SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 2017

1997(2) Supreme 33
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy and G.T. Nanavati, JJ.
M/s Mohan Meakin Ltd. -Appellant
versus
Excise & Taxation Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2457 of 1980
Decided on 27-11-1996
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : Soli J. Sorabjee, Sr. Adv., Ravinder Narain, Rajan Narain, Ms. Amrita Mitra, Amit Bansal and Pankaj Kalra, Advocates.
For the Respondents : T. Sridharan and Shiv Pujan Singh, Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
Point at which excise duty is exigible to duty is the time when finished product i.e. bear was received in bottling tank or finished product was removed from the place of storage or warehouse etc.

Headnote:Punjab Excise Act, 1914-Section 23-Punjab Breweries Rules, 1932-Rule 10(3.4)-Beer-Levy of excise duty sought to be made at the stage when manufacturing was at wort stage-Levying excise duty upon alcoholic liquor arises when excisable article is brought to stage of human consumption-Beer is exigible to duty when the finished product was received in bottling tank or is removed from the place of storage or warehouse etc. (Paras 6 to 8)

       

ORDER

This appeal by special leave arises from the Judgment of the Division Bench of the Himachal Pradesh High Court, made on July 2, 1980 in Writ Petition No. 121/79. The question is : at what stage the beer is exigible to duty under the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 (1 of 1914) (for short, the Act ). The Division Bench upholding Rule 10(3.4) of the Rules made under Section 58 of the Act read with Section 59 of Punjab Breweries Rules, 1932 (for short, the Rules ), came to the conclusion that it is exigible to duty at the stage when it is in fermentation, i.e., wort in terms of Rule 10(3.4). Calling that decision in question, this appeal came to be filed.

2. With a view to appreciate correctness of the view taken and having heard the learned counsel for the parties, it is necessary to look into the relevant provisions of the Act and the Rules, Chapter I, Section 3 of the Act defines various words and phrases in the Act. Section 3(1) defines "Bear" to include ale, porter, stout, and all other fermented liquors made from malt. "Liquor" has been defined under Section 3(14) of the Act to mean "intoxicating liquor and includes all liquid consisting of or containing alcohol; also any substance which the State Government may by notification declare, to be liquor for the purpose of this Act". "Excisable article" has been defined in Section 3(6) to mean any alcoholic liquor for human consumption; or any intoxicating drug. "Excise duty" and "countervailing duty" as defined in Section 3(6-b) would mean any such excise duty or countervailing duty, as the case may be, as is mentioned in Entry 51 of List-II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution. "Intoxicant" under Section 3(12-a) means any liquor or intoxicating drug as has been defined in Section 3(16) to include every process, whether natural or artificial by which any intoxicant is produced or prepared, and also redistillation, and every process for the rectification, reduction, flavouring, blending or colouring of liquor. "Place" has been defined under Section 3(17) to include a building, shop, tent and closure, booth, vehicle, vessel, boat and raft. "Spirit" has been defined in Section 3(19) to mean any liquor containing alcohol obtained by distillation, whether denatured or not. Section 31 of the Act is the charging provision which envisages that an excise duty, or a countervailing duty, as the case may be, at such rate or rates as the State Government shall direct, may be imposed, either generally or for any specified local area, on any excisable article. Section 23 of the Act prescribes removal of the excisable article from the distillery, brewery etc. and provides that no intoxicant shall be removed from any distillery, brewery, warehouse, or other place of storage established, or licensed under the Act, unless the duty, if any, payable under Chapter V has been paid or a bond has been executed for the payment thereof. Chapter V deals with the levy of the duties and fees; the details of which are not material for the purpose of this case. As stated earlier, in this case the levy of excise duty was sought to be made at the stage when the manufacturing of the beer was at wort stage. The question is : whether the levy of excise duty, on beer when it was in the process of manufacture is correct ? The levy of excise duty is on alcoholic liquor for human consumption, manufacture or production. At what stage bear is exigible to duty is the question. The process of manufacture of beer is described as under :

"The first stage brewing process is the feeding of Malt and adjuncts into a vessel known as Mash Tun. There it is mixed with hot water and maintained at certain temperature. The objective of this process is to convert the straches of the malt into fermentable suger.

The extract is drawn from the Mash Tun and boiled with the addition of hops for one to two hours after which it is contrifuged, cooled and received in the receiving wats. At this stage, it is called "Wort" and contains only f





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top