Court Decision
Subject : Mineral Law - Quarry Lease
In a recent ruling, the Gujarat High Court addressed a petition concerning the quarry lease of a petitioner located at the bank of the Narmada River in Sisodara village. The petitioner sought directions to prevent the closure of their online royalty account and to declare that their lease should be extended until March 31, 2025, under the Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules of 2017.
The petitioner, represented by Senior Counsel Mr. M.R. Bhatt, argued that the delay in executing the lease deed was due to the authorities' inaction and that the lease should be deemed extended as per the rules. Conversely, the Assistant Government Pleader, Ms. Foram Trivedi, contended that the new rules enacted in 2017 rendered the petitioner's application ineligible for extension, as the lease was executed after the new regulations came into force.
The court analyzed the timeline of events, noting that the application for the quarry lease was initially filed in 2010 but faced multiple rejections and delays. The court emphasized that the new Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules of 2017, which came into effect on May 24, 2017, established a new framework for quarry leases, including a maximum duration of five years for leases executed after this date. The court referenced previous judgments that clarified that only leases granted or renewed before the new rules could be extended under the provisions of Rule 12.
Ultimately, the court dismissed the petition, affirming that the petitioner could not claim an extension of the quarry lease beyond the stipulated period as per the new rules. The ruling underscores the importance of adhering to the current legal framework governing mineral leases and the implications of regulatory changes on existing applications.
#MineralLaw #QuarryLease #GujaratRules #GujaratHighCourt
Accommodation Requests Do Not Constitute Mala Fide Transfers: MP High Court Upholds Government Authority
23 Jun 2026
Denial of 7th Pay Commission to NHM Employees Despite Approved Service Bye-laws is Arbitrary: Punjab & Haryana High Court
23 Jun 2026
Arbitrary Termination of Long-Term Workers Illegal: Orissa HC
29 Jun 2026
POCSO Court Awards Death Penalty to 65-Year-Old Convict
30 Jun 2026
Senior Citizens Act Cannot Be Invoked for Title Disputes Unless Section 23 Applies: Allahabad High Court
04 Jul 2026
Vague And Nebulous Allegations Do Not Warrant Judicial Interference In Policy Matters: Patna High Court
04 Jul 2026
12-Year Possession Mandatory To Resist Land Eviction: Jharkhand HC
04 Jul 2026
Allahabad High Court Refuses To Quash Statewide ATS Probe Into Funding Of 4,000 Unaided Madrassas
04 Jul 2026
Advocates Have No Right to Demand Out-Of-Turn Listing of Cases: Madras High Court
07 Jul 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.