The Supreme Court of India has constituted a Standing Committee on Judicial Well-being, marking a significant institutional move to address the physical and mental health challenges faced by judicial officers across the country. Announced on October 10, coinciding with World Mental Health Day, the committee is chaired by Supreme Court Judge Justice K.V. Viswanathan and includes four other members with expertise in psychiatry, psychology, law, and judicial administration.

The initiative signals a recognition that the well-being of judges is directly linked to the efficiency and sustainability of the justice delivery system. According to an official press release, the committee is intended to “provide a structured institutional mechanism for identifying and addressing issues affecting the professional and personal well-being of judicial officers.”

Composition and Expertise of the Committee

The five-member committee brings together diverse professional backgrounds. Apart from Justice Viswanathan, the members are Dr. Savita Malhotra, former Dean of PGIMER Chandigarh and Professor & Head of the Department of Psychiatry; Rajat Mitra, a psychologist and Director and Co-founder of the Swanchetan Society for Mental Health; Mrinal Kanwar, an Advocate-on-Record in the Supreme Court; and Aarti Singh, Registrar (Judicial) at the Centre for Research and Planning of the Supreme Court.

This mix of judicial, medical, psychological, and administrative expertise is expected to enable the committee to examine the multifaceted challenges that judicial officers face in their daily work.

Evidence-Based Foundation from District Judiciary Study

The committee’s constitution follows empirical research conducted by the Supreme Court’s Centre for Research and Planning, which examined the working conditions and well-being of officers serving in the District Judiciary. The study covered occupational stress, workload, mental and physical exhaustion, staffing shortages, infrastructural limitations, administrative responsibilities, transfers, work-life balance, and the availability of institutional support.

The press release described the findings as “an important foundation for developing evidence-based institutional measures to address these challenges.” The research underscores that judicial officers “discharge their responsibilities under demanding circumstances, often involving heavy caseloads, prolonged working hours, complex decision-making, administrative pressures and exposure to emotionally challenging and sensitive cases.”

Mandate to Move Beyond Isolated Interventions

The Standing Committee is designed to function as a continuing institutional platform rather than a one-time intervention. Its responsibilities include identifying areas requiring institutional intervention, facilitating coordination on welfare measures, developing appropriate guidance, and periodically reviewing initiatives undertaken to support judicial officers.

The stated objective, as per the release, is “to move beyond isolated interventions and establish a sustained framework for promoting judicial well-being across the judicial system.” This approach reflects an understanding that the well-being of judges is not merely a matter of individual welfare but is “closely connected with the efficiency, quality and sustainability of the administration of justice.”

International Context and Recognition

The Supreme Court placed its initiative within a wider international framework, drawing on the Nauru Declaration on Judicial Well-being adopted on July 25, 2024. That declaration emphasises the need for systemic, evidence-based measures to safeguard the physical and mental health of judges. The initiative also aligns with the United Nations General Assembly’s proclamation in March 2025 of July 25 as the International Day for Judicial Well-being, which recognises the vital relationship between judges’ well-being and the effective administration of justice.

By establishing this committee, the Supreme Court seeks to promote a healthier and more supportive working environment for judicial officers. The committee will examine both existing and emerging challenges, and its work is expected to contribute to the long-term sustainability of the judicial system. The next steps will involve the committee convening to outline its work plan and begin identifying priority areas for institutional intervention.