AI Overview...
-
Upasana Mishra in Criminal Law - The case involves a criminal appeal where the Supreme Court discussed the maintainability of petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C., referencing judgments such as Raj Kapoor v. State and Prabhu Chawla. The Court emphasized the importance of procedural correctness in criminal appeals and the scope of jurisdiction Golu VS State of U. P. - Allahabad.
-
Upasana Mishra in Civil and Property Disputes - Several cases involve property and contractual disputes. For example, in the case of Upasana Constructions Pvt. Ltd., evidence was led through witnesses (DW.1 to DW.8), and issues of inheritance rights and material alterations were examined. The judgment discussed the rights of M/s Upasana Construction Pvt. Ltd. to vacate premises based on legal inheritance and alterations Triyugi Narain Mishra VS Dr. (Mrs. ) Kala Mehta - Rajasthan.
-
Upasana Mishra in Landmark Judgments - The Supreme Court and High Courts referred to cases like Upasana Bali v. State of Jharkhand, involving international residence issues, and Sarala Baby v. State of Kerala, concerning family and personal law. These judgments highlight the broader legal principles related to jurisdiction and personal status Ami Ranjan VS State of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana.
-
Upasana Mishra in Evidence and Procedure - In cases like Lokesh Mishra, statements under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and the examination of victims in cases of child abuse were discussed. The court analyzed the credibility of statements, injuries, and evidence collection procedures, emphasizing the importance of proper legal procedures in sensitive cases Ishwer Soni VS State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) - Delhi.
-
Upasana Mishra in Commercial and Financial Cases - In disputes involving companies, such as the settlement between Upasana Colonizers and Kajaria, the courts examined agreements, payments, and memoranda of understanding. The decisions reflect on the enforceability of agreements and financial transactions BELTAS MERCHANTS PRIVATE LIMITED VS INDIAN FIBRES LIMITED - Calcutta.
-
Upasana Mishra in Cheque Dishonour and Negotiable Instruments - The case of Upasana Mishra v. Trek Technology India Pvt. Ltd. involved interpretation of Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, focusing on vicarious liability of directors and the nature of demand notices, clarifying legal obligations in cheque bounce cases GODREJ-GE APPLIANCES LTD vs JOHNSON JOHN - Kerala.
-
Analysis and Conclusion - Across various cases, Upasana Mishra's name appears in contexts of criminal appeals, property disputes, contractual matters, evidence procedures, and financial litigations. The recurring themes include the importance of procedural correctness, legal rights in property and contractual rights, and the interpretation of statutory provisions. These cases collectively illustrate her involvement in diverse legal issues, highlighting the importance of legal clarity and adherence to procedural norms in judicial proceedings.
References - Upasana VS National Insurance Company Ltd. - Allahabad - Triyugi Narain Mishra VS Dr. (Mrs. ) Kala Mehta - Rajasthan - Ami Ranjan VS State of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana - Ishwer Soni VS State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) - Delhi - Amina Begumq VS Ramzan - Rajasthan - BELTAS MERCHANTS PRIVATE LIMITED VS INDIAN FIBRES LIMITED - Calcutta - R. N. Raje VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay - Golu VS State of U. P. - Allahabad - GODREJ-GE APPLIANCES LTD vs JOHNSON JOHN - Kerala - Vipul Medcorp Tpa Pvt. Ltd. VS Central Board of Direct Taxes - Delhi
Search Results for "Upasana Mishra Referred Cases"
2022 0 Supreme(All) 89 • India - Allahabad
Heard Shri Nigamendra Shukla, learned counsel for the appellants; Shri Om Prakash Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents; and perused the record. 2. ... This appeal, at the behest of the claimants, challenges the judgment dated 4.10.2016 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court No.15, Ghaziabad (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal') in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.313 of 2012 awarding a sum of Rs.4,52,000/- with
2001 0 Supreme(Raj) 1581 • India - Rajasthan
J.C.VERMA
Upasana Constructions Pvt. ... Upasana Construction Pvt. ... Upasana Construction by Mrs. ... The defendant had produced DW.1 Triyugi Narain Mishra, DW.2 Bhagat Singh, DW.3 Amar Singh, DW.4 Mahendra Kumar, DW.5 Ramavtar, DW.6 Jyoti Mathur, DW.7 Balram and DW.8 Vijay Kumar as oral evidence. ... 7. ... ... (6A) Whether M/s Upasana Construction Pvt. Ltd. has not inherited the right from plaintiff No. 1 to get the premises vacated on the ground of material alteration and he is not entitled to obtain the d....
2021 0 Supreme(P&H) 567 • India - Punjab and Haryana
RITU BAHRI, ARCHANA PURI
Learned counsel for the appellants has referred to a judgment passed by the Division Bench of High Court of Jharkhand in Upasana Bali and another vs. State of Jharkhand and others, (2013) 1 AIR Jhar R 741, wherein the husband was citizen of Sweden and the wife was residing in Australia. ... He has further referred to the judgment passed by the Kerala High Court in Sarala Baby vs. ... Learned State counsel has referred to the judgment passed by the Division Bench of Kerala High Court in Deepak Krishan and another vs. ... ....
2020 0 Supreme(Del) 963 • India - Delhi
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Upasana Rai and Dr. Vikas, simple recording of statement of victim u/s 164 Cr.P.C. by Ms. ... Dealing with this issue in a case of a child rape, a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Lokesh Mishra v. ... In this regard, he referred to the suggestions given to the child victim, her mother, the statement of the accused recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and the testimony of Mr. Pritam Singh, who was examined as DW-1. ... On general examination, he did not notice any external injury and referred the victim to EMO (Obsc & Gyna....
2004 0 Supreme(Raj) 761 • India - Rajasthan
SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Thelearned Counsel for the defendants-respondents has placed reliance on the decision in the cases of Triyugi Narain Mishra vs. MIs Upasana Construction Pvt. Ltd., 1999 (1) WLC (Raj.) 128 and Star Construction and Transport Co. & Ors. vs. The India Cements Limited, 2001 WLC (SC) 206. ... admitted the execution of power of attorney dtd. 12.2002 in favour of Sahabuddin and the same has been produced and a recital of the power of attorney dtd. 12.2002 executed by the defendants-respondents in favour of Sahabuddin reveals that Sahabuddin was ....
2019 0 Supreme(Cal) 208 • India - Calcutta
I.P.MUKERJI
In 2007, the company entered into an agreement to sell the property to Upasana and Kajaria. ... Upasana Colonizers vide order dated 08.02.2013 of this Bench in CA No.316/2012. ... 28. ... Ltd. they had paid Rs.11,13,80,741/- to Upasana colonizers and Rs.3 crores out of a settled amount of Rs.12,76,91,111/- to Kajaria Housing. An alleged Memorandum of Understanding dated 27th December, 2010 was made by the first respondent company with Upasana recording the above settlement. ... In this connection he also referr....
2000 0 Supreme(Bom) 601 • India - Bombay
UPASANI PRATIBHA
Dinesh Mishra)1. ... 4.Mr. ... PRATIBHA UPASANI, J.:---This Criminal Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner/original accused No, 1, being aggrieved by the order dated 10th October, 1994 passed by the Special Judge, Solapur in C.R. No. 300 of 1993 against the petitioner and three others. ... ... 3.The petitioner has stated in his petition that one Nagnath Mallikarjun Kalburgi, a resident of Kamala Nagar, Solapur, was a history sheeter and was involved in several cases with various police stations of Solapur.
2021 0 Supreme(All) 922 • India - Allahabad
SANGEETA CHANDRA
The Supreme Court in paragraph-5 of the judgment rendered in Prabhu Chawla (supra) has referred paragraph-10 of the judgment rendered in Raj Kapoor vs. State, 1980 (1) SCC 43 and observed thus: “5. Mr. ... It has been submitted that the appellants therein Prabhu Chawla, Jagdish Upasane and others had filed a Criminal Appeal No. 24 of 2009 where the High Court of Rajasthan had dismissed the petitions preferred by the appellants under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on the ground that they were not maintainable as the ... But such cases#HL_EN....
2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 14584 • India - High Court of Kerala
C.S. Sudha, J
interpreted Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing the vicarious liability of directors in cheque dishonour cases ... 12.Relying on the decision of the Apex Court in Upasana Mishra v. Trek Technology India Pvt. Ltd. (Special Leave Petition (Crl.) ... In Upasana Mishra (supra), notice was issued demanding an omnibus amount of ₹6,50,000/- which included interest, damages and notice charges. The demand for ₹6,50,000/- admittedly was not the cheque amount. ... Meenakshi Marwah,....
2011 0 Supreme(Del) 612 • India - Delhi
DIPAK MISRA, SANJIV KHANNA
Upasana Hospital [1997] 225 ITR 845 (Ker.)). ... 16. At the same time, it has been held that the word "business" is of a wider import than the word "profession". ... to in Clause (a), or ... (ii) thirty thousand rupees, in the case of fees for technical services referred to in Clause (b), or ... (iii) thirty thousand rupees, in the case of royalty referred to in Clause (c), or ... (iv) twenty thousand rupees, ... Section 194J of the Act applies when a person (including an individual or Hindu Undivided Family covered by the proviso) is res....
Filter by Legal Phrase
