SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 698

K.T.THOMAS, M.B.SHAH
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
V. Padmnabhan Nair – Respondent


Judgment

Thomas, J.-Leave granted.

2. In July 1989, respondent retired from Government service as Superintending Engineer of the P.W.D. under the Government of Kerala. About three years thereafter he was arraigned along with certain other persons before a Special Judge for offence under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (for short ‘the P.C. Act’) and Sections 406, 409, 201 read with Sections 120B and 109 of the Indian Penal Code. A learned Single Judge of the High Court of Kerala quashed the criminal proceedings against the respondent for want of sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short “the Code”). State of Kerala, aggrieved by the said order of the High Court, has come up with this appeal by special leave.

3. The case against the respondent, in short, is that while he was working as Execu­tive Engineer at the Moovattupuzha Valley Irrigation Project Division, he joined himself into a criminal conspiracy with four other accused for defrauding the Government by misappropriating about 600 tonnes of steel rods (costing Rs. 1,26,000/-). When respondent was charge-sheeted for the aforesaid offences, he appeared before the Special Judge’s


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top