Breaking News
Punjab Minister Arora Challenges ED PMLA Arrest in High Court
12 May 2026
No Mens Rea or Builder Role for Financier in Quake Collapse: Gujarat HC Allows Discharge under Section 227 CrPC
12 May 2026
Wife's Education Or Capacity To Earn No Bar To Maintenance U/S 125 CrPC: Allahabad HC
12 May 2026
Implying Bail Denial Due to Junior Counsel Status Deemed Derogatory to Court Dignity: Madhya Pradesh HC
12 May 2026
Child Tried as Adult Can't Get Fixed 10-Year Sentence for Murder u/s 302 IPC: P&H HC
12 May 2026
Quo Warranto Inapplicable to Corruption Claims Without Eligibility Deficiency: Punjab & Haryana HC
12 May 2026
Public Parading of Accused Not Proven as Mala Fide Article 21 Violation Without Evidence: Madhya Pradesh HC Orders Inquiry
12 May 2026
Karnataka HC Permits DNA Officials Brazil Travel
12 May 2026
Questioning Husband's Manhood or Refusing Matrimonial Ties Doesn't Constitute Abetment to Suicide u/s 306 IPC: Calcutta High Court
12 May 2026
Search Results for "Tribunal News | Supremetoday AI"
Bank Liable for Deficiency in Service for Releasing Loan Payment to Dealer Without Verifying Delivery of Goods to Borrower: State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
ConsumerProtection BankingLaw DeficiencyInService
Bank and Dealer Held Jointly Liable for Non-Delivery of Farm Equipment After Sanctioning Loan Bhopal, MP– The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has ruled that a bank commits a "deficiency in service" when it releases the full loan amount to a supplier without physically verifying t...
Corporate Agent Bank Liable for Not Submitting Proposal Forms, Not Insurer: Odisha State Consumer Commission
#ConsumerProtection #InsuranceLaw #CorporateAgent
Bank Found Deficient in Service for Failing to Forward Insurance Proposals, Not LIC: Odisha Consumer Commission Cuttack, Odisha- The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Odisha, has ruled that a bank acting as a corporate agent for an insurance company is liable for deficiency in ser...
Beneficiaries Of Govt. Welfare Schemes Are 'Consumers' Under Consumer Protection Act: Gujarat State Commission
#ConsumerProtection #InsuranceLaw #WelfareSchemes
Beneficiaries of Government Welfare Schemes Are ‘Consumers,’ Entitled to Sue Under Consumer Act: Gujarat State Commission Upholds Award AHMEDABAD– In a significant ruling reinforcing the rights of citizens under government welfare schemes, the Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commiss...
No Cure Is Not Negligence; Doctor Not Liable if Standard Medical Protocol Followed For Critically Ill Patient: Punjab SCDRC
#MedicalNegligence #ConsumerProtectionAct #StandardOfCare
Punjab State Commission Overturns Medical Negligence Ruling, Exonerates Doctor and Hospital Chandigarh, Punjab- The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC), Punjab, has set aside a District Commission order, ruling that a doctor and hospital cannot be held liable for medical negl...
Breach of Policy Condition Not Germane in Vehicle Theft Cases; Insurer Must Pay Claim: Rajasthan State Consumer Commission
#InsuranceLaw #ConsumerProtection #VehicleTheftClaim
Insurer Cannot Deny Theft Claim Based on Unlicensed Driver, Rules Rajasthan Consumer Commission Jaipur, Rajasthan– The Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has delivered a significant ruling, holding that an insurance company cannot repudiate a vehicle theft claim on the gro...
Financier Society Held Liable for 'Unfair Trade Practice' for Failing to Verify Tractor Purchase under Govt Scheme: MP State Consumer Commission
ConsumerProtection UnfairTradePractice ConsumerRights
Financier Equally Liable for Failing to Verify Tractor Sale Under Govt Scheme, Rules MP State Consumer Commission Bhopal, MP- The Madhya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has held a cooperative financing society liable for 'deficiency in service' and 'unfair trade practice'...
Builder Liable for 2001 Earthquake Building Collapse; Limitation Period Starts from Date of Injury, Not Possession: Gujarat State Consumer Commission
ConsumerProtection BuilderLiability RealEstateLaw
Builder Held Liable for 2001 Gujarat Earthquake Collapse, Ordered to Compensate Homeowners AHMEDABAD:In a significant verdict providing relief to victims of the 2001 Gujarat earthquake, the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has held M/s. Akshar Associates and its engineers jointly ...
Limitation Period For Latent Construction Defects Begins When Defect Surfaces, Not At Possession: Gujarat State Consumer Commission
ConsumerProtection RealEstateLaw LatentDefect
Akshardeep Apartment Collapse: After 21 Years, Gujarat Consumer Commission Holds Builder and Engineers Liable for "Deficiency in Service" Ahmedabad, Gujarat– In a significant verdict delivered over two decades after the tragic 2001 Gujarat earthquake, the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Com...
Builder & Engineers Liable for 2001 Earthquake Collapse; Cause of Action Starts from Injury Date, Not Possession: Gujarat Consumer Commission
#ConsumerProtection #BuildingCollapse #RealEstateLaw
Builder and Engineers Held Liable for 2001 Gujarat Earthquake Building Collapse, Ordered to Pay ₹39.61 Lakh Compensation Ahmedabad, Gujarat- More than two decades after the tragic collapse of the Akshardeep Apartments during the 2001 Gujarat earthquake, the State Consumer Disputes Redressal C...
Latent Construction Defect Surfacing in Earthquake Gives Rise to Fresh Cause of Action; Complaint Not Time-Barred: Gujarat State Consumer Commission
ConsumerProtection RealEstateLaw BuildingCollapse
Gujarat Consumer Commission Awards ₹39.61 Lakh to Owners of Apartments That Collapsed in 2001 Earthquake, Citing Builder Negligence AHMEDABAD:Two decades after their homes were reduced to rubble in the devastating 2001 Gujarat earthquake, several flat owners of the Akshardeep Apartments have ...
