Court Decision
2024-12-04
Subject: Mineral Law - Quarry Lease
In a recent ruling, the Gujarat High Court addressed a petition concerning the quarry lease of a petitioner located at the bank of the Narmada River in Sisodara village. The petitioner sought directions to prevent the closure of their online royalty account and to declare that their lease should be extended until March 31, 2025, under the Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules of 2017.
The petitioner, represented by Senior Counsel Mr. M.R. Bhatt, argued that the delay in executing the lease deed was due to the authorities' inaction and that the lease should be deemed extended as per the rules. Conversely, the Assistant Government Pleader, Ms. Foram Trivedi, contended that the new rules enacted in 2017 rendered the petitioner's application ineligible for extension, as the lease was executed after the new regulations came into force.
The court analyzed the timeline of events, noting that the application for the quarry lease was initially filed in 2010 but faced multiple rejections and delays. The court emphasized that the new Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules of 2017, which came into effect on May 24, 2017, established a new framework for quarry leases, including a maximum duration of five years for leases executed after this date. The court referenced previous judgments that clarified that only leases granted or renewed before the new rules could be extended under the provisions of Rule 12.
Ultimately, the court dismissed the petition, affirming that the petitioner could not claim an extension of the quarry lease beyond the stipulated period as per the new rules. The ruling underscores the importance of adhering to the current legal framework governing mineral leases and the implications of regulatory changes on existing applications.
#MineralLaw #QuarryLease #GujaratRules #GujaratHighCourt
Mechanical Issuance of LOCs in Section 498A BNS Cases Illegal Without Evasion or Grave Offence: Andhra Pradesh HC
17 Feb 2026
Mere Possession Of Bank's Stationery Without Proof Of Prejudice Not Misconduct: Calcutta High Court
17 Feb 2026
Contradictory Testimonies of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration Warrant Acquittal Under Sections 147, 304 Part-I/149 IPC: Calcutta High Court
17 Feb 2026
Absconding Accused Not Entitled To Anticipatory Bail On Co-Accused Acquittal Alone: Supreme Court
17 Feb 2026
Supreme Court Seeks Affidavit on TET for Secondary Special Educators
17 Feb 2026
Unproven Accusations of Wife's Extramarital Affair Amount to Mental Cruelty, Justifying Separation: Karnataka HC Denies Divorce on Desertion
17 Feb 2026
Flight Risk and Economic Interests Justify LOC Even Pre-Prosecution in Corporate Fraud: Calcutta High Court
17 Feb 2026
Only Enrolled Advocates Can Practice Before Tribunals: BCI and Tax Lawyers Argue in Delhi High Court
17 Feb 2026
Delhi HC Directs Joint Meeting Between DCGI & Legal Metrology on Mandatory Veg/Non-Veg Dots for Cosmetics: Rule 6(8) Legal Metrology Rules
17 Feb 2026
Only existing quarry leases prior to the commencement of the Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017 are eligible for extension under the specified provisions.
Only existing quarry leases granted before the Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017, can be extended under Rule 12, affecting the petitioner's claim.
Only quarry leases granted or renewed before the commencement of the Gujarat Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 2017 are eligible for extension under Rule 12.
The lease granted in 1999 was a renewal and not a fresh lease. The automatic extension provision in the amended rules did not apply to cases where the lease had been renewed prior to the amendment.
Compliance with statutory provisions is crucial; failure to commence operations within specified periods renders lease applications void.
The importance of the government making a written order granting quarry lease and the completion of pending formalities by the petitioner.
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.