Supreme Court Orders Integration of Digital Portals to Curb Fake Motor Accident Claims

The Supreme Court of India has taken a decisive step to combat fraudulent motor accident claims by ordering the mandatory integration of key digital platforms within four weeks. A bench of Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice Prasanna B. Varale directed the Union government, states, and union territories to interconnect the Electronic Detailed Accident Report (eDAR) portal with VAHAN, SARATHI, and the Insurance Information Bureau (IIB) for seamless data sharing on accidents, vehicles, and insurance histories.

The order came during proceedings in a Special Leave Petition filed by The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. against Tuni Pati and others, which began as a compensation dispute but widened into a probe into suspected fake claims after an insured vehicle was found to be involved in multiple accidents.

Digital Integration Mandate

The Court noted that while the eDAR portal, operated by the National Informatics Centre, had been established, only a few states were uploading data. It directed all states to ensure prompt uploading and ordered the integration to extend to the Hit-and-Run and PM-RAHAT Schemes, enabling early accident alerts to insurers. The Court observed:

"A direction is issued to all the concerned authorities, including the Union of India and States to ensure interlinking of VAHAN, SARATHI, eDAR and IIB for seamless cross-reference of accident reports, vehicle/insurer records and prior claim(s) history. This integration shall extend to Hit-and-Run and PM-RAHAT Schemes, enabling early accident alerts directly to insurers. The same be done within four weeks from today positively."

Contempt Proceedings Against Insurance Heads

The Court expressed strong displeasure over repeated failures by several insurance companies to comply with earlier orders requiring personal appearance. Contempt notices were issued to the managing directors or CEOs of multiple firms.

The most notable instance involved Vaibhav Goyal, Managing Director and CEO of Navi General Insurance Limited. The Court rejected his apology, calling it "cosmetic" after he characterized the lapse as a "bona fide error" without having taken action against the responsible employee. The Court stated:

"We note that apology has been tendered in the affidavit but we outright reject the said apology as it is only cosmetic and not heartfelt... conduct speaks for itself."

Contempt notices were also issued against Kotak Mahindra Life Insurance, Credit Access Life Insurance, Zurich Kotak General Insurance, New India Assurance, Zuno General Insurance, Aditya Birla Health Insurance, and General Insurance Corporation of India (GIC Re) for non-appearance.

Genuine Explanations Accepted

The Court accepted explanations where it found bona fide reasons. The absence of Parag Ved, CEO of Liberty General Insurance, due to a missed flight was accepted, closing the contempt issue. Similarly, explanations from Kiwi General Insurance and Valueattics Reinsurance were accepted.

However, the Court took strong exception to the affidavit of Shubhdarshini Ghosh, MD of Zuno General Insurance, who justified her absence citing pre-scheduled meetings. The Court remarked:

"if the CEO is unaware of what is happening in his company, that too in a matter where there is an order of this Court, we find there has been total casualness and lack of responsibility shown."

She was granted an opportunity to file a fresh affidavit but directed to appear personally on the next date.

Implications and Next Steps

The integration of digital portals is expected to significantly reduce fraudulent claims by enabling real-time data sharing among transport authorities, accident reporting agencies, and insurers. The Court also directed states to constitute Special Investigation Teams as per earlier orders within four weeks.

Senior advocate Ranjit Kumar was requested to assist the Court on the principal issue. The matter is listed for further hearing on November 27, 2026, at 2:00 PM.

This judgment underscores the judiciary's commitment to leveraging technology for transparency in motor accident claims while enforcing strict compliance with court orders through contempt proceedings.