Back
judgement
Subject : Administrative Law - Street Vending Regulation
Background
A writ petition was filed by a street vendor seeking to quash a notice issued by the Thrissur Corporation and to direct the corporation to implement the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014.
Legal Question
The legal question before the court was whether the Thrissur Corporation had failed to implement the Street Vendors Act and whether the petitioner was entitled to the reliefs sought.
Arguments Presented
Petitioner: The petitioner argued that the corporation had failed to implement the Street Vendors Act and that the notice issued to him was illegal. He also argued that he was entitled to a license to continue street vending.
Corporation: The corporation argued that it had published a list of street vendors on 22.12.2021 and that the petitioner was not included in the list. The corporation also argued that the petitioner was not continuing with the shop.
Court's Analysis and Reasoning
The court noted that the corporation had submitted that the petitioner was not included in the list of street vendors published on 22.12.2021 and was not continuing with the shop. The court held that if this was the case, nothing survived in the case.
Decision
The court dismissed the writ petition.
Significance
This case highlights the importance of implementing the Street Vendors Act and ensuring that street vendors are given the necessary licenses to continue their livelihood.
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
