Court Decision
Subject : Mineral Law - Quarry Lease Regulations
In a significant ruling, the Gujarat High Court addressed a petition concerning the extension of a quarry lease for Minor Mineral Ordinary Clay. The petitioner, represented by advocate
The petitioner argued that all necessary approvals, including environmental clearance and a sanctioned mining plan, had been obtained, and thus the lease should be deemed extended as per the relevant rules. Conversely, the respondent authorities had ceased the issuance of online royalty passes, prompting the petitioner to seek judicial intervention.
The court examined the provisions of the Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules, particularly Rule 12 and Rule 29. It noted that the extension of quarry leases under clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 12 applies only to leases that were granted and in currency before the rules came into effect on May 24, 2017. The court referenced a previous case, Shree Dhara Minerals and Mines vs. State of Gujarat , which established that only existing leases could benefit from the extension provisions. The court emphasized that the petitioner's lease did not meet these criteria, as it was not in currency prior to the rules' commencement.
Ultimately, the court dismissed the petition, affirming that the discontinuation of the online royalty passes was justified. The ruling underscores the importance of adhering to the statutory framework established by the Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017, and clarifies the conditions under which quarry leases may be extended. The decision has significant implications for existing and prospective quarry leaseholders in Gujarat, reinforcing the need for compliance with the current legal provisions governing mineral extraction.
#MineralLaw #GujaratRules #QuarryLease #GujaratHighCourt
Ponraj Challenges FIR Over Alleged Defamatory Political Remarks
16 Jun 2026
Outsourced Employees Lack Right to Promotion; Unauthorized Designation Upgrades Are Legally Void: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Assigning Administrative Charges to Tainted Officials Violates Natural Justice: MP High Court Quashes PWD Order
16 Jun 2026
SC Rules Walking on Footpaths is Fundamental Right
19 Jun 2026
Senior Citizens Act Cannot Be Invoked for Title Disputes Unless Section 23 Applies: Allahabad High Court
04 Jul 2026
Vague And Nebulous Allegations Do Not Warrant Judicial Interference In Policy Matters: Patna High Court
04 Jul 2026
12-Year Possession Mandatory To Resist Land Eviction: Jharkhand HC
04 Jul 2026
Advocates Have No Right to Demand Out-Of-Turn Listing of Cases: Madras High Court
07 Jul 2026
Delhi High Court Examines Personality Rights in Cricket Lawsuit
07 Jul 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.