Seizure Not Prepared - Multiple sources highlight that failure to prepare a seizure list or memo at the scene of recovery renders the seizure proceedings illegal and casts doubt on the prosecution's case. For instance, in Hanamantu s/o Gangaram Badawat VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay, the absence of a seizure inventory or certificate makes the conviction unsustainable. Similarly, AKHTAAT HUSSAIN Vs. UNION OF INDIA - Rajasthan emphasizes that not preparing a seizure memo at the site undermines the legality of the seizure. Kuka Ram S/o Bhagwan Lal VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan and State of Bihar VS Mithilesh Tiwary, Son of Sahdeo Tiwary - Patna also note that seizure memos not prepared at the place of recovery weaken the case and raise reasonable doubts about the seizure's legality.
Violation of Procedural Requirements - Several cases point out violations of statutory procedures, such as not involving independent witnesses, not recording seizure details in the case diary, or not conducting proper panchnama procedures. For example, SANJAY KUMAR YADAV Vs The State - Patna found seizure vitiated due to non-compliance with Section 100 CrPC, and Akhlaque Ahmad VS Intelligence Officer N. C. and another - Bombay notes the absence of a panchnama and inconsistent witness testimony.
Impact on Prosecution and Court Findings - Courts have often held that the absence of seizure memos or improper seizure procedures lead to doubts about the evidence's credibility. In NAGESH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan, procedural flaws in seizure and delays influenced the court's decision to consider bail, recognizing the importance of proper seizure procedures.
Overall Conclusion - The consistent theme across the sources is that seizure proceedings that lack proper documentation, such as seizure memos or inventories prepared at the scene, are illegal and significantly weaken the prosecution's case. Proper adherence to legal procedures is crucial for the validity of seizure evidence, and failure to do so can lead to acquittals or the setting aside of convictions.
and certification of seizure - Neither prepared nor produced before Court - Conviction illegal - Not sustainable - Accused entitled ... not prepared or produced before Court - Hence, conviction is illegal. ... 1985 - Section 52-A - Non-production of seized article, entirely before Court - Samples of the same produced only - Inventory of seizure ... In the instant case admittedly no inventory was prepared and if prepared the same is not#HL_E....
Finding of the Court: The court found that the seizure list was not prepared in accordance with Section 100 CrPC, as ... The petitioner claimed innocence and argued that the seizure list was not prepared in the presence of independent witnesses, violating ... This rendered the seizure vitiated. Issues: Whether the seizure list was prepared in accordance with Section 100 CrPC. ... No.41733 of 2021(2) dt.04-01-2022 3/3 available ....
The oral evidence was contradictory and the seizure list was not prepared. ... The oral evidence was contradictory and the seizure list was not prepared. ... The respondent was not given a reasonable opportunity to defend himself. ... No seizure list was prepared nor was the respondent asked to sign on the envelope. The respondent was immediately removed from the Beliaghata P. ... It was not. In the absence of the ....
No.30/2023 - Co-accused previously granted bail - Seizure memo not prepared at the site of recovery, raising doubts on the prosecution's ... ... ... Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the failure to prepare a seizure memo at the site of recovery casts doubt on the prosecution's ... ... ... Findings of Court: ... The court found merit in the arguments regarding the illegality of the seizure proceedings and the ... Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances ....
witness, who could prove the seizure not examined-No panchnama prepared-No panch examined-Prosecution contention. panchnama was ... not essential-Held, witness not giving consistent version of seizure and search-Prosecution failed to prove the case. ... ... Sections 8(c), 21 and 29-seizure of Narcotics-Place of raid unproved-Independent ... He has also stated that no panchnama of search and seizure in respect of room No. 302 of Poornima Guest House ....
Finding of the Court: The court found that the seizure list was not prepared at the place of occurrence as claimed ... Seizure List - Criminal Procedure - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 378(1) and (3); Indian Penal Code, Sections 489- ... Issues: Validity of the seizure list, sufficiency of evidence to prove the charges, and the standard for appellate interference ... Learned trial Court, therefore, recorded a finding that the seizure list was apparently not#HL_....
memo was not prepared at the site of recovery. ... The failure to prepare a seizure memo at the site of recovery raised reasonable doubt about the legality of the seizure, influencing ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the seizure was not conducted in accordance ... Admittedly, the seizure officer did not prepare the seizure memo at the spot. ... In the present case, two different mem....
prepared any seizure list regarding blood soaked soil and not at all mentioned in the case diary as to whether he noticed any blood ... body brought to the police station but in the evidence of investigation officer it has come that inquest report on the dead body prepared ... and sentence – Investigation officer stated that after getting information on mobile phone reached to the place of occurrence but not ... The investigating officer, who stated that after getting information on mobile phone, reache....
... ... Findings of Court: ... Seizure memo not prepared at the scene raises doubts about the prosecution's case; significant delay ... ... ... Issues: Whether the procedural flaws in seizure and delay in trial justify bail. ... Initial bail application dismissed; second application filed citing procedural flaws in seizure and delay in trial. ... court, this Court prima facie finds sufficient merit in the arguments of learned counsel for the petitioners that since the seizure memo ....
(PW5-5) stated in his cross-examination that he had not prepared seizure list of the blood stain at the place of occurrence – objective ... evidence of the case not been brought on record by the prosecution – prosecution utterly and miserably failed to substantiate the ... (PW-5) has stated in Para-10 of his cross-examination that he had not prepared seizure list of the blood stain at the place of occurrence. Thus objective evidence of the case has also not#....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.