B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, K.S.PARIPOORNAN
Mohan Bir Singh Chawla – Appellant
Versus
Panjab University, Chandigarh – Respondent
Judgment
B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.-The rule governing admission to LL.B. course among other courses prescribed by the Punjab University provided that while admission shall be made on the basis of merit, ten percent of the marks obtained in the qualifying examination shall be added in the case of candidates who have passed the qualifying examination from the Punjab University. The impugned rule reads:
"(iv) Admission shall be made on merit which shall be determined after giving weightage as under :
(a) 10% marks obtained in the aggregate marks of the qualifying examination passed from Punjab University."
2. A number of writ petitions were filed in the Punjab and Haryana High Court by students, who have passed the qualifying examination from universities other than Punjab University, questioning the validity of the said weightage rule. According to them, the rule violates the equality clause enshrined in Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution and ought to be struck down. The writ petitions have been dismissed by the High Court. Only one of the writ petitioners has approached this Court by way of this Special Leave Petition.
3. Leave granted. Heard the counsel for the appellant and the Punjab
Dr. Pradeep Jain v. Union of India
Dr. Dinesh Kumar v. Motilal Nehru College
State of Rajasthan v. Dr. Ashok Kumar Gupta
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. Thukral Anjali Dev Kumar
P.K. Goyal v. Uttar Pradesh Medical Council
Anant Madaan v. State of Haryana
Sanjay Ahlawat v. Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak
Gujarat University v. Rajiv Gopinath Bhatt
D.N. Chanchala v. State of Mysore
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.