K.RAMASWAMY, S.SAGHIR AHMAD, G.B.PATTANAIK
Kirloskar Brothers – Appellant
Versus
Employees State Insurance Corporation – Respondent
ORDER
In these appeals short question that arises for consideration is : Whether the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (for short the Act ) would apply to the regional offices of the appellant at Secunderabad in Andhra Pradesh and Bangalore in Karnataka States. The appellant had established its registered office at Poona for sale and distribution of its products from three factories-one situated at Kirloskarvadi, second at Karad in State of Maharashtra and the third one at Deewas in the State of Madhya Pradesh. Admittedly factories situated in Maharashtra are not covered under the Act. They set up regional offices at several places. The Governments of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka have applied the provisions of Section 2(g) of the Act to the aforesaid regional offices situated at Secunderabad and Bangalore and the respondent had issued notice under Section 3(g) of the Act calling upon them to contribute their share of the health insurance of the workmen working in the respective regional offices. Disputing the liability, the appellant filed application before Insurance Court under Section 75 of the Act. The Court had held that the appellant s regional offices are covered under th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.