Subject :
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. The limited grievance raised by the appellants(legal heirs of the deceased) to assail the impugned order dated 23rd January, 2019 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh is that there was no reason for the High Court to have fixed a sum of ₹40,000/- (Rupees forty thousand only) payable to the appellant No.1(wife of the deceased) towards loss of consortium while depriving the children of the deceased of the said amount on a per head basis.
3. We may note that vide order dated 26th April, 2016, passed by the MACT, a sum of ₹1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) was awarded to the appellant No.1 towards loss of consortium. The said amount was reduced by the High Court to ₹40,000/- (Rupees forty thousand only). The High Court also scaled down the amount payable to the appellants towards loss of estate, love and affection from
₹1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) as awarded by the MACT, to ₹15,000/-
(Rupees fifteen thousand only).
4. Keeping in mind the fact that in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi and others 1 , the Constitution Bench has observed that all the dependents of the deceased are entitled to being awarded amounts separately towards loss of consortium and had awarded ₹40,000/- (Rupees forty thousand only) to each of the dependents in the said case, in the instant case too, it is deemed appropriate to modify the impugned judgment and direct that each of the four appellants (dependents) would be entitled to a sum of ₹40,000/- (Rupees forty thousand only) towards loss of consortium.
5. Further, it is deemed appropriate to direct that a consolidated sum of ₹70,000/- (Rupees seventy thousand only) under all conventional heads including loss of estate, love and affection be awarded to the appellants in place of ₹15,000/-
(Rupees fifteen thousand only), awarded by the High Court.
6. The impugned judgment is modified to the aforesaid extent. The respondent-Insurance Company is directed to deposit the additional amounts as directed above, within a period of four weeks from today along with simple interest @ 9 per cent per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of deposit.
……………………….......................J.
( HIMA KOHLI )
……………………….......................J.
( AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH )
NEW DELHI
01st FEBRUARY, 2024
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-01-2019 in FAO No. 4570/2016 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)
SHIBBO & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Respondent(s) ( IA No. 152300/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)
Date : 01-02-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Amrreeta Swaarup, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the court made the following
O R D E R
1. Application seeking exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned judgment is allowed.
2. Leave granted.
3. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order.
(Geeta Ahuja) (Nand Kishor)
Assistant Registrar-cum-PS Court Master (NSH)
(Signed Order is placed on the file)
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.