Back
Supreme Court Lists Plea Seeking Peaceful Protests at Jantar Mantar Against CEC Gyanesh Kumar
The on Monday agreed to list a seeking directions to the to permit peaceful protests at Jantar Mantar, the designated protest venue in the national capital. The plea comes against the backdrop of ongoing demonstrations against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, in which several political leaders, lawyers, students, and ordinary citizens have participated. A bench headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant will now examine the of the petition and whether similar matters are already pending before the court.
The petitioner, Priya Mishra, through her counsel, urged the court to intervene, arguing that the has been refusing to allow peaceful assemblies at Jantar Mantar despite the of the under . The matter is expected to be listed for in the coming days.
Background of the Agitation
The protests that prompted the plea are directed at Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, with demonstrators demanding action against him over alleged irregularities in the functioning of the . The agitation has drawn support from various quarters, including registered political parties, student unions, and civil society groups. In recent weeks, several peaceful marches and sit-ins were planned at Jantar Mantar, a traditional site for public demonstrations in Delhi. However, participants reported that the police either denied permission or dispersed gatherings on grounds of law and order.
The petitioner’s counsel highlighted that the restrictions are not limited to the anti-CEC protests but extend to students, citizens, office-bearers of registered political parties, and even Members of Parliament seeking to hold peaceful demonstrations. “ is not allowing peaceful protests. The issue is very important. Neither students nor citizens [are being allowed],” the counsel submitted before the bench.
Court Proceedings and Observations
When the plea was mentioned for urgent listing, Chief Justice Surya Kant sought clarification on the nature of the petition. “What is the relief sought? Who is the petitioner? Is it a PIL?” the CJI inquired. Upon being informed that the petitioner sought a direction to the to permit peaceful protests, the Chief Justice stated that the court would first ascertain whether any similar petitions were already pending. “If some similar matters are there, we will find out. We will only list it, then you argue,” he added.
The court thereafter agreed to list the matter for consideration. The case, registered as Priya Mishra v. Union of India (Diary No. 62121/2026), is now set to be taken up by the bench. The respondents include the Union of India, through the , and the .
Legal Framework:
The right to assemble peaceably and without arms is a under of the . However, it is subject to under , which allows the state to impose limitations in the interest of sovereignty and integrity of India, , or morality. The Supreme Court has consistently held that the right to protest is an essential feature of democracy, but it must be exercised peacefully and without causing public nuisance.
Jantar Mantar has historically been recognised as a designated protest site by the , and the has in several judgments directed the authorities to facilitate peaceful demonstrations there. The present plea argues that the to allow any protest at Jantar Mantar amounts to an of the . The petition also contends that the police’s actions violate the , as they have not shown any imminent threat to that would justify a complete ban.
Significance of the Supreme Court’s Intervention
The Supreme Court’s willingness to list the plea signals that the top court may be inclined to examine the broader issue of police restrictions on peaceful protests in the national capital. Legal experts note that this case could set a precedent for how authorities balance the right to protest with concerns. If the court issues allowing the petitioner and other groups to hold peaceful assemblies at Jantar Mantar, it could embolden other civil society groups to challenge similar restrictions across the country.
On the other hand, the court may also emphasise the need for protest organisers to comply with existing guidelines, such as obtaining prior permission and ensuring that gatherings remain non-violent. The outcome will likely reaffirm the constitutional balance between fundamental rights and state regulation.
Impact on Legal Practice and Civil Liberties
For legal practitioners, this case underscores the importance of the under of the Constitution for enforcing fundamental rights. The petition, filed as a PIL, allows any citizen to approach the Supreme Court directly when there is a widespread violation of rights. The court’s handling of the matter will also guide lower courts in similar cases involving police permissions for demonstrations.
Civil liberties organisations are closely watching the proceedings. They argue that the right to protest is the bedrock of and that any excessive restrictions must be judicially reviewed. The case also highlights the role of the Election Commission as an institution, with the protests against the CEC raising questions about the independence and transparency of the electoral body.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s decision to list the plea seeking permission for peaceful protests at Jantar Mantar is a significant development for the right to assembly in India. As the court examines whether similar petitions are pending and assesses the merits of the case, it will have the opportunity to clarify the scope of in the context of modern policing and . For now, the petitioner and the wider public await the next hearing, hopeful that the court will reaffirm the democratic space for peaceful dissent.
The matter is likely to be heard in the coming weeks, with both sides expected to present arguments on the constitutional imperative of permitting peaceful protests versus the state’s duty to maintain . The legal community will be watching closely for any that may shape the future of protest rights in Delhi.
