JUDGMENT

Kuldip Singh, J.-The appellant was the tenant of the agricultural land in dispute. The land was owned by Anjanabai. After her death on August 8, 1969, Hirabai and Draupdabai, respondents in the appeal herein, became the owners. The Agricultural Lands Tribunal in the proceedings under Section 32F read with Section 32P of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (the Act) came to the conclusion that the appellant was not entitled to puschase the land in dispute and as such was directed to surrender the possession of the said land to the respondents. Appeal against the said order was dismissed by the Sub-Divisional Officer parner division at Ahmednagar. Revision application filed by the appellant was also dismissed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunbal, Pune. The appellant, thereafter, challenged the orders of the authorities under the Act by way of writ petition before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court which was dismissed on June 22, 1994. This appeal by the appellant - tenant is against the judgment of the High Court.

2. We may briefly state the facts. One Yadavrao @ Yadu Kharade and his three sons - Baburao, Jaywantrao and Shankar - from his wife Anjan