TARUN CHATTERJEE, S.S.NIJJAR
Jitendra Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. These Appeals are directed against the common Division Bench judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 22.12.2006. By the aforesaid judgment, the High Court decided number of Appeals directed against the common judgment of the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.25328 of 2001 and a number of other connected writ petitions.
3. The appellants had assailed the judgment dated 22.5.2002 of the learned Single Judge to the extent that the Writ Petition Nos.25328, 26847, 36411, 28836, 26177, 34039, 4630, 32763, 27849, 27060, 29069 of 2001 and 47528 of 2002 had been dismissed whereby the petitioners-appellants were seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to send them for training to the post of Sub Inspectors. In some of the writ petitions, a prayer had also been made for quashing the entire select list which was also declined by the learned Single Judge. In Special Appeal No.592 of 2006, the appellant who was respondent had assailed the aforesaid judgment of the learned Single Judge only to the extent the Single Judge had issued a writ in the nature of mandamus to the respondent-appella
Indra Sawhney v. Union of India
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh v. K.L.Narsimhan
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh v. Faculty Association
Dr.Preeti Srivastava v. State of M.P.
Bharati Vidyapeeth v. State of Maharashtra, (2004) 11 SCC 755 – Distinguished
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Gopal D.Tirpathi
Union of India v. Dhanwanti Devi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.