SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next

Court Decision

The court ruled that the provisions of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 12 of the Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017 apply only to quarry leases that were granted and in currency before the commencement of the Rules, thus rejecting the petitioner's claim for an extension of the lease period. - 2024-09-09

Subject : Mineral Law - Quarry Lease Regulations

The court ruled that the provisions of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 12 of the Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017 apply only to quarry leases that were granted and in currency before the commencement of the Rules, thus rejecting the petitioner's claim for an extension of the lease period.

Supreme Today News Desk

Court Dismisses Petition for Extension of Quarry Lease in Gujarat

Background

In a significant ruling, the Gujarat High Court addressed a petition concerning the extension of a quarry lease for Minor Mineral Ordinary Clay. The petitioner, represented by advocate Shivgar P. Gosai , sought directions for the continuation of online royalty passes and a declaration that their lease, granted by the District Collector in 2018, should be extended until March 31, 2025, under the Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017.

Arguments

The petitioner argued that all necessary approvals, including environmental clearance and a sanctioned mining plan, had been obtained, and thus the lease should be deemed extended as per the relevant rules. Conversely, the respondent authorities had ceased the issuance of online royalty passes, prompting the petitioner to seek judicial intervention.

Court's Analysis and Reasoning

The court examined the provisions of the Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules, particularly Rule 12 and Rule 29. It noted that the extension of quarry leases under clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 12 applies only to leases that were granted and in currency before the rules came into effect on May 24, 2017. The court referenced a previous case, Shree Dhara Minerals and Mines vs. State of Gujarat , which established that only existing leases could benefit from the extension provisions. The court emphasized that the petitioner's lease did not meet these criteria, as it was not in currency prior to the rules' commencement.

Decision

Ultimately, the court dismissed the petition, affirming that the discontinuation of the online royalty passes was justified. The ruling underscores the importance of adhering to the statutory framework established by the Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017, and clarifies the conditions under which quarry leases may be extended. The decision has significant implications for existing and prospective quarry leaseholders in Gujarat, reinforcing the need for compliance with the current legal provisions governing mineral extraction.

#MineralLaw #GujaratRules #QuarryLease #GujaratHighCourt

Breaking News

View All
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top