AI Overview...
- Writ Petition No. 20604 of 2025 - Madhya Pradesh - Main points and insights:
- The petitioner, Prakash Upadhyay, is a senior advocate with over 20 years of practice in the Madhya Pradesh High Court. He belongs to a family of lawyers known for dedicated service Prakash Upadhyay vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh.
- The case involves the State of Madhya Pradesh and appears to concern legal or administrative issues, possibly related to land acquisition or other state actions, given the context of related cases and notices Prakash Upadhyay vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh.
- The reference to the Supreme Court judgment in State of Madhya Pradesh v. Narmada Bachao Andolan (2011) indicates that issues of land acquisition and deprivation of livelihood under Article 21 have been previously considered and clarified by the Court, emphasizing that mere deprivation does not automatically violate constitutional rights Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority VS Nirmala Devi - Supreme Court.
-
The case's timeline includes recent developments, with an extension of the deadline from 31.03.2025 to 31.05.2025, suggesting ongoing proceedings or deadlines related to the case or project Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority VS Nirmala Devi - Supreme Court.
-
Analysis and Conclusion:
- The petition likely addresses concerns related to land acquisition, livelihood, or administrative actions by the State of Madhya Pradesh.
- The Supreme Court's earlier ruling clarifies that deprivation of land or livelihood, in itself, does not necessarily violate constitutional rights if proper legal procedures are followed.
- The extension of deadlines indicates ongoing procedural or project-related adjustments, and the case remains under active judicial consideration.
- Overall, the case reflects the state's ongoing development projects and associated legal challenges, with the petitioner being a senior advocate representing possibly a legal or constitutional concern.
Search Results for "Wp no 20604 of 2025 Madhya Pardesh"
2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1061 • India - Supreme Court
J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
In State of Madhya Pradesh v. Narmada Bachao Andolan & Anr. reported in (2011) 7 SCC 639, this Court negated the argument that in case of land acquisition, the plea of deprivation of right to livelihood under Article 21 is sustainable. ... (vi) That earlier as per advertisement, the closing date was 31.03.2025 and now the same has been extended to 31.05.2025. ... Our order dated 05.03.2025 by itself would give more than a fair idea as regards the history of this litigation and the issues involved in th....
2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 6636 • India - High Court of Madhya Pradesh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRA ON THE 8th OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 WRIT PETITION No. 20604 of 2025 PRAKASH UPADHYAY Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ... It is the case of the petitioner that he is a designated Senior Advocate practicing in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh since last more than 20 years. He belongs to a family of lawyers who all have given dedicated service t....
Filter by Legal Phrase
