SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 538

E. S. VENKATARAMIAH, G. L. OZA, K. N. SINGH, RANGANATH MISRA, S. NATARAJAN, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, B. C. RAY
Synthetics And Chemicals LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.GANGULY, A.K.Sangal, A.K.SRIVASTAVA, A.K.VERMA, A.M.KHANWILKAR, A.P.Hathi, A.S.BHASME, A.S.Bobde, A.SUBBA RAO, A.Subhashini, A.T.M.SAMPATH, Altaf Ahmed, AMRITA SANGHI, Anil B.Divan, Anil Kumar, ANURADHA MAHAJAN, ASHOK SINGH, C.SHIVAPPA, D.GOVERDHAN CHARY, D.GUTPA, D.N.Mishra, D.R.K.Reddy, DINESH CHANDRA, F.S.NARIMAN, G.B.SANGHI, G.RATHI, H.K.PURI, HARISH N.SLAVE, Himanshu Shekhar, INDER SINGH, INDRA MAKWANA, J.B.DADACHAN, J.M.Rao, K.A.SWAMY, K.C.DUA, K.D.PRASAD, K.J.JOHN, K.K.Mohan, K.PARASARAN ATTORNEY, L.K.PANDEY, L.M.SINGHVI, M.H.BAIG, M.L.Lahoty, M.N.SHROFF, M.S.Gupta, N.K.SHARMA, N.N.Gupta, Naresh Bakshi, O.P.Sharma, P.H.Parekh, P.R.RAMASESHESH.S.PARIHARHAR, P.S.POTI, P.SHROFF, P.VENUGOPAL RAO, PORUS A.MEHTA, PRABIR CHAUDHARY, R.B.DATAR, R.B.MAHATO, R.F.NARIMAN, R.K.MEHTA, R.N.BANERJEE, R.N.TRIVEDI, R.S.RANA, RAJINDER SACHAR, S.C.Sharma, S.GANESH RAO, S.K.BHATTACHARJEE, S.K.DHOLAKIA, S.S.SHROFF, S.SHARMA, S.SUKUMARAN, SANDIP I.THAKORE, SATISH CHANDRA AGRAWAL, SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI, SHALINI SONI, SHISHIR SHARMA, SHIV PRASAD SHARMA, SUNIL GUPTA, SUNITA SHARMA, SVARAN MAHAJAN, T.T.KUNHIKANNAN, T.V.S.N.Chari, V.KRISHNAMURTHY, V.M.TAMASKAR, V.VENKATA RAMAIAH, YOGESHAR PRASAD

JUDGMENT

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J. :- (For himself, E. S. Venkataramiah, CJI., Ranganath Misra, B. C. Ray,. K. N. Singh and S. Natarajan, JJ.):- These writ petitions, civil appeals and review petitions relate to the right of the States to levy vend fee or duties in respect of industrial alcohol under different legislation in different States. We will first ideal with writ petition No. 182/80. In writ petition No. 182/80 (Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U. P. & Ors.), we are concerned with the notification dated 31st May, 1979, substituting new Rule 17(2) for old Rule 17(2) and providing for a vend fee of Rs. 1.10 per bulk litre for all issues from distillery but in case of FL 39 Licence (like the petitioner in this case), the vend fee would be so charged that the amount of this fee and purchase tax together does not exceed 25 paise per bulk litre. Then there are three review petitions, namely, Review Petitions Nos. 202-04/80 (Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U.P.) and Review Petition No. 17 of 1980 (Kesar Sugar Works Ltd. v. State of U. P.). These are directed againts the judgment and order of this Court dated 19th December, -1979 in State of U. P. v. Synthetics & Chemi









































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top