Suleman Bakery Incident Overview - The incident involved police firing at Suleman Bakery, resulting in multiple casualties and injuries. The police admitted to firing at inmates and persons on the bakery's rooftop, with the incident scrutinized for its legality and procedural conduct. The topography of the bakery and nearby mosque was considered crucial in understanding the incident's dynamics. The police's version was met with dissatisfaction from the Commission, which questioned the authenticity of their account. Ashfaque Ahmed VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay
Police Response and FIR Details - A police officer from Pydhonie Police Station reported the incident, noting shots fired from Suleman Bakery. An FIR was lodged at Dongri Police Station, and legal arguments suggested that a second FIR for the same incident was inadmissible. The police response included deploying wireless vans and requesting assistance. Noorul Huda Maqbool Ahmed VS Ram Deo Tyagi - Supreme Court, Noorul Huda Maqbool Ahmed VS Ram Deo Tyagi - Crimes
Legal and Judicial Proceedings - The incident was discussed in court cases, with particular focus on the police firing and whether the use of force was justified. Evidence included witness testimonies and medical examinations. The courts examined whether the police acted within legal bounds and scrutinized the delay in registering offenses and potential political motivations. Witness testimonies varied, with some witnesses claiming no unusual incident was observed, while others confirmed police firing. Ram Deo Tyagi, IPS Retd VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay, State of Goa VS Baloo Kumar Singh - Bombay, ASHFAQUE AHMED vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - Bombay, ASHFAQUE AHMED AND ANR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - Bombay
Topographical and Factual Considerations - The topography of Suleman Bakery and the mosque influenced the police operation and subsequent investigations. The proximity of the bakery to the mosque and the positioning of police and suspects were critical in analyzing police conduct and the incident's sequence. Ashfaque Ahmed VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay
Additional Context and Witness Accounts - Witnesses like P.W.6 and P.W.4 provided accounts of the scene, with some stating they arrived after the incident. Medical and forensic evidence was collected, but some witnesses' statements were found to be inconsistent or false, raising questions about the credibility of certain testimonies. Rayappan VS State by the Inspector of Police, P. Puliampatti Police Station, Erode - Madras, State of Goa VS Baloo Kumar Singh - Bombay
Analysis and Conclusion:
The Suleman Bakery incident involved police firing during a tense situation, with conflicting accounts regarding the circumstances and justification for force used. The police version faced skepticism from the Commission, and legal proceedings highlighted discrepancies in witness testimonies and procedural delays. The topography and proximity to religious sites played a role in understanding the incident's complexity. Overall, the incident remains contentious, with judicial inquiries emphasizing the need for accountability and adherence to legal protocols.
The incident of Suleman Bakery is discussed at Report. On appreciation of the material before it, the Commission in its report has expressed dissatisfaction over the version of the police of the incident. ... There is one more very important factual aspect considered by the STF regarding the alleged incident and that is the topography of the Suleman Bakery and the Masjid. ... Ingale the alleged incident had commenced at 9.30 a.m. and continued for th....
A police officer from the Pydhonie Police Station, therefore, reported this incident to the control room and asked for help. One wireless van allegedly came to the spot and also noticed that some shots were fired from the building of the Suleman Bakery. ... By way of legal submissions, it was urged that there was already an FIR lodged at the Dongri police station about the happenings in Suleman bakery, therefore, there could be no second FIR in respect of the same incident. Section 161....
A police officer from the Pydhonie Police Station, therefore, reported this incident to the control room and asked for help. One wireless van allegedly came to the spot and also noticed that some shots were fired from the building of the Suleman Bakery. ... By way of legal submissions, it was urged that there was already an FIR lodged at the Dongri police station about the happenings in Suleman bakery, therefore, there could be no second FIR in respect of the same incident. Section 161....
The applicant was accused of involvement in a police firing incident resulting in the death of nine persons and injury to one. ... delay in registering the offense, political motivations behind the prosecution, the applicant's intention and involvement in the incident ... Staff has gone to a building in front of the Suleman bakery and there is firing going on from terrace towards Suleman bakery. This obviously means firing by police from the terrace of the opposite building towards #HL....
the Bakery. ... ... The incident cannot be considered in isolation but with the prior ... police officers Police officers went to site from where police firing was continued Accused Joint Commissioner asked persons inside bakery ... The learned counsel has further submitted that there was no need to break open the door of Suleman Bakery when everything was peaceful and not a single firearm was found in the bakery. ... The Bakery is adjacent to the mosque and in the s....
commonly known as Suleman Bakery incident. ... Tyagi, involved in the Suleman Bakery incident. ... The police had admittedly fired at the inmates of Suleman bakery and persons on the rooftop of Suleman bakery. ... The incident of Suleman Bakery is discussed at The incident of Suleman Usman Baker....
commonly known as Suleman Bakery incident. ... Tyagi, involved in the Suleman Bakery incident. ... The police had admittedly fired at the inmates of Suleman bakery and persons on the rooftop of Suleman bakery. ... The incident of Suleman Bakery is discussed at The incident of Suleman Usman Baker....
PW-1 was major and married at the time of the incident, with her husband working abroad at Dubai. PW-3, Dr. ... What is relevant is that even the said baker did not find the incident to be unusual. ... 18. There is no corroboration between PW-l and PW-8. ... Silvano Sapeco conducted the medical examination of the victim as well as the accused; PW-4, Shri Usman Suleman acted as one of the panch witnesses for the panchanama of the attachment of clothes of the accused; PW-5, Shri V. M. ... Thus, PW 1 falsely stated that she....
A licence coupled with grant must be one which is incident to the grant. 2. ... District Board, AIR 1940 Lahore 509, which had relied upon the opinion of Suleman, C. J. in mathuri vs. Bhola Nath, AIR 1934 All 517. The approach of the learned Single Judge in our opinion was erroneous. ... Mitter and latifur Rahaman, JJ. in the case of Arpan Ali (supra), where the said Bench at page 416 has clearly stated that the licence coupled with the grant in order to be irrevocable must be one which is incident to the grant. ... If in addition to the ....
A subsequent decision of this Court in Suleman Rahiman Mulani v. ... In the presence of P.W.6 is to the fact that he was standing in front of Saravana Bakery and had witnessed the scene. As stated supra, in the cross examination, he stated that only after the incident, he had come to the scene of the occurrence. ... It is the specific evidence of P.W.4 is that he had witnessed the incident, he came to know about the accident, after the incident. 12. ... Admittedly, neither in Ex.P2/Observation Mahazar n....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.