Supreme Court Demands Urgent Compliance From Authorities On Illegal Construction And Stray Animal Menace
In a move to enforce urban discipline and public safety, the , led by Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice R. Mahadevan, has issued strict directives to state governments and municipal authorities nationwide. The Court is overseeing a critical matter regarding systemic violations of , unauthorized land use, and the failure of municipal bodies to maintain public areas.
Scaling Nationwide Accountability
The , expressing deep dissatisfaction with the lack of compliance by several states, formally impleaded all Chief Secretaries and Administrators of states and union territories as . The Court noted with concern that despite previous mandates, entities including the states of Mizoram, Punjab, Uttarakhand, and the Union Territory of Lakshadweep had failed to file mandatory . While the Court granted a temporary reprieve from , it emphasized that failure to adhere to future timelines would trigger severe legal consequences.
Urban Governance and Safety Mandates
The hearing highlighted pressing concerns in Gurugram, Jaipur, and Lucknow:
- Gurugram: Officials from the and the have been ordered to complete the demolition of unauthorized structures and clear all encroachments within two to four weeks.
- Jaipur: The Court voiced alarm over the "shocking" failure of the to prevent encroachments on surrendered land and the unauthorized conversion of residential and commercial spaces for use by coaching institutes, despite the availability of dedicated infrastructure.
- Lucknow: Addressing a recent tragedy in a commercial building, the Court ordered the submission of a report and issued a to the Vice-Chairman of the for failing to implement prior demolition orders.
The "Stray Animal" Directive
Beyond building regulations, the bench underscored the necessity of public safety. The Court ordered that all public areas throughout India must be kept free from stray animals, explicitly tasking local authorities with ensuring this mandate is achieved within four weeks.
Key Observations from the Bench
Highlighting the gravity of the situation, the Court remarked:
"If the same is true, the situation is not only shocking but also alarming."
The bench further stressed that public accountability must be absolute, noting:
"The Presiding Officer of the shall be personally responsible and accountable for any violation of this direction."
Regarding the protection of infrastructure meant for public use, the Court clarified:
"We make it clear that if any building has been specially earmarked and constructed for the purposes of relocating coaching institutes or other educational institutions, any allotment or settlement made in favour of any other person shall be subject to the final orders passed in these proceedings."
Legal Implications
The Supreme Court’s proactive stance reflects an effort to curb the culture of apathy in municipal administration. By requiring personal from heads of development authorities and imposing specific timelines for the disposal of pending appeals, the Court aims to bridge the gap between policy and practice. The proceedings are set to continue, with the Court maintaining a watchful eye on the implementation of these directives across the country.