SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1015

M. N. VENKATACHALIAH, K. RAMASWAMY
State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Bageshwari Prasad – Respondent


Advocates:
B.B.Singh, K.N.Rai

(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) THIS appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High court of Patna in CWJC No. 4220 of 1990 dated 5/3/1992. The only question that arises for consideration is whether Sita Ram Prasad, Respondent 2 was entitled to be promoted as Office Superintendent in a supertime scale on the basis that he was a reserved candidate in the 6th vacancy. The High court in the impugned judgment relying on the judgment of this court in Chakradhar Paswan (Dr) v. State of Bihar 1 held that since the post of Superintendent is a single post, it cannot be reserved for the reserved candidates. Accordingly, the order of appointment to the reserved vacancy was held to be illegal, a direction was issued to the government to consider the case of the 1st respondent for promotion to the post of OS as a general candidate. The State has impugned that order in this appeal.

(3) IN the government circular, Annx. R-l bearing Letter No. 21-AG-1- 125-KG-20165, the government have decided in providing for reservation and prepared the roster to the posts in the cadre. In para 2, it is stated thus:

"THEREFORE, the State government has taken decision that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top