AI Overview

AI Overview...

References: - CHARANJIT DUDEJA VS GOVERNMENT OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI - Delhi, SUMIT ARORA VS STATE OF DELHI - Delhi, AMAR SINGH VS GOVERNMENT OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI - Delhi, G. C. KAUSHAL,IPS VS PRESIDING OFFICER CAT - Delhi, Union of India, rep. by its Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Prosecution Cell, Customs House, Chennai VS A. S. A. Kabir - Madras, State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its District Collector VS Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareswarar Devasthanam, Madurai through its Executive Officer/Joint Commissioner - Madras, B. Bhaskar VS Authorised Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Forest Officer, Tripura - Andhra Pradesh, Shakina VS Delhi Development Authority - Delhi, Lalji Ram Tiu VS State Of Jharkhand - Jharkhand, LAVKUSH KUMAR and ORS vs THE STATE OF BIHAR and ORS - Patna

Search Results for "When the Matter is Seized before the Hon Ble Supreme Court"

CHARANJIT DUDEJA VS GOVERNMENT OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI

2002 0 Supreme(Del) 442 India - Delhi

H.R.MALHOTRA, A.K.SIKRI

discussed the problem of illegal squatting and encroachment on foot-paths and roads, referencing the Supreme Court order in Gainda ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the problem of illegal squatting and encroachment persisted despite measures ... spirited person - illegal squatting and encroachment on foot-path and roads - AIR 1998 SC 2363, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The court ... The respondent-MCD filed counter-affidavit dated 26. 3. 2001 wherein it is mentioned that the Hon#HL....

SUMIT ARORA VS STATE OF DELHI

2006 0 Supreme(Del) 540 India - Delhi

R.C.JAIN

Finding of the Court: The court found that the petitioner had subjected himself to the jurisdiction of the courts in ... Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner's actions in approaching the courts in Punjab and Haryana precluded him ... and for quashing the FIR in question; and his prayer having been declined throughout by those courts; and thereafter he having approached the Hon ble supreme Court with a Special Leave Petition, which is still ....

AMAR SINGH VS GOVERNMENT OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI

2003 0 Supreme(Del) 88 India - Delhi

before the Supreme Court. ... the petitioners to approach the Supreme Court for relief. ... Threat of impounding autos for not being converted to CNG single fuel mode, undertakings given by petitioners, and the pending matter ... by the Hon ble Supreme Court. ... Even otherwise there is force in the contention of learned Counsel for respondents that as the Apex Court is seized of the mat....

G. C. KAUSHAL,IPS VS PRESIDING OFFICER CAT

2002 0 Supreme(Del) 417 India - Delhi

A.K.SIKRI, H.R.MALHOTRA

Finding of the Court: The court found that the application was barred by constructive res judicata, and that the ACRs ... The court also held that the Tribunal's decision did not warrant judicial review. ... The court found that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that he was not aware of the alleged forgery and fabrication at the time ... ... ( 22 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner, the Hon ble Supreme Court was also aware that the National Commissio....

Union of India, rep.  by its Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Prosecution Cell, Customs House, Chennai VS A. S. A.  Kabir

2011 0 Supreme(Mad) 1925 India - Madras

S.NAGAMUTHU

The High Court found that the recovered gold and silver bars were produced before the Court during trial, leading to the presumption ... The Court held that the accused was liable to be punished under Section 135(1)(b) of the Act. ... The trial Court found that the complainant had failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt and acquitted the respondent. ... The learned Special Public Prosecutor would submit that in the confiscation proceedings, the accused claimed M.O.1 series as the one seized fro....

State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.  by its District Collector VS Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareswarar Devasthanam, Madurai through its Executive Officer/Joint Commissioner

2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 1632 India - Madras

G. JAYACHANDRAN, K. K. RAMAKRISHNAN

reserved forest by the Forest Department - Plaintiffs claimed that the land is 'Devadayam' property granted to the Temple, but the court ... 24, 32, 108, 125, and 126) ... ... (B) Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Section 96 - Bar on civil suits during certain periods - The court ... It is also contended that the Court below failed to take the subsequent development in the issue, wherein, the Hon''ble Supreme Court has seized of the matter#HL_....

B. Bhaskar VS Authorised Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Forest Officer, Tripura

2002 0 Supreme(AP) 128 India - Andhra Pradesh

N.V.RAMANA

Constitution of India – Article 226 - Illegal and void - Admission stage – Allegations - That without his knowledge his lorry was seized ... received possibility of lodging said complaint after incident by ante-dating same cannot be ruled out - All these are however, matters ... The observations of the Hon ble Supreme Court in Krishnan s case has emphasised these settled legal principles and is not a curtailment of the power of judicial review of the High Court under ....

Shakina VS Delhi Development Authority

2020 0 Supreme(Del) 715 India - Delhi

PRATHIBA M.SINGH

Finding of the Court: The court found that the STF had taken a considered view in the matter and the petitioner was ... The STF had taken a considered view in the matter and the petitioner was not entitled to any relief. ... Ratio Decidendi: The STF had taken a considered view in the matter, and the petitioner was not entitled to any relief as she ... (and connected matters) taken note of the fact that the Hon''ble Supreme #HL_ST....

Lalji Ram Tiu VS State Of Jharkhand

2018 0 Supreme(Jhk) 2057 India - Jharkhand

RAJESH SHANKAR

certificate Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was advised to pursue the election petition and the matter ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the dispute regarding the caste status of the respondent no. 8 should be ... The court also held that the petitioner lacked the locus standi to challenge the caste certificate of the respondent no. 8. ... The learned counsel for the respondent - State submits that the Caste Scrutiny Committee is seized of the #HL_START....

LAVKUSH KUMAR and ORS vs THE STATE OF BIHAR and ORS

India - Patna

ble Supreme Court. The matter is yet seized by the Hon? ... ble Supreme Court in the matter of Andhra Pradesh Public Service ... ble Supreme Court over the years. ... ble Supreme Court in the proceeding pending before it.

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top