In Hosihyar Singh VS Anita - Rajasthan, the court recognized the person in possession under a supurdagi as the owner for legal proceedings, especially when the vehicle was registered in their name.
Owner's Responsibilities and Transfer of Vehicle
The owner or person holding a supurdagi is responsible for ensuring the vehicle's insurance and registration are valid. If the vehicle is transferred or sold, the new owner must update the registration and insurance, else the original owner remains liable.
In Ramesh Kumar VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, the court noted that vehicles seized should be returned to the owner after proper conditions, including insurance validity, are satisfied.
Insurance Liability and Vehicle Ownership
The insurance company's liability depends on the vehicle being registered in the owner's name and insured at the time of the incident. If the vehicle is transferred but the insurance policy remains in the original owner's name, the insurer may still be liable unless a proper transfer or notification is made.
The court in Sham Sunder VS National Insurance Co. Ltd. - Rajasthan held that the registered owner at the time of the accident is liable, even if the vehicle was taken on supurdagi.
Special Cases: Transfer, Sale, and Insurance Validity
When a vehicle is transferred or sold, the liability for insurance and legal responsibility shifts accordingly. If the transfer is incomplete or not properly registered, the original owner may still be held liable.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The entitlement to a vehicle released on supurdagi primarily belongs to the registered owner or the person holding a valid power of attorney (supurdagi). The owner’s liability for insurance and legal responsibilities depends on the registration status at the time of the incident. Proper transfer of ownership and insurance documentation are crucial to establish entitlement and liability. When ownership is disputed or vehicle transfer is incomplete, courts typically determine liability based on registration and possession at the relevant time.
References:
- Cholamandalm Insurance Company VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Sham Sunder VS National Insurance Co. Ltd. - Rajasthan, Amarjit Singh Chadha VS Harjit Singh - Crimes, Hosihyar Singh VS Anita - Rajasthan, Ramesh Kumar VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, 01700024720, SEEMA VS JASBIR - Delhi
. - Section 482 - NDPS Act - Vehicle seized in connection with NDPS offences - Insurance Company seeks permission to sell a vehicle ... released on supurdagi - The court allows the sale with conditions, emphasizing the vehicle should not be allowed to deteriorate. ... (Paras 7-8) ... ... Facts of the case: ... An Insurance Company seeks to sell a vehicle seized ... The vehicle in question has already been releas....
has not been given effect to in the record with Registering Authority — Registered owner had taken the vehicle on supurdagi from ... police custody after the accident claiming himself to be the owner of the vehicle — Sale was not complete in all respect — Held ... — Registered owner on the date of accident would be liable. ... The appellant was entitled to get the registration transferred in his name after clearance of the loan. ... Whether Pawan Kumar/ Sham Sunder/ B....
of the insurance company and the owner and driver of an offending tractor involved in a fatal accident. ... of the insurance company in the fatal accident. ... company in such cases. ... Hence, this appeal is allowed and award is set aside against the appellant and it is directed that the Insurance Company will be entitled to realise the amount which was paid under the head of no fault liability from the claimants. ... Respondent No....
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT - INSURANCE - LIABILITY OF INSURANCE COMPANY - OWNER OF VEHICLE - THIRD PARTY - QUANTUM OF COMPENSATION - INVESTMENT ... Whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation to the claimants? 5. ... The court held that the insurance company is liable to pay compensation to the claimants as the car was insured with the insurance ... company. ... Learned Counsel for the #HL....
would be deemed to be "owner" of vehicle - In present case, admittedly, motor vehicle was registered in name and on date of accident ... " means in whose name vehicle stands registered, and in whose possession vehicle is under a hire-purchase agreement, such a person ... on supurdaginama in favour of respondent complainant – Held , learned Tribunal was certainly justified in concluding that since "owner ... The borrower had the initial obligation to insure the vehicle....
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 457 - Order for release of car seized by police in a case, to the owner on supurdari - Vehicle ... by petitioner for release of vehicle to him on the ground that he has cancelled power of attorney - Order on this application will ... released to respondent who was holding, special power of attorney from regd. owner/petitioner after he executed supurdginama - Application ... This car stands registered in the name of the petitioner, vide Annexure P-2, and is also in....
Fact of the Case: The appellant, the owner of the vehicle, claimed to have transferred the vehicle to another person ... The court also discussed the deemed transfer of insurance under Section 157 and the liability of the insurer in case of vehicle transfer ... The court interpreted the definition of 'owner' under Section 2(30) and the requirements of insurance under Section 146 and Section ... Insurance Company etc. ... The #HL_S....
Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to the release of the seized items, including the motorcycle and mobile phone, ... is involved in a crime, it should be returned to the owner after imposing certain conditions, in the interest of both the owner ... : The court relied on the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai case, which held that even if a vehicle ... If the said vehicle is insured with the insurance company then ....
by respondent no.2 claiming himself to be owner of vehicle--From facts on record it cannot be said that sale of vehicle as claimed ... owner of vehicle in question at time of accident admitted--Truck in question was taken on superdari from police custody after accident ... Motor Vehicles Act, 1988--Compensation--Transfer of Vehicle--Liability to bear compensation--Fact that respondent no.2 was registered ... as also on the liability of the insurance company#....
It also held that non-disclosure of the owner's death rendered the insurance policy void. ... It also held that the insurance policy was void due to non-disclosure of the owner's death, dismissing the owner's appeal. ... The tribunal awarded compensation, but issues arose regarding the computation of dependency and the validity of the insurance policy ... The contentions that the insurance policy was void and the permit of the offending vehicle (also in the name of dead person) was not valid were accept....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.