SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon

Supreme Court Weekly Digest

2025-11-24

Subject:

AI Assistant icon
Supreme Court Weekly Digest

Supreme Today News Desk

Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1958
Supreme Court (54)

P. U. Sidhique VS Zakariya

(1) Interpretation of Statute – Courts must balance textual fidelity with interpretive wisdom, ensuring that laws are not applied mechanically without considering context or equity; but serve as true ....

Headnote:

(A) Interpretation of Statute – While it is not for Courts to reject or refuse to give effect to legislation merely on the grounds that clear meaning of legislation appears absurd to Judiciary, when forced to construe a provision, meaning of which is open to question they will lean against any construction that would produce a result which appears to them to be absurd or unjust – The more absurd a...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1951

Bharat Kantilal Dalal (Dead) Through Lr. VS Chetan Surendra Dalal

(1) Execution of decree – Requirement of notice under Order 21 Rule 22 (1) to persons enumerated therein is not a mere procedural courtesy but is very foundation of jurisdiction when execution is soug....

Headnote:

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order 21 Rules 22 and 23 – Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 34 – Execution of decree – Show-cause notice – Requirement of notice under Order 21 Rule 22 (1) to persons enumerated therein is not a mere procedural courtesy but is very foundation of jurisdiction when execution is sought against estate of deceased judgment debtor – Act is a self-contained Co...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1946

Rajeswari VS Shanmugam

(1) Agreement to sell – Deed assigning decree for specific performance of immovable property do not require registration.
(2) With passing of decree of specific performance, contract between partie....

Headnote:

Registration Act, 1908 – Section 17(1)(e) – Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Section 28 – Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order 21 Rule 16 – Agreement to sell – Requirement of registration of deed assigning decree for specific performance of immovable property – Neither agreement of sale nor a decree passed on the basis of specific performance of contract gives any right or title to decree holder and righ...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1948

Talli Gram Panchayat VS Union Of India

Subject: Environmental Law – Appeals and Limitations

Keywords: environment clearance, limitation period, communication, National Green Tribunal, public access, duty bearers, appeal, regulatory compliance, environmental law, legal rights

The commencement of the limitation period for appeals regarding environmental clearances is triggered by the earliest effective communication to an aggrieved person by any duty bearer.

Headnote:

(A) National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 - Section 16(h) - Limitation period for appeals - The date of communication of environmental clearance to any aggrieved person is relevant for calculating the limitation period for filing appeals under the Act, which commences from the earliest date of communication by any duty bearers. (Paras 1, 3, 6, 8, 16) (B) Environmental Law - Communication obligation - ...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1944

Sri Lakshmi Hotel Pvt. Ltd. vs Sriram City Union Finance Ltd.

Arbitration – Grant of post-award interest under Section 31(7)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is mandatory – Only discretion which Arbitral Tribunal has is to decide rate of interest to ....

Headnote:

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Sections 34 and 37(1) – Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Section 7 – Usurious Loans Act, 1918 – Section 3 – Appeal against arbitral award – Grant of post-award interest under Section 31(7)(b) is mandatory – Only discretion which Arbitral Tribunal has is to decide rate of interest to be awarded – Where Arbitrator does not fix any rate of interest, then...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1940

Prashant Prakash Ratnaparki VS State of Maharashtra

Subject: Criminal Law – Appeals and Quashing of FIR

Keywords: quashing, dacoity, compromise, dishonest intention, FIR, legal settlement, institutional theft, judicial review, amicable resolution, Supreme Court

FIR cannot be quashed in piecemeal.

Headnote:

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 – Sections 115(2), 310, 351(2), 351(3) and 352 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – Section 528 – Constitution of India – Article 142 – Hurt, criminal intimidation, insult and robbery – FIR – Matter was settled amicably between accused and complainant – FIR was initially registered against unknown persons – Alleged acts appear to have arisen out of a dispute c...


Supreme(SC) 2025 0 1939

Raj Kumar @ Bheema VS State of NCT of Delhi

Subject: Criminal Law – Murder

Keywords: identification, eyewitness, acquitted, evidence, recovery, testimonial inconsistencies, MCOCA, IPC, conviction, justice

Identification of the accused after a long delay, coupled with material inconsistencies in witness testimony, undermines evidential reliability; absence of corroborating evidence leads to an acquittal....

Headnote:

(A) Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 3, 3(1)(i), 3(1)(ii), 3(2), 3(4) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 396, 302, 307, 397, 412 read with Section 34 - Conviction under Section 302 IPC affirmed by High Court - Appeal allowed, acquitting the accused-appellant due to unreliable identification and lack of substantive evidence linking him to the crime. (Paras 70, 71, 72) (...


Breaking News

View All
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top