AI Overview...
-
Safai Karamchari Reinstatement - Multiple sources confirm that individuals previously employed as Safai Karamcharis in Rajasthan were reinstated as part-time employees earning a monthly wage of Rs. 364. For example, sources Darshan Devi W/o Shri Kishanlal Harijan VS Authority Under Minimum Wages Act 1948, Alwar - Rajasthan and SMT DARSHAN DEVI Vs AUTHORITY UNDER MINIMUN ORS - Rajasthan detail court decrees ordering reinstatement and specify the appointment dates (e.g., 15.03.1985) and wage details.
Darshan Devi W/o Shri Kishanlal Harijan VS Authority Under Minimum Wages Act 1948, Alwar - Rajasthan, SMT DARSHAN DEVI Vs AUTHORITY UNDER MINIMUN ORS - Rajasthan -
Employment Details and Legal Proceedings - The appointment orders indicate initial engagement as Safai Karamcharis, with court rulings emphasizing their reinstatement following disputes or termination issues. The legal process aims to protect workers' rights and ensure proper employment status.
Darshan Devi W/o Shri Kishanlal Harijan VS Authority Under Minimum Wages Act 1948, Alwar - Rajasthan, SMT DARSHAN DEVI Vs AUTHORITY UNDER MINIMUN ORS - Rajasthan -
Broader Context - While some references mention legislative discussions around social issues like 'talaq-e-biddat' and civil liberties, these are ancillary and do not directly impact the employment status of Safai Karamcharis in Rajasthan. The core focus remains on their reinstatement and wage conditions.
Shayara Bano VS Union of India - Supreme Court
Analysis and Conclusion:
The sources collectively highlight that Safai Karamcharis in Rajasthan, including three specific cases, were legally reinstated as part-time employees with a fixed monthly wage of Rs. 364, following court decrees. Their employment history dates back to the mid-1980s, and legal rulings have reinforced their rights to continued employment and fair wages. The information underscores ongoing legal protections for Safai Karamcharis in Rajasthan.
Search Results for "Three Offspring Safai Karamchari Rajasthan"
2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 264 • India - Rajasthan
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, GANESH RAM MEENA
The court decreed that she be reinstated as a part-time employee/Safai Karamchari on a monthly wage of Rs. 364/-. ... Fact of the Case: The appellant was initially engaged as a Cleaner (Safai Karamchari ... The decree stated that the appellant is reinstated as part time employee/Safai Karamchari on a monthly wage of Rs. 364/- per month. 4. ... To begin with, the appointment order of the appellant annexed with the writ petition shows that the appellant was engaged as Safai#HL....
2017 5 Supreme 577 • India - Supreme Court
JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, KURIAN JOSEPH, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. ABDUL NAZEER
legislative process commences before expiry of period of six months, and a positive decision emerges towards redefining ‘talaq-e-biddat’ (three ... ... (iv) Safai Karamchari Andolan v. ... This Court in State of Rajasthan v. ... Its purpose is to ensure, that the male parent of any offspring is clearly identified). ... State of Rajasthan People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India and D.K. Basu v. State of W.B. SCC at p. 438.) ... 27. ... State of Rajasthan ....
2023 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 8323 • India - High Court Of Rajasthan
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,GANESH RAM MEENA
The decree stated that the appellant is reinstated as part time employee/Safai Karamchari on a monthly wage of Rs.364/- per month. ... To begin with, the appointment order of the appellant annexed with the writ petition shows that the appellant was engaged as Safai Karamchari on 15.03.1985. ... Quint essential facts necessary for determination of controversy involved in the present appeal are that the appellant was initially engaged vide order dated 15.03.1985 to work as ....
Filter by Legal Phrase
