A.S.ANAND, K.T.THOMAS
Ashok Kumar Srivastav – Appellant
Versus
National Insurance Company LTD. – Respondent
Judgment
Thomas, J.-Special leave granted.
2. Appellant claims to be still in the service of National Insurance Company Limited (respondent) as a probationary Inspector on a contention that the order passed by the respondent on 13.3.1982 terminating his probation is bad in law. He succeeded in the trial Court where he filed the suit for a declaratory decree and also in the first appellate Court, but he was non-suited by the High Court in the second appeal filed by the respondent. Hence he has come up in this Court with this appeal.
3. Appellant was appointed as Inspector on probation at Khalidabad under the Gorakhpur branch of the respondent Company with effect from 19.9.1980, initially for a period of twelve months subject to certain conditions. On 13.3.1982 respondent-company served upon him thirty days notice of termination of his service on the premise that appellant failed to achieve the targeted premium amount.
4. Appellant filed the suit in the Munsif’s Court Gorakhpur for a decree declaring that the said notice of termination is illegal and void and that he continues to be in service of the Company with all the benefits flowing from the post. Respondent-Company conteste
G.K. Sharma & Ors. v. S.D. Sharma & Ors.
Y.B. Patil & Ors. v. Y.L. Patil
Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd. v. Haridas Mundhra & Ors.
Daryao & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors.
The Amalgamated Coalfields Ltd. v. The Janapada Sabha, Chhindwara
Veruareddi Ramaraghava Reddy & Ors. v. Konduru Seshu Reddy & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.