SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1601

B. N. KIRPAL, J. S. VERMA
Rajesh Ahuja – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Mittal – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

Verma, CJI.-Leave granted.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties we are not inclined to interfere with the grant of leave to defendant, but we are of the opinion that terms on which leave has been granted should be modified. We are informed that the sum of Rs. 10 lacs has already been deposited in cash by the respondent herein with the High Court against the entire claim in the suit while security has been offered for the amount of Rs. 10 lacs. We modify the condition of grant of leave and direct the defendant/respondent to deposit a further sum of Rs. 10 lacs in the High Court. The entire amount of Rs. 20 lacs would be kept in fixed deposit so that it is available for being paid to the successful party as a result of the decision of the trial Court. On deposit of the balance amount of Rs.10 lacs in the High Court within 8 weeks, the documents for the purpose of security furnished by the defendant/respondent in the High Court would be returned to the defendant/respondent. The appeals are disposed of accordingly.

Appeal disposed of accordingly.

**********

 

00020

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top