AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Largest Ever Constitution Bench - The case heard by the largest ever Supreme Court Constitution Bench comprised 13 judges. This historic bench was convened to address significant constitutional issues, notably the appointment and functioning of the judiciary, and to settle conflicting judgments on these matters SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES-ON-RECORD ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA - Supreme Court.

  • Context and Significance - The 13-judge bench was constituted to resolve critical questions surrounding judicial appointments, the primacy of the judiciary in such appointments, and to uphold the basic features of the Constitution. This bench is notable for being the largest in the Supreme Court's history, emphasizing the importance of the issues at hand SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES-ON-RECORD ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA - Supreme Court.

  • Main Case and Issues - While the specific case name isn't directly provided, the bench was tasked with examining the constitutional validity of the collegium system, the appointment process of judges, and related judicial reforms. The case aimed to clarify the role of the judiciary versus the executive in appointments, ensuring adherence to constitutional principles SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES-ON-RECORD ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA - Supreme Court.

  • Insights and Main Points - The formation of such a large bench underscores the gravity of the constitutional questions involved, especially concerning the independence of the judiciary and the safeguards of the basic structure of the Constitution. It reflects the Court’s effort to deliver a definitive judgment on the contentious issues of judicial appointments and reforms SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES-ON-RECORD ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA - Supreme Court.

Analysis and Conclusion:
The landmark case heard by the largest ever 13-judge Supreme Court Constitution Bench was centered on the constitutional validity of judicial appointment processes, particularly the collegium system, and the balance of power between judiciary and executive. This historic hearing aimed to settle long-standing disputes and reaffirm the judiciary’s primacy in safeguarding the Constitution's core features.

Search Results for "Which Case was Heard by Largest Ever Constitution Bench by 13 Supreme Court Judges"

SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES-ON-RECORD ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA

2015 8 Supreme 65 India - Supreme Court

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J.CHELAMESWAR, MADAN B.LOKUR, KURIAN JOSEPH, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

to give their comment on appointment of CJI and Judges of Supreme Court - There is also an opportunity to suggest names before initiation ... Held, New scheme damages the basic feature of Constitution under which primacy in appointment of judges has to be with judiciary ... - new scheme damages the basic feature of the Constitution under which primacy in appointment of judges has to be with the judiciary ... would become the largest single litigants ....

C.J. JOVESON Vs THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF KERALA HIGH COURT

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 56106 India - High Court of Kerala

SHAJI P.CHALY, J

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the Supreme Court's previous rulings on judicial appointments established a clear ... Fact of the Case: Petitioners challenged the collegium's recommendations for judges based on claims of nepotism, arguing ... Issues: The primary issues revolved around whether the collegium system for appointing judges was appropriate under Articles ... Courts, a three-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court i....

Municipal Corporation Of Delhi VS Gurnam Kaur

1988 0 Supreme(SC) 580 India - Supreme Court

A.P.SEN, B.C.RAY, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH

that sometime appellant Municipal Corporation of Delhi sought police help to clear the pavement near hospital which is one of the largest ... was justified, in facts and circumstances of case, in issuing a direction to appellant-Municipal Corporation of Delhi to construct ... of the Subordinate Judge, against the Municipal Corporation seeking the relief of perpetual injunction restraining appellant, its ... Eventually, Desai, J. speaking for a Bench of two Judges by his order dated March 29, 1985 made a....

STATE OF U. P.  VS KHEMPAL

2016 0 Supreme(All) 898 India - Allahabad

SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI

Above noted judgments of Hon’ble Supreme Court and the prevailing situation as afore-noted clearly indicates that today State is the largest litigant. It appears to be acting as an ordinary litigant in contrast to a model litigant. ... Because of prevailing situation of litigation by Governments, Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. ... In this country the State is the largest litigant to-day and the huge expenditure involved makes ....

SUPREME COURT ADVOCATE ON RECORD ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA

1993 0 Supreme(SC) 922 India - Supreme Court

S. P. BHARUCHA, S. R. PANDIAN, M. M. PUNCHHI, KULDIP SINGH, G. N. RAY, YOGESHWAR DAYAL, A. S. ANAND, A. M. AHMADI, J. S. VERMA

in the Supreme court and the several High courts of the country and for some ancillary orders/directions in regard to the main prayer ... service - Sought for are to issue a mandamus to the Union of India (hereinafter referred to as the uoi) to fill the vacancies of Judges ... There are various provisions in the Constitution which indicate that the Constitution has not provided something like a hands off ... Supreme Court Judges are not elected, they....

Shanmugam General Secretary VS Government of Tamil Nadu rep by its Principal Secretary

2011 0 Supreme(Mad) 3982 India - Madras

K.CHANDRU

Fact of the Case: The petitioner union, which was the largest following among workers working in the Transport Corporations ... /2010, Election Officer has observed that the above said declaration will abide by the result of the Supreme Court. ... , had secured 57.31% and got elected, but however in view of the order dated 29.10.2010 of Supreme Court of India in SLP C.C.No.16146 ... The source to which they trace their so called right is not to any statute nor a law laid down by the ....

The Southern Railway Mazdoor Union VS The Railway Board & Others

2003 0 Supreme(Mad) 1628 India - Madras

R.JAYASIMHA BABU, P.K.MISRA

: The Indian Railways, the largest single employer in the country, incurred significant annual expenditure on office bearers ... Trade Unions Act - Railway Reforms Committee - Recognition Norms - Membership Verification - Recognition Policy Fact of the Case ... The Court closed the related proceedings. ... Yet another two Judge Bench in the case of Punjab Communications Ltd. vs. ... Bench of the Court, in the case of Balco employe....

Revenue Bar Association, Represented by its Secretary, Duwari Anand, Chennai VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi

2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 1824 India - Madras

S.MANIKUMAR, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

Services Tax Act, 2017, more particularly, Sections 109 and 110 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 relating to constitution ... would become the largest single litigants before the Supreme Court and the High Courts. ... Similarly, the Supreme Court in the case of, Union of India v. ... It is the case of the petitioner that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in R.K.Jain Vs. ... Mr.Arvind Datar is justified in....

Mohd.  Mohsin Khan alias Bhooria VS State

2013 0 Supreme(Raj) 204 India - Rajasthan

AJAY RASTOGI, RAGHUVENDRA S.RATHORE, V.K.MATHUR

1973, and various Supreme Court judgments, held that the guidelines laid down by the Division Bench in Tahir Khan alias Shakeel ( ... The court also held that the Supreme Court's judgment in Smt. Akhtari Bi v. ... State of Haryana (1994) 4 RCR 600, which were affirmed by the Supreme Court in Surender Singh v. ... ), in the light of various Supreme Court judgments noted above. ... Union of India (AIR 1978 Supreme #H....

Balwant Singh VS State of Rajasthan

1982 0 Supreme(Raj) 152 India - Rajasthan

G.M.LODHA

extra-ordinary remedy under Art. 2 26 of the Constitution was never intended to encourage such litigations. ... ;In my view, classification of the concessional rates in the facts and circumstances of the case ... (f) Constitution of India—Art. 14 Presumption of constitutionality of an enactment—Court can take notice. ... However, Shri Mathur, in support of his above contention, invited my attention to the observations made by their Lordships of the Supreme Court (Seven Judges #HL_START....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top