AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Minor's Need to File Suit to Declare Sale Null and Void -
    The sources do not explicitly address whether a minor must file a suit to declare the sale of his property as null and void. However, general legal principles suggest that if a minor's property sale is challenged, the minor or his legal guardian typically needs to initiate legal proceedings to declare the sale null and void, especially if the sale was made without proper consent or legal capacity.
    Analysis and Conclusion — The provided references do not directly answer the query. Typically, a minor cannot independently file a suit; a guardian or legal representative must do so to contest or declare the sale invalid. It is advisable for the minor or guardian to file a suit to seek declaration of nullity if the sale was made improperly or without lawful authority.

Search Results for "Whether Minor Need to File Suit to Declare the Sale of his Property as Null Amd Void"

Converted As Suo Motu Pil Vs Union Of India

2025 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 3961 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J

and void. ... It was submitted that every form of mineral which was exported have suffered royalty and properly declared. There must be a mismatch in the interpretation of quantum of royalty to be collected whether on the ad valorem price of Orissa or Tamil Nadu is but a technicality and not evasion. ... The mineral containing radioactivity is the property of Government of India IV. Scope of the Public Interest Litigation (PIL): 11. ... (6) Whether the reports and findings submitted ....

SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES-ON-RECORD ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA

2015 8 Supreme 65 India - Supreme Court

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J.CHELAMESWAR, MADAN B.LOKUR, KURIAN JOSEPH, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

While examining the question, whether the right to property could be included in the “basic structure or framework” of the Constitution, the answer rendered was in the negative. ... This is apart from a consideration as to whether or not the judgment is (or is not) ultimately declared invalid or void: whether in the first instance or by Review or in a Curative Petition.” ... The above prayer for my recusal was supported by Mr. Mathews J. ... In order to support the aforesaid contention....

Converted as Suo Motu PIL vs Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to Government, Government of India

2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 3826 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Honourable Mr Justice S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, M.JOTHIRAMAN

and void. ... It was submitted that every form of mineral which was exported have suffered royalty and properly declared. There must be a mismatch in the interpretation of quantum of royalty to be collected whether on the ad valorem price of Orissa or Tamil Nadu is but a technicality and not evasion. ... The mineral containing radioactivity is the property of Government of India IV. Scope of the Public Interest Litigation (PIL): 11. ... (6) Whether the reports and findings submitted ....

Shakuntala Yadav - Plaintiffs VS Yadvinder Singh - Defendants

1998 0 Supreme(P&H) 817 India - Punjab and Haryana

V.K.BALI

Prayer has also been made to declare the sale deeds or any other document/deed which may have come into existence after the filing of the suit to be illegal, null and void, not adversely affecting the rights of the plaintiffs in any manner. ... Whether the plaintiffs are the owners in possession of the suit land ? ... 2. Whether the judgment and decree dated 29.10.1990 passed in suit No. 1588 of 1990 are illegal, null#HL_E....

ARROW ENGINEERING LIMITED vs CHINTAN TRIBHUVAN KAPDI AND ANR.

2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 11428 India - High Court of Bombay

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA

of the property is misconceived. ... The learned Arbitrator has failed to consider whether there was an obligation on the part of the Respondents to pay development charges and whether that was provided in the agreement. ... Savant has submitted that the judgments cited by the Peti- tioner to contend that the agreement is void if the property is not identi- fied is not applicable as in those cases there was a dispute between the parties in respect of the property that was agreed to be ....

ARROW ENGINEERING LTD. vs RITESH MULJIBHAI PATEL

2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 10353 India - High Court of Bombay

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA

of the property is misconceived. ... The learned Arbitrator has failed to consider whether there was an obligation on the part of the Respondents to pay development charges and whether that was provided in the agreement. ... Savant has submitted that the judgments cited by the Peti- tioner to contend that the agreement is void if the property is not identi- fied is not applicable as in those cases there was a dispute between the parties in respect of the property that was agreed to be ....

ARROW ENGINEERING LIMITED vs RASIKLAL RANCHHODDAS BHAVSAR AND ANR

2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 10976 India - High Court of Bombay

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA

of the property is misconceived. ... The learned Arbitrator has failed to consider whether there was an obligation on the part of the Respondents to pay development charges and whether that was provided in the agreement. ... Savant has submitted that the judgments cited by the Peti- tioner to contend that the agreement is void if the property is not identi- fied is not applicable as in those cases there was a dispute between the parties in respect of the property that was agreed to be ....

ARROW ENGINEERING LIMITED vs AMI PARAG MEHTA AND ANR.

2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 10979 India - High Court of Bombay

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA

of the property is misconceived. ... The learned Arbitrator has failed to consider whether there was an obligation on the part of the Respondents to pay development charges and whether that was provided in the agreement. ... Savant has submitted that the judgments cited by the Peti- tioner to contend that the agreement is void if the property is not identi- fied is not applicable as in those cases there was a dispute between the parties in respect of the property that was agreed to be ....

ARROW ENGINEERING LIMITED vs AMI PARAG MEHTA AND ANR.

2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 10977 India - High Court of Bombay

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA

of the property is misconceived. ... The learned Arbitrator has failed to consider whether there was an obligation on the part of the Respondents to pay development charges and whether that was provided in the agreement. ... Savant has submitted that the judgments cited by the Peti- tioner to contend that the agreement is void if the property is not identi- fied is not applicable as in those cases there was a dispute between the parties in respect of the property that was agreed to be ....

ARROW ENGINEERING LIMITED vs DINESH JHAKSANIYA

2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 10978 India - High Court of Bombay

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA

of the property is misconceived. ... The learned Arbitrator has failed to consider whether there was an obligation on the part of the Respondents to pay development charges and whether that was provided in the agreement. ... Savant has submitted that the judgments cited by the Peti- tioner to contend that the agreement is void if the property is not identi- fied is not applicable as in those cases there was a dispute between the parties in respect of the property that was agreed to be ....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top