IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. MANIKUMAR, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, JJ.
Revenue Bar Association, Represented by its Secretary, Duwari Anand, Chennai & Another - Appellants
Versus
Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi & Others - Respondents
W.P. Nos. 21147, 21148 & 14919 of 2018 & WMP. Nos. 24826, 24827, 17635 & 17636 of 2018
Decided On : 20-09-2019
Constitution of India, Article 22614, 21, 50, 366(12-A), 246-A(2) - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 195 - Indian Penal Code -Section 196 - Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Sections 109 and 110 - Appointment and condition of services - Defective and unconstitutional - Issuance of writ of declaration - Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ of declaration, to declare Chapter XVIII of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, more particularly, Sections 109 and 110 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 relating to constitution of Appellate Tribunal and qualification, appointment and condition of services of its members as void, defective and unconstitutional, being violative of Articles 14, 21, 50 of Constitution of India, and doctrines of separation of powers and independence of judiciary - Held, (i) Section 110(1)(b)(iii) of the CGST Act which states that a Member of the Indian Legal Services, who has held a post not less than Additional Secretary for three years, can be appointed as a Judicial Member in GSTAT, is struck down - (ii) Section 109(3) and 109(9) of the CGST Act, 2017, which prescribes that the tribunal shall consists of one Judicial Member, one Technical Member (Centre) and one Technical Member (State), is struck down - (iii) argument that Sections 109 & 110 of the CGST Act, 2017 and TNGST Act, 2017 are ultra vires, in so far as exclusion of lawyers from the scope and view for consideration as members of the tribunal, is rejected. However, we recommend Parliament must consider to amend section for including lawyers to be eligible to be appointed as Judicial Members to the Appellate Tribunal in view of the issues which are likely to arise for adjudication under the CGST Act and in order to maintain uniformity in various statutes - Writ petitions are allowed
ORDER :
Subramonium Prasad, J.
(Prayer in WP No.21147 of 2018: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ of declaration, to declare Chapter XVIII of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, more particularly, Sections 109 and 110 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 relating to constitution of the Appellate Tribunal and qualification, appointment and condition of services of its members as void, defective and unconstitutional, being violative of Articles 14, 21, 50 of the Constitution of India, and doctrines of separation of powers and independence of judiciary, which are parts of the basic structure of the Constitution and further contrary to the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India Vs. R.Gandhi (2010) 11 SCC 1.
Prayer in WP No.21148 of 2018: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ of declaration, to declare Chapter XVIII of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, more particularly, Sections 109 and 110 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 relating to constitution of the Appellate Tribunal and qualification, appointment and condition of services of its members as void, defective and unconstitutional, being violative of Articles 14, 21, 50 of the Constitution of India, and doctrines of separation of powers and independence of judiciary, which are parts of the basic structure of the Constitution and further contrary to the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India Vs. R.Gandhi (2010) 11 SCC 1.
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ of declaration, to declare Section 109 of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 and Tamil Nadu Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017, constituting Appellate Tribunal and Section 110 of the CGST Act and TNGST Act relating to qualification, appointment and condition of services of its members as ultra vires of Article 14 and 50 of the Constitution of India, and being violative of the doctrine of separation of powers and independence of judiciary, which are parts of the basic structure of the Constitution and further contrary to the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India Vs. R.Gandhi (2010) 11 SCC 1 and Kesavananda Bharati Vs. State of Kerala [(1973) 4 SCC 225].)
1. Challenge in these writ petitions is to declare Sections 109 and 110 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [in short CGST Act, 2017] and Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [in short TNGST Act, 2017], relating to the constitution of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal and the qualification and appointment of members, as void, defective and unconstitutional, being violative of Articles 14, 21 and 50 of the Constitution of India and various judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
2. Article 246-A (Special provision with respect to goods and service tax) was inserted in the Constitution of India, by the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016. As per Article 246-A(1), notwithstanding anything contained in Articles 246 and 254, Parliament, and subject to clause (2), the Legislature of every State has the power to make laws with respect to goods and services tax imposed by the Union or the State.
3. Article 246-A(2) gives Parliament its exclusive power to make laws with respect to goods and services tax where the supply of goods, or of services, or both takes place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce.
4. Article 366(12-A), which was also inserted by the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016 defines, "goods and services tax" to mean any tax on supply of goods, or services or both, except taxes on the supply of alcoholic liquor for human consumption.
5. Chapter XVIII of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [in short CGST Act, 2017] and Chapter XVIII of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2
Associated Cement Companies Ltd. v. P.N. Sharma
Brij Mohan Lal v. Union of India
Columbia Sportswear Company Vs. Director of Income Tax
Jaswant Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Lakshmi Chand
Kesavananda Bharati Vs. State of Kerala
L.Chandrakumar Vs. Union of India
M.B.Majumdar Vs. Union of India
Madras Bar Assn. v. Union of India
Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India
Manak Lal (Shri), Advocate Vs. Prem Chand Singhvi and Others
Ministry of Health & Welfare, Government of Maharashtra v. S.C. Malte
Raikumar Shivhare Vs. Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement and ors.
S.P. Sampath Kumar v. Union of India
S.P. Sampath Kumar v. Union of India, (1987) 1 SCC 124 : (1987) 2 ATC 82
Shayara Bano Vs. Union of India
State of Karnataka v. Vishwabharathi House Building Coop. Society
State of Tamil Nadu v, Arulmurugan and Company
Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association Vs. Union of India
Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Union of India
Union of India v. Madras Bar Assn.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.