judgement
Subject : Land Law - Land Acquisition
The case involved a long-standing dispute over the compensation granted to landowners in Village Chhalera Bangar, Tehsil Dadri, District Ghaziabad, whose land was acquired by the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) for planned industrial development. The acquisition process was initiated in 1991 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
The landowners argued that the compensation granted by the lower courts was inadequate and sought parity with the higher compensation of ₹449 per sq. yd. awarded in the
The Supreme Court acknowledged that the
The court found that the land had significant potential for commercial development, given its proximity to major roads, schools, and other landmarks. While the landowners' reliance on a single sale deed was insufficient, the court considered other evidence, such as lease deeds and circle rates, to arrive at a reasonable estimate.
The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeals and revised the rate of compensation to ₹403 per sq. yd. for the entire acquired land, except for the portion that was the subject of the
The enhanced compensation amount is to be deposited with the Reference Court within eight weeks and then disbursed to the claimants at the earliest.
#LandAcquisition #Compensation #NOIDA #SupremeCourtSupremeCourt
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.