AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • SLP No. 12787 of 2025 - Main points and insights:
  • The case involves Suguna & Another, decided on 08.09.2025, with the Supreme Court addressing review jurisdiction in this matter Smt. Snigdha Gwal vs State Of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh, Selvarani vs Muthulakshmi - Madras.
  • The petitioner sought review or recall of the order dated 22.08.2025 passed in W.A. No. 426/2025, which was under scrutiny for correctness and jurisdiction Smt. Snigdha Gwal vs State Of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh.
  • The respondents relied on the Supreme Court's recent judgment in SLP No. (C) 12787 of 2025 (Suguna & Anr.) to counter the petitioner's arguments, emphasizing the Court's stance on review powers Kehar Singh & Ors. vs State of H.P. & Ors. - Himachal Pradesh, Selvarani vs Muthulakshmi - Madras.
  • The judgment discussed the scope of review under Article 136 of the Constitution and clarified that review is permissible only in cases of apparent error or miscarriage of justice, not as a matter of routine Selvarani vs Muthulakshmi - Madras.
  • The Court reaffirmed its position that appellate and review jurisdiction must be exercised with caution to prevent abuse and ensure finality Selvarani vs Muthulakshmi - Madras.

  • Analysis and Conclusion:

  • The Supreme Court in Suguna & Anr. (2025) underscored the limited scope of review, emphasizing that it cannot be used to reappreciate evidence or correct mere errors of law.
  • The Court dismissed the review petition, reaffirming the finality of its previous orders and the importance of judicial discipline.
  • This case reinforces the principle that review petitions are to be granted only in exceptional circumstances, aligning with established jurisprudence on review powers Selvarani vs Muthulakshmi - Madras.

References: - Suguna & Anr., 2025 INSC 1080, SLP (C) No. 12787/2025, decided on 08.09.2025. - Supreme Court judgment on review jurisdiction in SLP No. (C) 12787 of 2025. - Court's clarification on the limited scope of review under Article 136 of the Constitution.

Search Results for "Slp C no 12787 of 2025"

Smt. Snigdha Gwal vs State Of Chhattisgarh

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 10456 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Bibhu Datta Guru, J

Suguna & Another, 2025 INSC 1080, SLP (C) No. 12787/2025 decided on 08.09.2025, reiterated the aforesaid view. ... By this present review petition, the petitioner is seeking review/recall of order dated 22.08.2025 passed by this Court in W.A. No. 426/2025. 2. The review petitioner in person seeks review of the order dated 22.08.2025 passed in W.A. ... Bare perusal of the order under review, it is manifest that the writ appeal preferred on behalf of ....

Kehar Singh & Ors. vs State of H.P. & Ors.

2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 7421 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Vivek Singh Thakur, J

Learned counsel for the respondents has placed reliance on the recent judgment of the Apex Court in SLP No. ( C) 12787 of 2025, titled as Malleeswari vs. K. ... Suguna & Anr., decided on 08.09.2025, to repel the contention of the petitioners by referring paras 15 and 17, which read as under:- “15.

Malleeswari VS K.  Suguna

2025 7 Supreme 311 India - Supreme Court

AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, S. V. N. BHATTI

M. D. CHOKSEY CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD. vs BABUBHAI MOHANLAL CHOKSEY (DELETED SINCE DECEASED)

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 247161 India - High Court of Bombay

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Saguna & Anr, SLP (C) No. 12787/2025., Full Bench judgments of this Court in the cases of Hemendra Rasiklal Ghia Vs. Subodh Mody, 2008 (6) Mh.L.J. 886, and Bhartiben Shah & Ors. Vs. Gracy Thomas & Ors. ... No. 226/2025 whereby the said application preferred by the petitioners/original defendants for review of the first order dated 11th November, 2025, came to be WRIT PETITION NO. 15661 OF 2025 M. ... This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assails an order dated 11....

Selvarani vs Muthulakshmi

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 59304 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

K.Suguna and another in SLP (C) No.12787 of 2025, reported in MANU/SC/1240/2025, dated 08.09.2025 has dealt with the review jurisdiction and it is necessary to refer the following passages: “15. ... BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON: 17.09.2025 PRONOUNCED ON:26.09.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR REV.APLC(MD)No.110 of 2025 in S.A. ... 26.09.2025 Index : Yes : No Internet : Yes : No SSL....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top