Withdrawal of Twin Girl Admission Benefit in Kendriya Vidyalayas Valid: Kerala High Court

In a significant ruling regarding education policy, the Kerala High Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging the withdrawal of the special admission quota for twin girl children in Kendriya Vidyalayas (KV). Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas held that the previous concession, which allowed for the admission of twin girls over and above the sanctioned class capacity, was a temporary privilege that had been revoked in the 2022-23 academic year and did not constitute a permanent legal right .

Case Background The petition was filed by Rajesh R., an Indian Railways employee, on behalf of his six-year-old daughter, seeking admission to the PM SHRI Kendriya Vidyalaya in Kollam. The petitioner’s twin daughters had applied for admission under Category I for the 2026-27 academic year. While one daughter secured admission based on merit, the second twin was placed 16th on the waiting list.

The petitioner argued that separating the twins would cause emotional distress and cited the spirit of the 'Beti Bachao Beti Padhao' scheme, contending that the policy of treating twins as a single admission unit should be restored as a matter of gender justice.

Arguments Presented The counsel for the petitioner emphasized the strong emotional bond between the twins, asserting that their separation would be contrary to their well-being. They further argued that the withdrawal of the benefit was arbitrary and violated Article 14 of the Constitution by failing to maintain a practice previously established to promote girl child education.

Conversely, the respondents ( Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan ) maintained that admissions are strictly governed by centrally notified guidelines established to ensure transparency and uniformity. They clarified that the specific quota for twin girls was a policy decision that ceased to exist after the 2022-23 session. The school argued that any departure from the current guidelines would undermine the integrity of the selection process and unfairly prejudice other candidates who had followed the prescribed rules.

Legal Analysis The Court focused on the distinction between a "privilege" and a "right." Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas observed that admission guidelines for the 2025-26 and 2026-27 sessions explicitly omitted the previous provision for twin girl children. Since the petitioners were aware of the current guidelines at the time of application, the Court rejected the plea of " legitimate expectation ."

Citing the precedent in Ayurveda Shastri Seva Mandal v. Union of India , the Court reiterated that privileges granted for educational concessions cannot be transformed into enforceable legal rights. Furthermore, the Court noted that KVs act as national institutions that must adhere to uniform standards to maintain teacher-student ratios and class capacity.

Key Observations

* "The challenge against its discontinuation has no merits. What was in existence was only a privilege given to twin girl children and not a right. Privileges conferred can be withdrawn at any time."

* "Kendriya Vidyalayas cater to numerous students across the country and are hence obligated to adhere strictly to uniform admission norms."

* "In the absence of any stipulation in the Guidelines for 2025-26 , there is no reason to assume that petitioners expected a concession for twin girl children to be granted."

Court's Decision The Kerala High Court concluded that in the absence of an enabling provision under the current admission guidelines, the Court could not grant special, discretionary relief to the second petitioner. The Court maintained that forcing the school to bypass the waiting list would negatively impact the fairness of the admissions process for all participants. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, reinforcing the importance of strictly adhering to published administrative policy in competitive school admissions.