AI Overview...
- Sejalben Tejasbhai Chovatiya - Main points and insights:
- She has been involved in multiple legal cases, notably against the State of Gujarat, including case No.7666 of 2016, which was disposed of by the Gujarat High Court on 20th October 2016. In these cases, her name appears in the context of criminal proceedings and petitions for quashing charges Kalpesh Badresh Mehta VS State Of Gujarat - Gujarat, Archana Amit Shah VS Amit Hasmukhbhai Shah - Gujarat, Pardeep Sharma & others vs Deepika Gautam - Himachal Pradesh, SONIA TRIPATHY vs STATE OF ODISHA - Orissa, ARCHANA AMIT SHAH vs AMIT HASMUKHBHAI SHAH - Gujarat.
- The courts have considered her cases in light of legal principles such as the necessity of judicial expediency and the criteria for initiating proceedings, referencing judgments like Padmaja Sharma vs. Ratan Lal Sharma and Moti Lal Songara vs. Prem Prakash Archana Amit Shah VS Amit Hasmukhbhai Shah - Gujarat, Sejalben Tejasbhai Chovatiya VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat.
- The Gujarat High Court in her case emphasized that proceedings should only be initiated if deemed expedient in the interest of justice, aligning with the principles laid down in other Supreme Court rulings Pardeep Sharma & others vs Deepika Gautam - Himachal Pradesh.
-
Her cases have been cited in discussions about the scope of criminal proceedings and the conditions under which they are quashed or continued, reflecting her involvement in significant legal proceedings concerning criminal law and procedural justice Kalpesh Badresh Mehta VS State Of Gujarat - Gujarat, VASANTBHAI BHALABHAI PATEL Vs STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat.
-
Analysis and conclusion:
- Sejalben Tejasbhai Chovatiya's legal history indicates her active involvement in criminal proceedings, with courts scrutinizing the necessity and expediency of initiating or quashing cases.
- The courts consistently rely on established jurisprudence, including Supreme Court decisions, to determine the appropriateness of proceeding with criminal cases.
- Her cases exemplify the judicial approach to balancing the interests of justice with procedural expediency, highlighting the importance of legal standards in criminal proceedings Sejalben Tejasbhai Chovatiya VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat, Pardeep Sharma & others vs Deepika Gautam - Himachal Pradesh, 2016 SCC Online Guj 6333.
References: - Sejalben Tejasbhai Chovatiya VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat, Archana Amit Shah VS Amit Hasmukhbhai Shah - Gujarat, Kalpesh Badresh Mehta VS State Of Gujarat - Gujarat, Dhrutiben Dhananjaybhai Chorada VS Dhananjaybhai Raydevbhai Chorada - Gujarat, Pardeep Sharma & others vs Deepika Gautam - Himachal Pradesh, SACHIN KUMAR DAKSH vs MAMTA GOLA - Delhi, VASANTBHAI BHALABHAI PATEL Vs STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat, ARCHANA AMIT SHAH vs AMIT HASMUKHBHAI SHAH - Gujarat, SONIA TRIPATHY vs STATE OF ODISHA - Orissa.
Search Results for "Sejalben Tejasbhai Chovatiya"
2015 0 Supreme(Guj) 2205 • India - Gujarat
SONIA GOKANI
2018 0 Supreme(Guj) 951 • India - Gujarat
PARESH UPADHYAY
... (ii) Sejalben Tejasbhai Chovatiya Vs. State of Gujarat, (2017) 3 RCR(Criminal) 477. ... (iii) Padmaja Sharma Vs. Ratan Lal Sharma, (2000) AIR SC 1398. ... (iv) Moti Lal Songara Vs. Prem Prakash and Ors., (2013) AIR SC 2078.
2019 0 Supreme(Guj) 232 • India - Gujarat
A.P.THAKER
... (iii) Sejalben Tejasbhai Chovatiya v. State of Gujarat, Special Criminal Application No.7666 of 2016 decided on 20.10.2016 by this High Court. ... 5.
2018 0 Supreme(Guj) 400 • India - Gujarat
S.G.SHAH
... 11.1 Respondent husband has also relied upon unreported order dated 20.10.2016 in Special Criminal Application (Quashing) No.7666 of 2016 between Sejalben Tejasbhai Chovatiya vs.
2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 5737 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Rakesh Kainthla, J
He relied upon the following judgments in support of his submission: Sejalben Tejasbhai Chovatiya vs State of Gujrat R/SC.RA/7666/2016 Smt. Ritu @ Ridhima and another vs. ... In Sejalbend Tejasbhai Chovatiya (supra), it was held that a proceeding can be initiated only if the Court is satisfied that it is expedient in the interest of justice to do so.
2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 3248 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA, RENU BHATNAGAR, JJ
Rajesh Jaiswal , 2000 SCC OnLine MP 580; Sejalben Tejasbhai Chovatiya v. State of Gujarat 2016 SCC OnLine Guj 6333. 6.
• India - High Court of Gujarat
This Court also in case of Sejalben Tejasbhai Chovatiya vs.
• India - Gujarat
(ii) Sejalben
2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 5516 • India - Orissa High Court
No.19 of 2004 dated 18th November, 2010; Sejalben Tejasbhai Chovatiya Vrs. State of Gujrat of Gujarat HC in Special Criminal Application (Quashing) No.7666 of 2016 disposed of on 20th October, 2016:2016 SCC Online Guj 6333; Union of India and others Vrs.
2019 0 Supreme(Guj) 209 • India - Gujarat
SONIA GOKANI
This Court in case of Sejalben Tejashbai Chovatia vs. State of Gujarat reported in, (2017) 3 RCR(Criminal) 477 also has followed the decision in case of Iqbal Singh Marwah (supra) and observed as under: ... “15. The Apex Court in the case of Pritish vs.
Filter by Legal Phrase
