NEET-UG 2024 Exam Irregularities
Subject : Education - Entrance Examinations
The Supreme Court on Tuesday came down heavily on the National Testing Agency (NTA) and the Centre while hearing pleas related to alleged paper leaks and malpractices in the NEET-UG 2024 examination.
The top court bench, comprising Justices Vikram Nath and SVN
"If there is 0.001% negligence on the part of anyone it should be thoroughly dealt with," the Supreme Court said, adding that the court cannot forget the efforts of the children who have prepared for the exams.
The apex court also told the Centre and the NTA to not take petitions filed against the NEET-UG as adversarial litigation. It directed both the entities to admit and rectify any mistakes in conducting the test.
"As an agency which is conducting the examination, you must act fair. If there is a mistake, say yes, this is a mistake, and this is the action we are going to take. At least that inspires confidence in your performance," the top court told the NTA.
The Supreme Court is hearing a batch of petitions, raising allegations including paper leaks, awarding grace marks, and a significant increase in high scorers in the NEET-UG 2024 exam.
On June 14, the top court had issued notices to the Centre and the NTA on a plea requesting a CBI investigation into allegations of question paper leak. The notice came after the Centre informed the Supreme Court about its decision to cancel the scorecards of 1,563 NEET-UG 2024 candidates, who were awarded grace marks.
The Centre also told the Supreme Court that the affected students will soon be notified of their revised scores, which will exclude the grace marks that were previously awarded. The matter will be heard next on July 8.
NEET-UG 2024 exam - alleged irregularities - paper leaks - malpractices - grace marks - high scorers - thorough investigation - negligence - fairness in examination - student efforts - CBI probe - revised scores - re-test
#NEETUGIrregularities #SupremeCourtOnNEET #LegalNewsForLawyers
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Dismisses FIR Plea Against Rahul Gandhi
01 May 2026
Arbitrary Road Height Raising Banned Without Approval: Patna HC Enforces SOP, Penalizes Contractors
01 May 2026
Delhi HC Closes ANI's Copyright Suit Against PTI After Amicable Settlement Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC
01 May 2026
Post-Conviction NDPS Bail Can't Be Granted Solely on Long Incarceration; Section 37 Twin Conditions Mandatory: J&K&L High Court
01 May 2026
Defying Transfer Order Justifies Removal from Service Despite Family Care Plea: Orissa High Court
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
Administrative Actions Judged on Materials at Time of Decision, Not Subsequent Developments: Patna High Court
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.