Venture Global Engineering v. Satyam Computer Ser....

South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd.  VS Bhagalpur Electricity Distribution Company Pvt.  Ltd.

2023 0 Supreme(Pat) 352 India - Patna

P. B. BAJANTHRI, ARUN KUMAR JHA

Request case No. 06/2016 filed on behalf of BEDCPL for appointment of Arbitrator on behalf of SBPDCL, there ought not to be any ... SCC Online P & H 105 (Para 1, 8, 9, 10 & 14), (2020) 15 SCC 706 (Para 12, 13, 22, 25), (2016) 10 SCC 813, (2020) 12 SCC 767, (2013) 1SCC 641, Misc. ... High Court or Supreme Court, as the case may be. 36. ... Then the Hon’ble Supreme#HL_END....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top