AI Overview...

Sopan Sukhadeo Sable - Main Points and Insights:
The case of Sopan Sukhadeo Sable (2004) SCC 137 is frequently cited in legal jurisprudence, especially concerning property rights, possession, and injunctions. The Supreme Court clarified legal principles regarding settled possession and trespass, emphasizing that a trespasser cannot seek injunction against the true owner (References: Shammi Nagpal VS Sudhir Nagpal - Bombay, Joaquim D'Souza, (Deceased) VS Ecotech Projects Pvt. Ltd. - Bombay, R. Madesh & Another VS A. M. Rathinam & Another - Madras, S. S. Ansari VS Ansal Properties and Inds. Ltd. - Punjab and Haryana, Deity (The God-Shiva) Represented by Smt. Kamala Nath (Shebait) VS Abani Mohan Nath - Tripura).
The judgment elaborates on the importance of pleadings, stating that pleadings should only contain material facts, not evidence, aligning with the principles laid down in the case (Reference: B.Bhujanga Narsimha Rao, vs S.Rama Krishna Reddy, - Telangana).
The decision also discusses procedural aspects, such as valuation and stamp duty, emphasizing that courts should allow exceptions to prevent grave injustice, as highlighted in the context of Civil Procedure Code interpretations (References: LALJEE JOSHI VS BHAIYYA RAM YADAV - Chhattisgarh, Kisanlal VS Harischandra - Bombay).
The case is cited in relation to the law of injunctions, property rights, and procedural correctness in civil litigation, reinforcing the principle that legal remedies must align with established law and facts.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The Sopan Sukhadeo Sable case is a landmark judgment that clarifies key legal principles related to possession, ownership, and procedural correctness in civil law. Its repeated citations underscore its significance in Indian jurisprudence concerning property disputes, injunctions, and pleadings. The judgment emphasizes that legal remedies should be granted based on settled facts and legal rights, and procedural rules must be adhered to carefully to prevent miscarriage of justice.
Overall, the case serves as a guiding precedent for courts in handling property disputes, emphasizing the importance of factual clarity, procedural correctness, and the legal limits of remedies like injunctions.

References: - Shammi Nagpal VS Sudhir Nagpal - Bombay, Joaquim D'Souza, (Deceased) VS Ecotech Projects Pvt. Ltd. - Bombay, RAVINDER VS VIRENDER SINGH - Delhi, R. Madesh & Another VS A. M. Rathinam & Another - Madras, S. S. Ansari VS Ansal Properties and Inds. Ltd. - Punjab and Haryana, B.Bhujanga Narsimha Rao, vs S.Rama Krishna Reddy, - Telangana, Deity (The God-Shiva) Represented by Smt. Kamala Nath (Shebait) VS Abani Mohan Nath - Tripura, Kisanlal VS Harischandra - Bombay, LALJEE JOSHI VS BHAIYYA RAM YADAV - Chhattisgarh, MONA BAI SAHU VS SANJIV KUMAR JAIN - Madras

Search Results for "Sopan Sukhadeo Sable"

2008 0 Supreme(Bom) 682 • India - Bombay

D.B.BHOSALE

The decision in the case of Krishna Ram Mahale is expressly referred to and dealt with in the case of Sopan Sukhdeo Sable. ... Vs. r Voltas Ltd and ors.)I4, Company Cases Vol. 84 page 28; and (vi) (Sopan Sukhadeo Sable 1 and ors. Vs. Assistant Charity Commissioner and ors.)15, 2004(4) Bom.C.R. (S.C.) 904 : 1: 2004 DGLS(soft) 42 : 2004(3) S.C.C. 137: t A.I.R. 2004 S.C. 1801. ... ... 18.2 The Supreme Court in Sable Sopan Sukhadeo Sab....

Joaquim D'Souza, (Deceased) VS Ecotech Projects Pvt. Ltd.

2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 1457 • India - Bombay

PRITHVIRAJ K.CHAVAN

The judgment also referred to the case law of Sopan Sukhdeo Sable Vs. ... The judgment also referred to the case law of Sopan Sukhdeo Sable Vs. ... The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sopan Sukhdeo Sable Vs. Assistant Charity Commissioner, 2004 STPL 2280 SC has again clarified the aspect of settled possession. Paragraphs 24 and 25 of the judgment read thus: ... “24. ... Ltd and 2004(STPL) 2280 Sopan ....

2007 0 Supreme(Del) 582 • India - Delhi

J.M.MALIK

The court also referred to legal principles from Sopan Sukhdeo Sable and Others v. ... ... ( 7 ) IN Sopan Sukhdeo Sable and Others v. Assistant Charity Commissioner and others [air 2004 SC 1801], it was held that : ... "24.

R. Madesh & Another VS A. M. Rathinam & Another

2008 0 Supreme(Mad) 127 • India - Madras

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, M.VENUGOPAL

. - Sopan Sukhdeo Sable & Ors. - Vs – Assistant Charity Commissioner & Ors. - Order XXXIX Rule 1 - Fact of the Case: The plaintiff ... -Vs – Rajiv Kumar Gupta & Ors. reported in 2008 (1) MLJ 45 (SC) and Full Bench decision of this Court in Nallathambi Nadar Chellakanu Nadar – Vs – Ammal Nadachi Chellathankom Nadachi & Ors. reported in 1964 MLJ 181 The decision of the Supreme Court in Sopan Sukhdeo Sable & Ors

S. S. Ansari VS Ansal Properties and Inds. Ltd.

2006 0 Supreme(P&H) 3424 • India - Punjab and Haryana

S.N.AGGARWAL

Shipping Corporation of India Limited - Sopan Sukhdeo Sable and others v. Assistant Charity Commissioner - Amrit Lal Chum v. ... It was further submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent-company that the Honble Supreme Court has held in numerous judgments that a trespasser cannot seek injunction against the true owner and reliance was placed on the judgment of the Honble Supreme Court reported as Sopan Sukhdeo Sable and

B.Bhujanga Narsimha Rao, vs S.Rama Krishna Reddy,

• India - High Court for the State of Telangana

Sukhadeo Sable and others Vs. ... If the contention of the appellant is accepted, it is nothing but hair-splitting of pleadings, reading each and out of the context in isolation giving go bye to the normal rule of pleadings as held by the Apex Court in Sopan Sukhadeo5. ... pleadings that every pleading shall contain, and contain only, a statement in a concise form of the material facts on which the party pleading relies on for his claim or defence, as the case may be, but not the evidence by which they are to be proved,....

Deity (The God-Shiva) Represented by Smt. Kamala Nath (Shebait) VS Abani Mohan Nath

2014 0 Supreme(Tri) 30 • India - Tripura

U.B.SAHA

Bhagjogna Kuer, AIR 1937 PC 69(76) - Sopan Sukhdeo Sable & Ors. V. ... In support of his aforesaid contention, he has placed reliance in the case of Sopan Sukhdeo Sable & Ors. V. Assistant Charity Commissioner & Ors., (2004) 3 SCC 137. ... 11. ... In Sopan Sukhdeo Sable (supra) the Apex Court taking note of its earlier judgment in Mahadeo Savlaram Shelke V. Pune Municipal Corpn., (1995) 3 SCC 33 held that no injunction could be gran....

2014 0 Supreme(Bom) 1062 • India - Bombay

T.V.NALAWADE

Bipin Vadilal Mehta); and, (4) AIR 2004 SC 1801 (Sopan Sukhdeo Sable v. Assistant Charity Commissioner). ... ... 5) Learned counsel for the applicants placed reliance on the case reported as (2004) 3 SCC 137 (Sopan Sukhdeo Sable v. Assistant Charity Commissioner).

2007 0 Supreme(Chh) 466 • India - Chhattisgarh

DILIP RAOSAHEB DESHMUKH

Sukhdeo Sable and others v. ... - The court discussed the provisions of O. 7, R. 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure and its interpretation by the Apex Court in Sopan ... Sukhdeo Sable and others v. ... exceptional nature for correcting the valuation or supplying the requisite stamp-paper as the case may be, within the time fixed by the court and that refusal to extend such time would cause grave injustice to the plaintiff. " ... ( 15 ) IN Sopan

2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 2079 • India - Madras

NANDITA DUBEY

Agencies (1989) 2 SCC 163, Sopan Sukhdeo Sable v. Assistant Charity Commissioner (2004) 3 SCC 137, Kamla and others Vs. K.T. ... Agencies (1989) 2 SCC 163, Sopan Sukhdeo Sable v. Assistant Charity Commissioner (2004) 3 SCC 137 and held: "12.

Filter by Legal Phrase

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

Approbate and Reprobate: Key Legal Doctrine Explained Vague Threatening Phone Calls: Why They Fail in Court Does SCC Own Copyright on Full Text Judgments? G.O. Ms No. 108: TN Salesman & Packer Recruitment Rules Article 226 vs 227: Key Differences in High Court Powers Judgments on One-Time GNA Charges in India TIP: Judicial vs Executive Magistrate Rules Explained Can a Sole Dissenting Member Block Society Redevelopment? How to Sue Fake Facebook Accounts for Defamation in India Illustrations: Person Dominating Will in Indian Law Perusal in Court Orders: What It Means in Law Litigant Vigilance: Essential Duty in Court Proceedings What to Do If Company Suit Signatory Dies Renting House Without Rent Agreement in India: Risks Stay on Money Realization After Ejectment: Is It Possible?