SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

C.N.B.NAIR
Plastikos Packaging – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Allahabad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
T.K. Srivastava,A.K. Jain

ORDER

Per C.N.B. Nair :

The appeal is directed against order-in-original No. MP (287/94) 1401 -1996 dated 27.5.96 passed by the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Allahabad. Under the said order the Commissioner rejected the application of the appellant for remission of Central Excise duty of about Rs. 95,000/- and confirmed duty demand of the same amount. He also imposed a penalty of Rs. 50,000/- on the appellant under Rule 173Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Brief facts of the case leading to the above order are that the appellant is a manufacturer of plastic products like HDPE woven sacks and HDPE fabrics. On 13.12.89 a fire broke out in the appellant's premises and destroyed the stock of manufactured goods. The duty involved on such goods was about Rs. 95,000/- on 15.12.89 the appellant informed the Jurisdictional Central Excise authorities about the fire accident. Subsequently, on 5.4.90 the appellant filed an application before the-Jurisdictional Supdt. for remission of duty under Rule 49 of the Central Excise Rules. Some more correspondence took place including with the Collector of Central Excise. Show cause notice dt. 4.10.94 was issued proposing to reject the applic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top