Excise Policy Case
Subject : Criminal Law - Money Laundering
In a significant development, the Supreme Court on July 12 granted interim bail to Delhi Chief Minister
The three-judge bench, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and
Referral to Larger Bench
The court said the legal question regarding the "necessity to arrest" under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) needs to be considered by a larger bench of the top court.
Section 19 of the PMLA provides that if the ED, on the basis of material in its possession, has reason to believe that any person has been guilty of an offence punishable under the Act, it may arrest such person.
Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing
Singhvi contended that all the evidence cited by the ED predated July-August 2023 and was already part of the case against former Deputy Chief Minister
The senior counsel also argued that there should be a "necessity to arrest" as a precondition for arrest under Section 19 PMLA.
ED's Stance
Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, appearing for the ED, argued that the agency need not supply the incriminatory material it has against an accused at the time of arrest.
Raju contended that "the reason to believe (that an accused has committed an offence) is the material before him (ED officer)." He argued that in criminal law, the accused is not entitled to any copy before the chargesheet is filed, as otherwise, the evidence might be tampered with and witnesses threatened.
Despite the interim bail granted by the Supreme Court,
The Supreme Court's order underscored that
The legal battle surrounding the excise policy case and
interim bail - legal question - larger bench - money laundering - excise policy - arrest - evidence - necessity to arrest
#LegalUpdate #ExcisePolicyCase #ArvindKejriwal
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.