Court Decision
Subject : Mineral Law - Quarry Lease Regulations
In a significant ruling, the Gujarat High Court addressed a petition concerning the extension of a quarry lease for Minor Mineral Ordinary Clay. The petitioner, represented by advocate
The petitioner argued that all necessary approvals, including environmental clearance and a sanctioned mining plan, had been obtained, and thus the lease should be deemed extended as per the relevant rules. Conversely, the respondent authorities had ceased the issuance of online royalty passes, prompting the petitioner to seek judicial intervention.
The court examined the provisions of the Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules, particularly Rule 12 and Rule 29. It noted that the extension of quarry leases under clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 12 applies only to leases that were granted and in currency before the rules came into effect on May 24, 2017. The court referenced a previous case, Shree Dhara Minerals and Mines vs. State of Gujarat , which established that only existing leases could benefit from the extension provisions. The court emphasized that the petitioner's lease did not meet these criteria, as it was not in currency prior to the rules' commencement.
Ultimately, the court dismissed the petition, affirming that the discontinuation of the online royalty passes was justified. The ruling underscores the importance of adhering to the statutory framework established by the Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017, and clarifies the conditions under which quarry leases may be extended. The decision has significant implications for existing and prospective quarry leaseholders in Gujarat, reinforcing the need for compliance with the current legal provisions governing mineral extraction.
#MineralLaw #GujaratRules #QuarryLease #GujaratHighCourt
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.