J. B. PARDIWALA, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Sri Lakshmi Hotel Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sriram City Union Finance Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.B. PARDIWALA, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal arises from the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 07.01.2020 by which the original side appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short “the Act 1996”) filed by the appellants herein being O.S.A. No. 202 of 2019 came to be dismissed thereby affirming the order passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing O.P. No. 137 of 2015 preferred by the appellants under Section 34 of the Act, 1996, seeking to challenge the arbitral award.
A. FACTUAL MATRIX
3. Appellant no. 1, viz. M/s Sri Lakshmi Hotels Pvt. Limited, is a Private Limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. Appellant no. 2 viz. V.S. Palanivel is the Managing Director of appellant no. 1. Respondent no. 1 viz. Sriram City Union Finance Ltd. is a Non-Banking Financial Company (for short “the NBFC”). Respondent no. 2 viz. Mr. K. Balasubramanian is a retired District Judge who was appointed as the arbitrator and who had passed the arbitral award.
4. Appellant no. 1 through appellant no. 2 had availed a loan facility amounting to INR 1,50,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore an
Central Bank of India vs. Ravindra and Others
Sardar Associates vs. Punjab and Sindh Bank
Nedumpilli Finance Company Limited vs. State of Kerala
R.P. Garg vs. The General Manager, Telecom Department and Others
Morgan Securities & Credits Pvt. Ltd. vs. Videocon Industries Ltd.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. S.A. Builders Ltd.
Morgan Securities & Credits (P) Ltd. vs. Videocon Industries Ltd.
State of Rajasthan and Another vs. Ferro Concrete Construction Private Limited
Irrigation Deptt. Govt. of Orissa vs. G.C. Roy
Dhenkanal Minor Irrigation Division vs. N.C. Budharaj
Bhagawati Oxygen Ltd. vs. Hindustan Copper Ltd.
Hyder Consulting (UK) Ltd. vs. State of Orissa
Swan Gold Mining Ltd. vs. Hindustan Copper Ltd.
P.R. Shah, Shares & Stock Brokers (P) Ltd. vs. B.H.H. Securities (P) Ltd.
Ssangyong Engg. & Construction Co. Ltd. vs. NHAI
PSA Sical Terminals (P) Ltd. vs. V.O. Chidambranar Port Trust Tuticorin and Others
OPG Power Generation Private Limited vs. Enexio Power Cooling Solutions India Private Limited
Gherulal Parakh vs. Mahadeodas Maiya
Central Inland Water Transport Corporation vs. Brojo Nath Ganguly
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.