judgement
Subject : - Inheritance and Succession
In this case, the plaintiff, who is the widow of the deceased
The defendants argued that the plaintiff had agreed to the sale of the property to the 5th defendant and that she had no preferential right under the Hindu Succession Act. The plaintiff, on the other hand, contended that she has the right to purchase the shares of the other co-heirs under Section 22(1) of the Act.
The court examined the provisions of Section 22(1) of the Hindu Succession Act and the relevant case law. It found that the classification of heirs specified in Class I of the Schedule to the Act as a class for the purpose of granting preferential right of purchase is a reasonable one, similar to the court's reasoning in upholding the pre-emption rights of co-sharers in the Atam Prakash case.
The court also held that in a suit for pre-emption under Section 22(1), the invalidity of the sale already effected by the co-heirs can be considered and decided as an incidental matter, without the need for a separate prayer for declaration or setting aside the sale deed.
The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the first appellate court, which had allowed the plaintiff's claim for pre-emption under Section 22(1) of the Hindu Succession Act. However, the court directed the plaintiff to deposit an additional sum of ₹25,000 as part of the consideration payable to the other co-heirs, in line with the principles laid down in the Govindan Nair case.
#HinduSuccessionAct #PreemptionRights #CoHeirs
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Ex-Parte Order Without Notice or Jurisdiction Constitutes 'Gross Abuse of Process': Rajasthan High Court
15 Jun 2026
Mandatory Administrative Enquiry Precedes FIR Against Public Servants Under SC/ST Act: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Assigning Administrative Charges to Tainted Officials Violates Natural Justice: MP High Court Quashes PWD Order
16 Jun 2026
Outsourced Employees Lack Right to Promotion; Unauthorized Designation Upgrades Are Legally Void: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Calcutta HC Questions Speaker’s Power to Appoint LoP
16 Jun 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.