AI Overview...
-
Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad - A social welfare organization committed to preventing atrocities against women. It has actively participated in legal cases, notably filing appeals and assisting in judicial proceedings related to crimes against women. The organization’s role has been recognized as valuable by courts, including the Supreme Court of India. Rameshwar VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad: State Of Maharashtra VS Dilip Nathumal Chordia: Dilip Nathumal - Supreme Court, Bulu @ Bishnu Prasad Prusty @ Bisnu Prasad Prusty VS State of Orissa - Orissa
-
Legal Recognition and Role - The Supreme Court has acknowledged the contributions of Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad in various cases, emphasizing its service in social welfare and advocacy against female atrocities. Courts have referred to its involvement in criminal appeals and noted its efforts in aiding justice. Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad: State Of Maharashtra VS Dilip Nathumal Chordia: Dilip Nathumal - Supreme Court, Rameshwar VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, Bulu @ Bishnu Prasad Prusty @ Bisnu Prasad Prusty VS State of Orissa - Orissa
-
Case Law and Judicial Principles - The organization was involved in significant cases such as Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad v. Dilip Nathumal Chordia (1989 SCC 715), where the Court cautioned High Courts against undue interference during charge framing, emphasizing careful judicial discretion. The Supreme Court also reiterated that decisions in this case do not establish conflicting principles but reinforce procedural guidelines. Rameshwar VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, Shatrudhan Tiwari VS State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor - Rajasthan, Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad etc. VS Dilip Nathumal Chordia - Crimes, Shrivina @ Deepa Kamat VS State Of Goa - Bombay, State VS Rajesh Kumar - Punjab and Haryana, Jagmohan Batham VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh
-
Main Points and Insights:
- The organization acts as a social watchdog and advocate against violence toward women.
- Courts have recognized its proactive role in criminal justice, especially in cases concerning atrocities on women.
- The Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad case is frequently cited in judicial decisions to clarify procedural law, including the scope of judicial inquiry and charge framing.
- The Supreme Court has emphasized judicial restraint at early stages of criminal proceedings, as seen in its directives and observations in these cases. Rameshwar VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, Shatrudhan Tiwari VS State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor - Rajasthan, Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad etc. VS Dilip Nathumal Chordia - Crimes, Shrivina @ Deepa Kamat VS State Of Goa - Bombay
Analysis and Conclusion: Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad has played a significant role as a social organization dedicated to combating violence against women. Its involvement in key legal cases has contributed to judicial understanding of procedural safeguards and the importance of social welfare in the justice system. The courts have acknowledged its service, and its case law references serve as important precedents in the legal landscape concerning women’s rights and judicial procedures.
Search Results for "Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad"
2015 0 Supreme(All) 3520 • India - Allahabad
RANJANA PANDYA
State of West Bengal [ 2000 (1) SCC 722 ] - Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad vs. ... This Court in Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad vs. Dilip Nathumal Chordia & Anr. [ 1989 (1) SCC 715 ] cautioned the High Courts to be loathe in interfering at the stage of framing the charges against the accused.
2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 2906 • India - Rajasthan
NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
State of Maharashtra, (2002) 2 SCC 135; Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad v. ... In Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad v. Dilip Nathumal Chordia, (1989) 1 SCC 715, Hon’ble Supreme Court reiterated as hereinunder:- "14. These two decisions do not lay down different principles.
• India - Crimes
B.C.RAY, K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY
Virodhi Parishad’, a social welfare organisation appreciated. ... nbsp;Orders accordingly - Trial Court is directed to proceed with the trial - Useful service rendered by 'Stri Atyachar ... Criminal Appeals Nos. 486 and 487 of 1984 have been preferred by an Organisation called "Stree Atyachaar Virodhi Parishad" it is an association committed to prevent atrocities on women. Criminal Appeals Nos. 488 and 489 of 1984 are by the State of Maharashtra. ... Before parting wi....
2022 0 Supreme(Ori) 176 • India - Orissa
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
The court also referred to the decision of the apex court in the case of Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad v. ... Reference in this regard may be had to the decision of the apex court in the case of Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad v. Dilip Nathumal Chordia, reported in (1989) 1 SCC 715 as also the case of Union of India v.
1989 0 Supreme(SC) 81 • India - Supreme Court
B.C.RAY, K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY
Before parting with the case, we must place on record the useful service rendered by Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad in this case. It is a social welfare organisation. ... Criminal Appeal Nos. 486 and 487 of 1984 have been preferred by an organisation called "Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad". It is an association committed to prevent atrocities on women. Criminal Appeal Nos. 488 and 489 of 1984 are by the State of Maharashtra.
1995 0 Supreme(MP) 1177 • India - Madhya Pradesh
SHACHEENDRA DWIVEDI
It has been observed by their Lordships of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad v.
1990 0 Supreme(SC) 27 • India - Supreme Court
A.M.AHMADI, M.FATHIMA BEEVI
2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 1309 • India - Bombay
PRITHVIRAJ K.CHAVAN
Prafulla Kumar Samal, this Court has expounded the law in these words: (Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad case, SCCp.721, para 14) "14....In fact, Section 227, itself contains enough guidelines as to the scope of enquiry for the purpose of discharging an accused. ... Our attention has been drawn to Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad V. Dilip Nathumal Chordia as well as K. Narayana Rao but we are unable to appreciate any manner in which they would persuade....
1989 0 Supreme(P&H) 1006 • India - Punjab and Haryana
S.S.GREWAL
The counsel, appearing on behalf of the Chandigarh Administration referred to Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad v. Dilip Nathumal Chordia and another, 1989(1) Supreme Court Cases 715.
2003 1 Supreme 878 • India - Crimes
N.S.HEGDE, B.P.SINGH
(1979(4) SCC 274), Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad etc. v. Dilip Nathumal Chordia & Anr. (1989(1) SCC 715), Niranjan Singh Karam Singh Punjabi, Advocate etc. v. Jitendra Bhimraj Bijjayya & Ors. ... In Stree Atyachar Virodhi Parishad etc. v. Dilip Nathumal Chordia & Anr. (supra), a two-Judge Bench of this Court following the judgments in Prafulla Kumar’s case and Ramesh Singh’s case (supra) has held : “These two decisions do not lay down different pri....
Filter by Legal Phrase
